Afraid not :(
A higher scale factor creates a bigger BufferedImage.The end result is a
larger 72 dpi tiff.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Antwort:
can I get TI
FF Type 1?
Francis, Ronald wrote:
I've looked at the code in the AWTRenderer where a BufferedImage is
created
to paint the page on(defaults to 72 dpi)
That is addressed by the redesign under way.
Out of curiosity, how can we create a high res image / graphics context
Thanks Clay, but unfortunately the problem here is different.
This is what I think is happening, Oleg could probably correct me if I'm
wrong:
The TIFFRenderer, which is a subclass of the AWTRenderer works by first
rendering the entire fo page (not just images embedded /referenced in the
page)
I have the smae problem , don't think fop supports it yet.
You could try putting your table inside another table with three equal width
cells.
Cheers,
Ronald
-Original Message-
From: sujata shetty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 2:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Is there a known problem with using percentages with table property
inline-progression-dimension
eg fo:table inline-progression-dimension=3.0in table-layout=fixed
works,but fo:table inline-progression-dimension=50% table-layout=fixed
gives me -
[ERROR] Error in text-align-last property value
