May be post a fo snippet showing what you give to fop and then describe your
expected and the actual output.
Thank you for your answer!
I am using FOP 0.95 (latest stable at the time of writing).
I am trying the following fo snippet.
fo:block
This
Hello
I am using FOP 0.95 (latest stable at the time of writing) and trying the
following FO file.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8?
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
fo:layout-master-set
fo:simple-page-master page-width=210mm page-height=297mm
Thank you - yes it does make it more clear.
The # is an indication that the font your are using has no matching glyph
for the non breaking hyphen.
From your initial post I incorrectly assumed that the problem was incorrect
line breaking behaviour of the non breaking hyphen. Obviously that is not
Hi,
kkapelon freemail gr wrote:
Hello
I am using FOP 0.95 (latest stable at the time of writing) and trying the
following FO file.
snip/
I then convert it to PDF with
fop -fo minimal.xml minimal.PDF
Expected output
Either (option 1):
A PDF file with two pages with Text on
Fellow FOP users,
I am looking for some help in an issue I am investigating for one of my clients
that actually doesn't appear to have much to do with FOP at all. However,
since there's a good chance that someone on this list knows more than I do
about how fonts map to glyphs in PostScript, I
I need to clarify something I have below. It should be this:
when that PDF is ran through a PostScript interpreter (Preview SDK from Liberty
Systems) and sent to the printer, the accented characters are mangled on the
printed output.