Clay Leeds wrote:
If you could give me an idea of areas where I
might be able to help, I might be able to present it to my employer. As
for my talents, I'm more of a web developer than a programmer, so Java
is pretty much out.
There is more than enough to do for everyone: improving examples,
You're running FOP from the command line, so you won't have any chance
to influence the setting of the logger yourself. You can only use the -d
option to set the logger to DEBUG level. But what you see here is
probably a bug in 0.20.4. Have you tried 0.20.5rc already?
On 10.01.2003 18:43:02 Clay
Jeremias,
At 09:51 AM 1/10/2003, you wrote:
You're running FOP from the command line, so you won't have any chance
to influence the setting of the logger yourself. You can only use the -d
option to set the logger to DEBUG level. But what you see here is
probably a bug in 0.20.4. Have you tried
Jeremias,
At 10:34 AM 1/10/2003, you wrote:
On 10.01.2003 19:11:02 Clay Leeds wrote:
FWIW, I've tried 0.20.5rc and have found the output almost identical with
the current version. One exception is that it seems to run about 30%-40%
faster now (!):
*GRIN* Thanks especially to Henrik Olson for
On 10.01.2003 19:45:28 Clay Leeds wrote:
I'd be interested in helping where I could, but I'd have to get the
go-ahead from my employer. If you could give me an idea of areas where I
might be able to help, I might be able to present it to my employer. As for
my talents, I'm more of a web
