Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-02 Thread Gunnar Liljas
> > Would a .NET port be worthwhile? Very much so. > > Is there a reason the .NET app can't communicate with FOP > over a network connection ? Why is a port needed ? > It's not needed, but it would be nice to be able to make homogeneous solutions, and there may be a significant performance gain us

Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-02 Thread John Austin
On Tue, 2003-12-02 at 06:40, Gunnar Liljas wrote: > Would a .NET port be worthwhile? Very much so. Is there a reason the .NET app can't communicate with FOP over a network connection ? Why is a port needed ? > They just might do that, and while they're at it, they'll probably launch an > alterna

Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-02 Thread Gunnar Liljas
> My guess is the demand for this is still quite low (esp. WRT pdf output), > due to the extended functionality offered by the Acrobat SDK, which allows > the .NET-minded ( C# / VB ) folks to _easily_ generate pdf output from > whatever source they want (w.o. the intermediate use of anything like >

RE: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread Robert C. Leif
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 8:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP.NET > We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open > Source components written in Java. > You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable.

RE: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
> -Original Message- > From: Gunnar Liljas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open > > Source components written in Java. > > > You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite > usable. To Of course it would be _usable

Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 12:47, Gunnar Liljas wrote: > > We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open > > Source components written in Java. > > > You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To > get it in C# one would have to rewrite the entire thing (al

Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread Gunnar Liljas
> We have all been wondering why .NET isn't implemented in Open > Source components written in Java. > You're ironic, I know, but .NET-usage of FOP would still be quite usable. To get it in C# one would have to rewrite the entire thing (although help is available in the form om Java Language Conver

RE: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread Richard Sweeney
I'd be no good to Microsoft it was ;) *ducks* -Original Message- From: John Austin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 December 2003 13:41 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP.NET On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 06:28, SANKAR B wrote: > Hi > > Is there anywhere the current FOP

Re: FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread John Austin
On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 06:28, SANKAR B wrote: > Hi > > Is there anywhere the current FOP is ported to C#. Ive found one in SF.net, > but its old one and pdf is not ported in that and that proj. was also not > active. Even NFOP the fop port done in J# is a very old one. Y dont Apache > doesnt sho

FOP.NET

2003-12-01 Thread SANKAR B
Hi Is there anywhere the current FOP is ported to C#. Ive found one in SF.net, but its old one and pdf is not ported in that and that proj. was also not active. Even NFOP the fop port done in J# is a very old one. Y dont Apache doesnt show much interest on .NET. Im trying to imp. FOP in Mono fro