Re: fop.sh vs fop

2005-10-29 Thread Manuel Mall
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 09:58 pm, Manuel Mall wrote:
 While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
 project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for
 *nixes) and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This
 means the command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and
 Windows.

 Personally I like that change (never favored typing command.sh
 instead of just command) and suggest we make the same change for
 FOP. Also makes documentation simpler as the command line invocation
 is the same everywhere.

 +1 from me

This has been done now.

In the process I updated the fop script to match the latest ant script. 
I would appreciate if other committers working on *nixes could test the 
new script in their environments and fix or report any problems.

Also if anyone can test it under cygwin?

 Manuel

Thanks

Manuel


Re: fop.sh vs fop

2005-10-29 Thread Simon Pepping
On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 05:12:11PM +0800, Manuel Mall wrote:
 This has been done now.
 
 In the process I updated the fop script to match the latest ant script. 
 I would appreciate if other committers working on *nixes could test the 
 new script in their environments and fix or report any problems.

Committed a few small changes. Otherwise it works OK for me.

Simon

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl



Re: fop.sh vs fop

2005-10-28 Thread Christian Geisert
Manuel Mall schrieb:
 While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant 
 project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes) 
 and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the 
 command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and Windows.
 
 Personally I like that change (never favored typing command.sh instead 
 of just command) and suggest we make the same change for FOP. Also 
 makes documentation simpler as the command line invocation is the same 
 everywhere.

+1

Christian


Re: fop.sh vs fop

2005-10-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
+0.5 as I'm not on Unix but if it makes people's life easier like this

On 27.10.2005 15:58:45 Manuel Mall wrote:
 While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant 
 project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes) 
 and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the 
 command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and Windows.
 
 Personally I like that change (never favored typing command.sh instead 
 of just command) and suggest we make the same change for FOP. Also 
 makes documentation simpler as the command line invocation is the same 
 everywhere.
 
 +1 from me
 
 Manuel



Jeremias Maerki



Re: fop.sh vs fop

2005-10-27 Thread The Web Maestro

On Oct 27, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Manuel Mall wrote:

While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes)
and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the
command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and Windows.

Personally I like that change (never favored typing command.sh 
instead

of just command) and suggest we make the same change for FOP. Also
makes documentation simpler as the command line invocation is the same
everywhere.

+1 from me

Manuel


+1

Regards,

Web Maestro Clay
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet