Hi all,
Just a heads up on the status of all of the upcoming releases:
- 1.15.4
- After doing all the cherry-picks, 1.15.stable went red in Jenkins
https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4827 fixes it, after
that is merged we should be able to start the usual build
The easiest way to get the recent Gemfile.lock is to look at the build
artifacts in jenkins jobs
(also useful when investigating sudden test failures):
http://ci.theforeman.org/job/test_develop/database=postgresql,ruby=2.4,slave=fast/
-- Ivan
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Ivan Necas
What errors are you seeing. I've tried with ruby 2.2.2, and 2.3.1
bundler 1.15.4, everything worked fine.
What gem --version do you have?
Anything in `bundler.d/Gemfile.local.rb` that could be causing this?
-- Ivan
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hey,
Ewoud:
About rack endpoint: It should be created for use case 2, where the check
is running in "online"-ish mode.
I prefer creating it as a microservice for scalability reasons, so I
wouldn't want to tie it too tightly with foreman-templates. Besides that,
tying it into foreman-templates will
Hey,
when I do fresh foreman clone with clean Ruby version (tried 2.0.0 and
2.4.1), bundle install is not able to resolve dependencies and loops
forever. I am using latest stable bundler, tried also pre1 version.
Can someone confirm and provide a workaround? I think copying
Gemfile.lock from
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:05:49PM -0700, ssht...@redhat.com wrote:
First attempt to create a design. It's an open discussion, everyone who
wants to chime in, please do.
The engine: will be deployed as a separate gem. My name suggestion
the-detective
First, I don't think that this service has any secret information that
should be kept under authorization/authentication.
Even if we assume that some level of auth is indeed needed, the easiest way
to implement it would be through Rack middleware.
If the service is added to an application with
How would be the authentication/authorization work with this approach?
- - Ivan
On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:05 PM, wrote:
>
> First attempt to create a design. It's an open discussion, everyone who
> wants to chime in, please do.
>
> The engine: will be deployed as a separate