Arved Sandstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The entity references are a side issue. If you are going to use validation
then you must describe the entire XML vocabulary, because that is the
meaning of valid.
That's correct, however, even non-validating parsers are required to
read and respect an
ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote:
[ big snip ]
You are stating that the document contains an 'example' tag
as the root element, but not stating what the root element
contains is an error.
The following XML is valid:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1 standalone=yes?
!DOCTYPE example [
!ELEMENT
David Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be curious to find a list of what entities are in and what aren't.
Also, I presume I can use a numeric code (#number; - or amp;#number;) to
reference the character directly. However, it seems like a list of those
numbers and their corresponding
David Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would be curious to find a list of what entities are in and what aren't.
Also, I presume I can use a numeric code (#number; - or amp;#number;) to
reference the character directly. However, it seems like a list of those
numbers and their corresponding
