On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:07 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.04.2006 13:55:44 Peter West wrote:
snip/
Is there other than accidental co-ordination between commons, batik and
fop?
Accidental? ATM, no coordination is required for releasing Commons as
Batik doesn't use it, yet. The plan
Ok, I think I'm beginning to see the problem. Looking at the Commons
plan on the wiki it uses the term transcoder. That's not good. We're
planning to move to the PDF and PS/EPS transcoders to Batik, not to
Commons (mentioned in parantheses on the wiki page). Only the basic
Graphics2D
On 12.04.2006 13:55:44 Peter West wrote:
snip/
Is there other than accidental co-ordination between commons, batik and
fop?
Accidental? ATM, no coordination is required for releasing Commons as
Batik doesn't use it, yet. The plan for XML Graphics Commons on the Wiki
is still valid and