Hi,
unless I'm missing something, fontbox dev activity is quite slow
(latest commit was on 2007-10-01, 6 years ago, see [1]).
IMHO, introducing a dependency on such project witch will need some
improvement is not a good thing, unless we can ensure that submitting
patches to it will be applied on
Hi Pascal,
FontBox is a small library within the PDFBox project. PDFBox is an
active Apache project, so getting patches committed there shouldn't be a
problem. Jeremias is a committer on PDFBox too. FontBox is no longer
hosted on Source Forge, as it was moved to Apache a few years back;
Hi,
Ok, I've missed that. I did found only the sourceforge repos, I'm sorry.
So i'm +1 too.
2013/1/10 Chris Bowditch bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com:
Hi Pascal,
FontBox is a small library within the PDFBox project. PDFBox is an active
Apache project, so getting patches committed there shouldn't
who is also a FOP committer (Jeremias), but
I am sure the other committers are fairly active.
Regards,
Robert
[1] http://pdfbox.apache.org/dependencies.html
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:12:43 +0100
Subject: Re: OTF CFF Implementation
From: psancho@gmail.com
To: fop-dev
Ignore my last message. Chris got there first.
From: rme...@hotmail.co.uk
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: OTF CFF Implementation
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:01:00 +
Hi Pascal,
My apologies as I should have provided the link [1]. I am guessing that the
sourceforge project
. Chris got there first.
--
From: rme...@hotmail.co.uk
To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: OTF CFF Implementation
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:01:00 +
Hi Pascal,
My apologies as I should have provided the link [1]. I am guessing that
the sourceforge
