Thanks for the changes. I understand the necessity now. I've done some
tests and after your latest fix, everything seems to be working fine.
Let's hope our users won't be too mad at us for changing the format. I
have some time in trains this and next week. Maybe I'll try to figure
out if it's a
On 10/13/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Maybe I'll try to figure
out if it's a small change to bypass the metrics file entirely. :-)
Shouldn't be hard at all, but right now I have to create a test
document to demonstrate the new font features for my own project, so
I won't be
Right, it isn't hard. Almost works after a train ride to Zurich and back.
:-)
On 13.10.2006 11:33:09 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 10/13/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Maybe I'll try to figure
out if it's a small change to bypass the metrics file entirely. :-)
Shouldn't
On 10/11/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...I wonder how much should
be invested in versioning of those files
Ok, so I have added a simplistic versioning system for these metrics
XML files, an exception is thrown when attempting to read incompatible
metrics files
I wonder where this got broken. I believe this used to work.
If this change has an effect on the XML files generated, then we should
be careful because people might not recreate their metric files and
subsequently run into problems.
On 11.10.2006 13:15:54 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Hi FOPpers,
On 10/11/06, Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...If this change has an effect on the XML files generated, then we should
be careful because people might not recreate their metric files and
subsequently run into problems...
How about adding a version number to the XML metrics files?
Sure. However, as we discussed in Amsterdam, the goal should be that we
don't rely on those XML files much longer, so I wonder how much should
be invested in versioning of those files. But if you don't see a way
around it... I still don't understand why exactly this change is
necessary.
On
