At 12:47 30/06/02, you wrote:
This question is becoming an FAQ. FOP is being redesigned to allow a
good implementation of all the missing functionality for XSL:FO. We
can't tell when full keep-with functionality is going to be available.
I have my old FOP FAQ here http://www.owal.co.uk/cgi-bin/fop
This question is becoming an FAQ. FOP is being redesigned to allow a
good implementation of all the missing functionality for XSL:FO. We
can't tell when full keep-with functionality is going to be available.
In the meantime, see also Joerg's comment:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=1021
Costantino Sertorio wrote:
Hallo Christian,
I am wondering if the problem with the properties keep-with-next for blocks
is now solved or not (feature currently officially "broken").
Am I right to understand that they are not solved in this release?
Correct.
Could you please let me know if they will
Hallo Christian,
I am wondering if the problem with the properties keep-with-next for blocks
is now solved or not (feature currently officially "broken").
Am I right to understand that they are not solved in this release?
Could you please let me know if they will be solved maybe in the next-next
r
