Re: Release coordination in XML Graphics (was: [VOTE] Release Apache XML Graphics Commons 1.0 and Apache FOP 0.92beta)

2006-04-13 Thread Peter West
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 14:07 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 12.04.2006 13:55:44 Peter West wrote: snip/ Is there other than accidental co-ordination between commons, batik and fop? Accidental? ATM, no coordination is required for releasing Commons as Batik doesn't use it, yet. The plan

Re: Release coordination in XML Graphics (was: [VOTE] Release Apache XML Graphics Commons 1.0 and Apache FOP 0.92beta)

2006-04-13 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Ok, I think I'm beginning to see the problem. Looking at the Commons plan on the wiki it uses the term transcoder. That's not good. We're planning to move to the PDF and PS/EPS transcoders to Batik, not to Commons (mentioned in parantheses on the wiki page). Only the basic Graphics2D

Re: Release coordination in XML Graphics (was: [VOTE] Release Apache XML Graphics Commons 1.0 and Apache FOP 0.92beta)

2006-04-12 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 12.04.2006 13:55:44 Peter West wrote: snip/ Is there other than accidental co-ordination between commons, batik and fop? Accidental? ATM, no coordination is required for releasing Commons as Batik doesn't use it, yet. The plan for XML Graphics Commons on the Wiki is still valid and