Carlos Sanchez:
groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
Cameron McCormack:
OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
wrong? (It says groupIdorg.apache.xmlgraphics/groupId in the POM
file for both.)
Carlos Sanchez:
it's up to xmlgraphics
On 03.12.2007 07:10:34 Cameron McCormack wrote:
Carlos Sanchez:
groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
Cameron McCormack:
OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
wrong? (It says groupIdorg.apache.xmlgraphics/groupId in the POM
file for
On Nov 30, 2007 2:41 PM, Cameron McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
groupId should probably be org.apache.xmlgraphics.batik
OK. Does that mean the groupId for FOP and XML Graphics Commons is
wrong? (It says groupIdorg.apache.xmlgraphics/groupId in the POM
file for both.)
it's up to
Hi Carlos.
Carlos Sanchez:
The best person that will help you is a user of Batik that uses Maven, Lars?
see some comments inline
Cameron McCormack:
First, should I keep the groupId as batik? It seems inconsistent with
those for FOP and Commons, which are using org.apache.xmlgraphics.
Cameron McCormack:
Second, how do I deal with the issue of the mutual dependency between
FOP and Batik? The Batik 1.7 release will depend on Fop 0.93, but in
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/xmlgraphics/fop/0.93/fop-0.93.pom
it says that FOP 0.93 depends on
