Re: inline alignment question

2005-09-25 Thread Manuel Mall
FWIW I just downloaded the evaluation version of the Antennahouse Formatter and it generates as per my option b). For all to see here is the fo: fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format; xmlns:svg=http://www.w3.org/2000/svg; fo:layout-master-set fo:simple-page-master

Re: inline alignment question

2005-09-25 Thread Manuel Mall
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:12 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Sep 25, 2005, at 03:49, Manuel Mall wrote: snip/ ... but the baseline-shift value for the first inline is non-zero (value baseline is not equal to value 0), so the Rec says in 7.13.3: I think that is the core point. IMO the

Re: inline alignment question

2005-09-24 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Sep 24, 2005, at 17:22, Manuel Mall wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:04 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: It seems then that the vertical-align on the innermost inline actually refers to the after-edge, which IIC would be relative to the after-edge of its parent (and not that of the block

Re: inline alignment question

2005-09-24 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Sep 24, 2005, at 17:39, Manuel Mall wrote: On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 11:27 pm, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: Anyway, the full description would be: The alignment-baseline on the first inline is aligned with the before-edge baseline of the outer block. Now, IIC, this has an impact on its own

Re: inline alignment question

2005-09-24 Thread Manuel Mall
Andreas, let me start with thanking you for taking the time to look into this and respond so quickly. This is much appreciated. This post arrived here after midnight by which time I was sound asleep. I only got to look at it this morning. On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:39 am, Andreas L Delmelle