Re: New experimental hyphenation patterns

2009-11-27 Thread J.Pietschmann

On 26.11.2009 09:56, Simon Pepping wrote:

hyphenation code=de use=de_1901/


Yes.


I'm a bit behind on the hyphenation front, but I thought the kind
of classes used in TeX hyphenation patterns aren't of much use
if the patterns use Unicode. There is a Unicode standard for
parsing words out of text:
  http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundaries
aren't we using this already?


We do not use that. It is my impression that classes are required for
being able to build the hyphenation tree. Is that not so?


Well, I looked it up. Classes are used to map several code points
like upper/lower case of a character to a single character for
the hyphenation pattern, a kind of normalization.

J.Pietschmann

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: New experimental hyphenation patterns

2009-11-26 Thread Simon Pepping
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 11:30:54PM +0100, J.Pietschmann wrote:
 On 25.11.2009 21:40, Simon Pepping wrote:
 When a language uses various alternative spelling rules, some
 descriptive suffix is appended to the file name, e.g. de_1901; users
 who prefer these pattern files over the default ones will have to
 rename the pattern files in the jar file.
 
 Hmm. I'd rather invent a FOP configuration for mapping the language(s)
 given in the FO to hyphenation pattern names.

That is a good idea. Something like:

hyphenation code=de use=de_1901/
 
 Classes: ...  Since 3 September 2009 these classes are built into
 FOP.
 
 I'm a bit behind on the hyphenation front, but I thought the kind
 of classes used in TeX hyphenation patterns aren't of much use
 if the patterns use Unicode. There is a Unicode standard for
 parsing words out of text:
  http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundaries
 aren't we using this already?

We do not use that. It is my impression that classes are required for
being able to build the hyphenation tree. Is that not so?

Simon

-- 
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.eu

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: New experimental hyphenation patterns

2009-11-25 Thread J.Pietschmann

On 25.11.2009 21:40, Simon Pepping wrote:

When a language uses various alternative spelling rules, some
descriptive suffix is appended to the file name, e.g. de_1901; users
who prefer these pattern files over the default ones will have to
rename the pattern files in the jar file.


Hmm. I'd rather invent a FOP configuration for mapping the language(s)
given in the FO to hyphenation pattern names.


Classes: ...  Since 3 September 2009 these classes are built into
FOP.


I'm a bit behind on the hyphenation front, but I thought the kind
of classes used in TeX hyphenation patterns aren't of much use
if the patterns use Unicode. There is a Unicode standard for
parsing words out of text:
 http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr29/#Word_Boundaries
aren't we using this already?

J.Pietschmann

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org