.
Benoit
P.S. For the record, I am not doing this on behalf of Eurocontrol,
despite me using that email address.
-Original Message-
From: MAISONNY Benoit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 12:05 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: feature and limitation lists
]'
Betreff: RE: feature and limitation lists
Here are some early results. All elements are listed, but only
unimplemented attributes child elements are shown within the
elements. Attributes values are not checked yet; additional comments
regarding partial implementation are not there yet neither
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: feature and limitation lists
Here's an FOP specific xsd. I sent the segregated DTD in a previous
response on this same thread. It's a pain to make a usable XSD from a
DTD because the conversion tools tend to explode everything
out and you
get
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: feature and limitation lists
Hello,
Markus wrote:
If you have any suggestions about how to do this easily then
share your ideas with us.
I've suggested (or asked) to create
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: feature and limitation lists
Hello,
Markus wrote:
If you have any suggestions about how to do this easily then
share your ideas with us.
I've suggested (or asked) to create a special fop.dtd
Title: RE: feature and limitation lists
Hello,
Yes, I think this would be very helpful. But it has one
drawback though.
You realize only after
implementing that s.th. doesn't work and expensive rework is
necessary.
If you have a nice editor, you can use the DTD resp. XSchema
