Re: pdfbox build?

2015-05-15 Thread Eric Douglas
Nevermind, I believe this is the wrong distribution list. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Eric Douglas edoug...@blockhouse.com wrote: How do I build the latest pdfbox? I downloaded the trunk using git in Eclipse and the maven package run says failed. Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 1,

Re: PDFBox

2014-06-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
Hi Simon, Yes I did argue against an upgrade to 1.6 for the reasons stated at that time, i.e. improved annotation support. However, nearly another year on, Java 8 has been out for a while and additional reasons to upgrade emerge, i.e. allow us to leverage PDFBox improvements. Therefore, I'm

Re: PDFBox

2014-06-19 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hehe, you found it... I didn't search on general list, my bad. Good catch! 2014-06-18 17:45 GMT+02:00 Robert Meyer rme...@hotmail.co.uk: Hi, I managed to find Chris' original comment:

Re: PDFBox

2014-06-18 Thread Pascal Sancho
IIRC, Chris arged that it was hard to upgrade JVM on certain Unix environments. I didn't found the discussion, but probably was on this list, 2 or 3 monthes ago. That said, you bring some new arguments that have to be taken into account. IMHO, that means that we should provide 2 FOP versions: -

RE: PDFBox

2014-06-18 Thread Robert Meyer
to the future. Who knows, maybe we should just skip 1.6 and head straight to 1.8 ;-) Regards, Robert Meyer Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:17:17 +0200 Subject: Re: PDFBox From: psancho@gmail.com To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org IIRC, Chris arged that it was hard to upgrade JVM on certain

Re: PDFBox

2014-06-18 Thread Glenn Adams
makes sense. I would be in favour of that as I think FOP should be able to look to the future. Who knows, maybe we should just skip 1.6 and head straight to 1.8 ;-) Regards, Robert Meyer Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:17:17 +0200 Subject: Re: PDFBox From: psancho@gmail.com To: fop-dev