My guess is the demand for this is still quite low (esp. WRT pdf output),
due to the extended functionality offered by the Acrobat SDK, which allows
the .NET-minded ( C# / VB ) folks to _easily_ generate pdf output from
whatever source they want (w.o. the intermediate use of anything like
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 06:40, Gunnar Liljas wrote:
Would a .NET port be worthwhile? Very much so.
Is there a reason the .NET app can't communicate with FOP
over a network connection ? Why is a port needed ?
They just might do that, and while they're at it, they'll probably launch an
I'd be no good to Microsoft it was ;)
*ducks*
-Original Message-
From: John Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 December 2003 13:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FOP.NET
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 06:28, SANKAR B wrote:
Hi
Is there anywhere the current FOP is ported to C
We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open
Source components written in Java.
You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To
get it in C# one would have to rewrite the entire thing (although help is
available in the form om Java Language
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 12:47, Gunnar Liljas wrote:
We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open
Source components written in Java.
You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To
get it in C# one would have to rewrite the entire thing (although
-Original Message-
From: Gunnar Liljas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open
Source components written in Java.
You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite
usable. To
Of course it would be _usable_...
My
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FOP.NET
We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open
Source components written in Java.
You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To
get it in C# one would
