Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki

On 22.09.2006 20:40:17 Simon Pepping wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:05:54PM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> > I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/

Certainly not. But it might help you getting to know Cocoon since you're
likely going to do Cocoon projects in the future, right?

> > Also, although this is perhaps a bit ambitious for two days, we could
> > discuss about the merging of the line- and page-level breaking
> > algorithms?
> 
> It is a good idea to look at this, although it is a very complex
> subject.

Yeah, and don't expect to get much done at a hackathon.

> What is a Cocoon serializer in FOP? What does Maven have to do with it?

A serializer is a Cocoon component that converts an XML stream (FO in
this case) to a binary stream (PDF in this case). It's how FOP is
integrated into Cocoon so the Cocooners can generate PDFs. They have a
FOPSerializer for 0.20.5 but now that the API has changed they need a
new one. http://cocoon.apache.org/2.1/userdocs/pdf-serializer.html

Maven is used to build Cocoon 2.2 and I've already tried to write a
FOPSerializer during the last ApacheCon but I spent the whole day just
trying to build Cocoon using Maven, failing in the end.




Jeremias Maerki



Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Simon Pepping
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 06:05:54PM +0200, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/
> 
> Also, although this is perhaps a bit ambitious for two days, we could
> discuss about the merging of the line- and page-level breaking
> algorithms?

It is a good idea to look at this, although it is a very complex
subject.

What is a Cocoon serializer in FOP? What does Maven have to do with it?

Simon

> Vincent
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> > Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
> > with me this time. ;-) We could also do a Bugzilla cleanup (long due).
> > Improving the docs and the FAQ is another idea.
> > 
> > On 21.09.2006 10:02:46 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> >> Hi FOPpers,
> >>
> >> As I think some of you are coming to the Cocoon GetTogether: you're
> >> welcome to sign up at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/GT2006Hackaton.
> >>
> >> I have added "creating a Cocoon serializer for the current FOP
> >> release" as a hacking idea. Not sure if I'll have much time to work on
> >> this myself, but it'd be very nice to have.
> >>
> >> -Bertrand
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki
> > 

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu


Re: Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On 9/22/06, Vincent Hennebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/...


I'm sure Cocoonistas will be delighted to have you guys around.

-Bertrand


Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Vincent Hennebert
I know about nothing of Cocoon, will that be a problem? :-/

Also, although this is perhaps a bit ambitious for two days, we could
discuss about the merging of the line- and page-level breaking
algorithms?

Vincent


Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
> with me this time. ;-) We could also do a Bugzilla cleanup (long due).
> Improving the docs and the FAQ is another idea.
> 
> On 21.09.2006 10:02:46 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>> Hi FOPpers,
>>
>> As I think some of you are coming to the Cocoon GetTogether: you're
>> welcome to sign up at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/GT2006Hackaton.
>>
>> I have added "creating a Cocoon serializer for the current FOP
>> release" as a hacking idea. Not sure if I'll have much time to work on
>> this myself, but it'd be very nice to have.
>>
>> -Bertrand
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 


Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Cocoon 2.1.x then. That sounds like a more productive approach. :-)

If they fire up their flak, I'll retaliate by ranting about Maven. Hehe.

On 22.09.2006 15:50:50 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
> > with me this time. ;-)...
> 
> I might get some flak from the Cocoon team for saying this, but I
> think a FOP trunk serializer would be good for Cocoon 2.1.x as well
> (the 2.1 build does not use Maven, it's only 2.2 which uses Maven).
> 
> Many people still use Cocoon 2.1, and this is especially true of
> people who use it "only" for publishing purposes, IMHO.
> 
> -Bertrand



Jeremias Maerki



Re: Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz

On 9/22/06, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
with me this time. ;-)...


I might get some flak from the Cocoon team for saying this, but I
think a FOP trunk serializer would be good for Cocoon 2.1.x as well
(the 2.1 build does not use Maven, it's only 2.2 which uses Maven).

Many people still use Cocoon 2.1, and this is especially true of
people who use it "only" for publishing purposes, IMHO.

-Bertrand


Re: Signup for the Cocoon GT Hackathon

2006-09-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Added myself. The Cocoon Serializer is a good idea, IF!!! Maven is kind
with me this time. ;-) We could also do a Bugzilla cleanup (long due).
Improving the docs and the FAQ is another idea.

On 21.09.2006 10:02:46 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> Hi FOPpers,
> 
> As I think some of you are coming to the Cocoon GetTogether: you're
> welcome to sign up at http://wiki.apache.org/cocoon/GT2006Hackaton.
> 
> I have added "creating a Cocoon serializer for the current FOP
> release" as a hacking idea. Not sure if I'll have much time to work on
> this myself, but it'd be very nice to have.
> 
> -Bertrand



Jeremias Maerki