Strange, the difference was very noticeable, in the XSL-transforms (to
HTML,Excel,FO) as well as in de FOP-PDF generation step.
Like XML-FO-PDF in 10 seconds instead of 50!!
Other people reported the same thing
e.g. see the thread Re: FOP performance on Win98/JRE 1.3.1 on FOP-DEV.
That's
I have a sinking feeling another xalan/xerces combination is somewhere in
my classpath.
The problem? I don't have a classpath env. variable set.
I wonder where that list of places the 1.4JVM looks for classes on
win32 is?
On Thu, 14 Mar 2002, Peter Jacobs wrote:
Strange, the difference was
Are you using the included Xalan and Xerces.jar? I replaced them with Xalan
2.2 and Xerces 1.4.2 and got big improvement in speed (on Win2000 and Sun
Solaris).
Peter
Peter Jacobs
Freelance multimedia programmeur
De Budetstraat 8
B-3201 Aarschot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually the FAQ (at http://www.owal.co.uk/cgi-bin/fopfaq.cgi since I have
given up on the interactive Jyve program)
doesn't contain much on memory consumption. I will add in the new page
sequence when I (or someone else) comes up with an example.
Alex
At 20:22 12/03/2002, Chuck Paussa wrote:
That's interesting that it made a difference for you. On our XML/XSL, it
didn't make much difference - maybe it shaved 1-2 seconds of a 60 second
rendering.
-David
On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Peter Jacobs wrote:
Are you using the included Xalan and Xerces.jar? I replaced them with Xalan
2.2 and
Title: FOP Performance Limitations?
All,
I am currently working on a project where we are dynamically creating PDF documents based on a user input. When a user selects a specific period of time, we pull out the matching records from the database, convert the dataset to XML and render a PDF
I've been making pretty big PDFs with a similar system and can share a few
off-the-cuff comments.
It's obvious to me that the structure of your fo document - sequences,
page layout, flows, etc - can make a significant difference in memory
usage and speed. However, I don't have enough concrete
