Re: How to fix image degradation in FOP-generated PDF

2005-01-13 Thread A.R. (Tom) Peters
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Smilgiewicz, Gene [CPB] wrote: > Using fop-0.20.5 on a Sun/Solaris box, I am able to generate a PDF > containing graphics referenced by the tag. The PDF > gets generated (sloowly) but the GIF and JPG images look dithered, not > nearly as sharp a the source images. I

Re: no sub-, super-script in PS from .fo

2004-02-23 Thread A.R. (Tom) Peters
d then generate the final fully compliant PDF with ps2pdf. hold on OK, I get some huge files. And AcroRead can show the drawings. But now my JPG's are all blocky and the fonts are rastered to pixels - awful! Bwa-ha-haaa! > On 23.02.2004 17:24:18 A.R. (Tom) Peters wrote: > >

RE: no sub-, super-script in PS from .fo

2004-02-23 Thread A.R. (Tom) Peters
that I can get everything to work properly. > -Original Message----- > From: A.R. (Tom) Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I noticed that when I generate PostScript output from FO, sub- and > super-scripts are not rendered correctly but are plainly in-line. PDF > output from

no sub-, super-script in PS from .fo

2004-02-20 Thread A.R. (Tom) Peters
I noticed that when I generate PostScript output from FO, sub- and super-scripts are not rendered correctly but are plainly in-line. PDF output from the same .fo is correctly rendered below or above the baseline. I did not find this problem reported in the buglist or in recent mail archives. Ano