Re: Restarting issue about special penalties for table header situations

2005-04-01 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Now I got it. Thanks for taking the time to explain. Damn, am I uncreative sometimes. On 31.03.2005 22:01:47 Simon Pepping wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:03:19AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > While replaying the whole scenario for tables I stumbled over the table > > breaking penalty prob

Re: Restarting issue about special penalties for table header situations

2005-03-31 Thread Simon Pepping
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:03:19AM +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > While replaying the whole scenario for tables I stumbled over the table > breaking penalty problem again. Luca proposed to handle this without > introducing additional Knuth elements. Luca, you are certainly right > that the element

Restarting issue about special penalties for table header situations

2005-03-31 Thread Jeremias Maerki
While replaying the whole scenario for tables I stumbled over the table breaking penalty problem again. Luca proposed to handle this without introducing additional Knuth elements. Luca, you are certainly right that the element list does not have to be an exact representation of the content generate