keep-with-.. property
I've read a lot in the archives about the different keep-with property; what I understood is that some of them are not implemented yet, but that keep-with-next should work on table rows. Is there another reason why my example here doesn't keep the rows together? - fo:table-row keep-with-next=always font-weight=bold font-size=10pt - fo:table-cell - fo:block - fo:table font-size=10pt border-style=solid fo:table-column column-width=1.2cm / fo:table-column column-width=15.8cm / - fo:table-body - fo:table-row - fo:table-cell fo:block10/fo:block /fo:table-cell - fo:table-cell fo:blockRAPPORTS DE LA COMMISSION DE GRACE/fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row - fo:table-row font-weight=normal fo:table-cell / - fo:table-cell fo:block / /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row /fo:table-body /fo:table /fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row fo:table-row keep-with-next=always height=30pt / !-- I'm trying to avoid a page-break here, but no success so far... -- - fo:table-row font-weight=bold font-size=10pt - fo:table-cell - fo:block - fo:table font-size=10pt border-style=none fo:table-column column-width=1.2cm / fo:table-column column-width=2.3cm / fo:table-column column-width=13.5cm / - fo:table-body - fo:table-row fo:table-cell / fo:table-cell / - fo:table-cell text-align=left fo:block7 rapports, préavis adoptés./fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row - fo:table-row fo:table-cell / fo:table-cell / - fo:table-cell text-align=left fo:block / /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row /fo:table-body /fo:table /fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row
Re: keep-with-.. property
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 08:58, Hahn Kurt (CHA) wrote: . . . Is there another reason why my example here doesn't keep the rows together? I don't know exactly what is supposed to work or not, but here we've been successfully using the following constructs with FOP 0.20.3rc: fo:table-row keep-with-previous=always keep-together=always fo:table-row keep-with-next=always keep-together=always fo:table-row keep-with-previous=always Note however that bug 7449 is not fixed yet: rows that do not fit on one page cause infinite loops (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7449) -Bertrand
RE: keep-with-.. property
I'm using the same FOP version. If I look at the following code snippet, this table row should never stand alone at the end of a page, but this is exactly what happens (and not only once, but in many places over the entire document. I assume that the property doesn't work in every case, but is there any other way/solution? Kurt - fo:table-row keep-together=always keep-with-next=always height=30pt font-weight=bold font-size=10pt - fo:table-cell - fo:block - fo:table font-size=10pt border-style=none fo:table-column column-width=1.2cm / fo:table-column column-width=15.8cm / - fo:table-body - fo:table-row - fo:table-cell fo:block / /fo:table-cell - fo:table-cell fo:blockJUSTICE, POLICE ET SECURITE* (DJPS)/fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row - fo:table-row font-weight=normal fo:table-cell / - fo:table-cell fo:block(Titulaire: Mme Spoerri Micheline; suppléant: M. Laurent Moutinot)/fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row /fo:table-body /fo:table /fo:block /fo:table-cell /fo:table-row -Message d'origine- De : Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi, 25. juin 2002 09:31 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hahn Kurt (CHA); '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Objet : Re: keep-with-.. property On Tuesday 25 June 2002 08:58, Hahn Kurt (CHA) wrote: . . . Is there another reason why my example here doesn't keep the rows together? I don't know exactly what is supposed to work or not, but here we've been successfully using the following constructs with FOP 0.20.3rc: fo:table-row keep-with-previous=always keep-together=always fo:table-row keep-with-next=always keep-together=always fo:table-row keep-with-previous=always Note however that bug 7449 is not fixed yet: rows that do not fit on one page cause infinite loops (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7449) -Bertrand
RE: keep-with-.. property
I don't exactly know what you mean, but I think that wouldn't fit my needs, which is, that the table-row shown belown should be on a new page if there's not enough space to add at least one more row (actually much like the title of a chapter or a section, which should never stand alone, but doesn't have necessarily to start a new page everytime) -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi, 25. juin 2002 10:38 À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : RE: keep-with-.. property put it in one block together whith the data that it alsways be shown with and try bertrands code on the fo:block property... is a wild guess neva tried this one before :D but wild guesses fop has always worked for me :D Jochen Maes ICT Development KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com) Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683 B-1080 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 429 96 81 GSM: +32 496 57 90 99 E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising from the use of, or reliance on, the information.
RE: keep-with-.. property
in that case i use the table header and table footer function, in your case i would use the row you never want to be alone as the table header of the embedded table that follows. put there in the table tage keep-together='always' etc... is this what you mean...? Jochen Maes ICT Development KBC Securities (kbcsecurities.com) Havenlaan 12 Avenue du Port SIF 8683 B-1080 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 2 429 96 81 GSM: +32 496 57 90 99 E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments hereto are for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. You may not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. If you have received this e-mail message without being the intended recipient, please notify KBC Securities promptly and delete this e-mail. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorised to state them to be the views of KBC Securities. KBC Securities reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks and any messages addressed to, received or sent by KBC Securities or its employees are deemed to be professional in nature. The sender or recipient of any messages to or of KBC Securities agrees that those may be read by other employees of KBC Securities than the stated recipient or sender in order to ensure the continuity of work-related activities and allow supervision thereof. KBC Securities does not accept liability for the correct and complete transmission of the information, nor for any delay or interruption of the transmission, nor for damages arising from the use of, or reliance on, the information.
Is there any alternative to the Keep-together property
As we all know, the following properties still don't work with fop 0.20.3: keep-together keep-with-previous keep-with-next Is there any solution to do it another way ? Does someone knowwhen will these functions be implemented in FOP ? Thank you Stéphane
AW: Is there any alternative to the Keep-together property
You know the workaround with fo:table-row keep-with-previous="always" keep-with-next="always", i guess. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Stéphane REYNIER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. April 2002 15:40An: Mailing list FOPBetreff: Is there any alternative to the "Keep-together" property As we all know, the following properties still don't work with fop 0.20.3: keep-together keep-with-previous keep-with-next Is there any solution to do it another way ? Does someone knowwhen will these functions be implemented in FOP ? Thank you Stéphane
