Re: support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs

2002-04-27 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Nathan On 25.04.2002 15:00:29 Nathan Carter wrote: Jeremias, Thanks for your thoughtful response. Jeremias Maerki wrote: Being the one who wrote the PS renderer in the first place, I can comment on a few things: - The PS renderer, as it is now, is more of a proof of concept,

RE: support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs

2002-04-26 Thread Mark Jiang
22:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs Being the one who wrote the PS renderer in the first place, I can comment on a few things: - The PS renderer, as it is now, is more of a proof of concept, than anything else. Some people are using

support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs

2002-04-25 Thread Nathan Carter
I currently use PJ for PDF output from a homegrown customer/member management system, built on JBoss/Postgresql/etc. There are two basic uses for the PDF output: 1) letters that use standard fonts to produce a mail merged PDF form letter - starting with a blank PDF document and text grabbed

Re: support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs

2002-04-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Being the one who wrote the PS renderer in the first place, I can comment on a few things: - The PS renderer, as it is now, is more of a proof of concept, than anything else. Some people are using it productively, though. - As you gathered, there are a few things that still need to be done.

Re: support for PS printer-specific options using PPDs

2002-04-25 Thread Nathan Carter
Jeremias, Thanks for your thoughtful response. Jeremias Maerki wrote: Being the one who wrote the PS renderer in the first place, I can comment on a few things: - The PS renderer, as it is now, is more of a proof of concept, than anything else. Some people are using it productively, though. -