I had a look at some other Apache projects:
cocoon: latest
excalibur: current
jakarta-struts: current
lucene: current
jakarta-regexp: current
james: current
logging/log4j: latest=1.2.12, unstable=1.3alpha7
rivet: current
tomcat: 5.0.30beta = link to 5.0.30
ws-jaxme: current
I propose the following:
unstable is a link to 0.90
0.90alpha1 is a link to 0.90
current is a link to 0.20.5
The links appear as directory names on the distribution servers and on
the web site, as Unix soft links or as empty directories with
redirection.
Simon
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:00:01PM +0100, Simon Pepping wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 10:20:09PM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
A matter of definition, I guess. :-) Maybe we should really write
[0.90alpha1] instead of [Latest] then. Care to do that? Or what do you
prefer?
When I visit a site with software, I expect the name latest to point
to the latest stable distribution. The latest unstable distribution
could be named something like development, unstable, testing or next.
The file latest/.htaccess points to fop/0.20.5, and I think that is
best.
Simon
On 18.11.2005 21:43:18 Simon Pepping wrote:
Wouldn't latest point to the stable distribution, 0.20.5?
Simon
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:45:59PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jeremias
Date: Thu Nov 17 13:45:55 2005
New Revision: 345335
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=345335view=rev
Log:
Changed Trunk to Latest Release/[Latest]
Modified:
xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/documentation/content/xdocs/compliance.ihtml
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
