is it possible to run out of memory
I have a fop engine running on a windows server. Single core AMD - 2GB ram Whenever I try to generate a specific PDF it locks up and goes to 100% CPU But using the same engine locally on my Quad Core - 4GB ram It runs fine and generates the PDF, Any idea what could be causing that and how can I resolve it so this one document works fine on the single core machine. The same template generates other documents fine its just one input xml that has a lot of text and images. Kindest regards Theresa Forster Senior Software Developer mailto:ther...@inbrand.co.uk ther...@inbrand.co.uk http://www.inbrand.co.uk/ www.inbrand.co.uk Tel: 01483 266500 IMPORTANT NOTE: This transmission has been sent by or on behalf of In Brand Software Ltd. The information in this transmission is for the intended addressee only and is confidential to that intended addressee. If either you know or you ought reasonably to conclude that you are not, or may not be, the intended addressee, you are hereby given notice that any unauthorised dissemination or copying of this transmission and any disclosure or use of the information transmitted is strictly prohibited and may be illegal. In such circumstances we ask for your assistance in notifying us immediately by e-mail, telephone or letter. InBrand Software Ltd Registered in England No. 5131004 Registered Office: The Old Barn, Ewhurst Road, Cranleigh GU6 7EF image001.png
Extended characters not rendered using FOP 1.0
Using FOP 0.25, the rarr; (Unicode 2192) symbol was rendered OK in PDF. After moving to FOP 1.0, the right arrow symbol is not rendered. This is my XSL param: xsl:param name=body.font.familyHelvetica/xsl:param Has the way FOP handles extended characters changed since 0.20.5? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Extended-characters-not-rendered-using-FOP-1.0-tp32494019p32494019.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Help PCL - FOP
Am 19.09.2011 13:03, schrieb Everson Rogério: I'm generating PCL files with XML and XSL files using FOP-1.0 in Java. ... Now, I need to insert more PCL commands in pcl file generated? For example, commands to choose the form that should be used, running macros and other things. Is it possible insert this commands in XML or XSL files? Short answer: don't try. There is no easy, documented way to get arbitrary stuff from the XML/XSLT source into the resulting PCL. You might have a look at one of the PCL editors out there for post-processing. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Extended characters not rendered using FOP 1.0
Am 19.09.2011 12:56, schrieb mike 675: Using FOP 0.25, the rarr; (Unicode 2192) symbol was rendered OK in PDF. After moving to FOP 1.0, the right arrow symbol is not rendered. This is my XSL param: xsl:param name=body.font.familyHelvetica/xsl:param Has the way FOP handles extended characters changed since 0.20.5? There have been a lot of changes between 0.20.5 and 1.0, although Unicode characters should be displayed properly, provided FOP can find a font containing a glyph for the character. Did you get an error or warning message? What does not rendered mean precisely: is there a blank instead of the arrow, another character, or is it completely omitted? Does your Helvetica font contain a glyph for the U+2192 (check with a font viewer or font editor, if in doubt), or did you override the font locally (with something other than font=Symbol) Check http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.0/fonts.html and in particular http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/1.0/fonts.html#missing-glyphs for further details. I also notice that you use DocBook, it may be necessary to adjust some parameters to tell the style sheets you are using FOP 1.0 now. You'll probably have to ask on the DocBook Apps list for details. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Understanding Following-Sibling
Hello. Could somebody please explain the following code I found in a .fo file. Here is my XML file. RCDATA RCDATALINE RCZE/RC RCANSIW1/RCANSI TRC/ RCREDUCTION 5878.14/RCREDUCTION RCOVERRIDE/ RCMODIFIED/ /RCDATALINE RCDATALINE RCNR/RC RCANSI45/RCANSI TRC/ RCREDUCTION 0.00/RCREDUCTION RCOVERRIDE/ RCMODIFIED/ /RCDATALINE Here is the Following-sibling statement: xsl:if test=/doc/EOB/DETAIL/DETAILLINE/RCDATA/RCDATALINE/RC[.!='']/following- sibling::*[.=''] and /doc/EOB/DETAIL/DETAILLINE/RCDATA/RCDATALINE/RC[.! ='']/following-sibling::*[.!='Y'] My understanding of following-sibling::* is that the test is checking the (first RC element and it it's not '' (empty) and the following siblings (RCANSI, TRC, RCREDUCTION, RCOVERRIDE, RCMODIFIED) are = '' (empty)) AND (first RC element and it it's not '' (empty) and the following siblings (RCANSI, TRC, RCREDUCTION, RCOVERRIDE, RCMODIFIED) are not = 'Y'. With the values above the condition is met and a block of code executed but I don't understand how the first part of the test can be true since some of the following-siblings are not = ''. Thanks, Rita - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Re: Understanding Following-Sibling
On 09/19/2011 07:48 PM, Rita Greenberg wrote: Hello. Could somebody please explain the following code I found in a .fo file. Here is my XML file. RCDATA RCDATALINE RCZE/RC RCANSIW1/RCANSI TRC/ RCREDUCTION 5878.14/RCREDUCTION RCOVERRIDE/ RCMODIFIED/ /RCDATALINE RCDATALINE RCNR/RC RCANSI45/RCANSI TRC/ RCREDUCTION 0.00/RCREDUCTION RCOVERRIDE/ RCMODIFIED/ /RCDATALINE Here is the Following-sibling statement: xsl:if test=/doc/EOB/DETAIL/DETAILLINE/RCDATA/RCDATALINE/RC[.!='']/following- sibling::*[.=''] and /doc/EOB/DETAIL/DETAILLINE/RCDATA/RCDATALINE/RC[.! ='']/following-sibling::*[.!='Y'] My understanding of following-sibling::* is that the test is checking the (first RC element and it it's not '' (empty) and the following siblings (RCANSI, TRC, RCREDUCTION, RCOVERRIDE, RCMODIFIED) are = '' (empty)) AND (first RC element and it it's not '' (empty) and the following siblings (RCANSI, TRC, RCREDUCTION, RCOVERRIDE, RCMODIFIED) are not = 'Y'. With the values above the condition is met and a block of code executed but I don't understand how the first part of the test can be true since some of the following-siblings are not = ''. First, this is not a question for the FOP list, since this is strictly an XSLT (or rather XPath) question. An xsl:if test doesn't check all the nodes, but the existence of _some_ nodes that pass the test. A parent/descendant selector doesn't pick the first node of type descendant, but one that does fit in the whole expression. The following-sibling axis, as explained on http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/#axes , refers to all the nodes that are children of the same parent and follow the current node. So, the whole test checks that: - there are any RC nodes that have some text in them - and they have at least one following sibling that is empty (this is true for the TRC node) AND, distinctly: - there are any RC nodes that have some text in them (it doesn't have to be the same node as in the above condition) - and they have at least one following sibling that doesn't have Y as their content (and this is again true for every sibling node in your example) Overall, I think that the whole test is wrong, since it never tries to relate to the context node. What you probably want is to put this condition in a template that is already on the RCDATALINE, and continue testing from that point on with ./RC instead of going from the root with /doc/.. Thanks, Rita -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
