On 2015-06-25 Andreas Delmelle wrote:
> > On 2015-06-25 Luis Bernardo wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know why we have the xercesImpl jar in the lib
> > directory?
>
> Good question... I am not 100% certain, but I think this was done
> mostly for reasons of convenience of the end users.
>
For proce
>> Can this jar be removed?
>
> I would say so, yes, unless the policy is to keep it for the sake of
> supporting old JVMs (1.3 and earlier?).
IIRC, FOPs Run page, Java 1.5 and above is required to rub FOP 2.0:
http://xmlgraphics.staging.apache.org/fop/2.0/running.html
System Requirements
Th
Hi Luis
> On 25 Jun 2015, at 16:39, Luis Bernardo wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know why we have the xercesImpl jar in the lib directory?
> Apparently we don't need it to compile and run the unit tests. This is unlike
> xalan which we need for the unit tests.
Good question... I am not 100% certai
Does anyone know why we have the xercesImpl jar in the lib directory?
Apparently we don't need it to compile and run the unit tests. This is
unlike xalan which we need for the unit tests.
Can this jar be removed?
