Re: [foreman-dev] Be sure to import your product content data for Katello 3.6

2017-12-19 Thread JT
It should be run on dev boxes that were built before the installer was updated [1]. Regarding the foreman-tasks: I suppose that we actually do not need to require foreman-tasks to be running in order to run that rake task. If I recall correctly it did work fine for me so long as I had the rails

Re: [foreman-dev] Introducing #theforeman-dev-ui, an experiment

2017-12-19 Thread Walden Raines
> BTW I can add it to the Matrix Foreman community if you OP me on the > channel. You'll have to talk to Ohad about that, he's the only one with ops currently. > Facilitate, yes. Also could potentially exclude people too, especially > if they don't see this thread. If this channel persists after

Re: [foreman-dev] Be sure to import your product content data for Katello 3.6

2017-12-19 Thread Walden Raines
Is this also meant to be ran on dev boxes? I don't have foreman-tasks running so I get the following: 2017-12-20T02:58:34 [app] [W] foreman-tasks service not running or is not ready yet Thanks, Walden On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Jonathon Turel wrote: > > > On Thursday,

Re: [foreman-dev] Re: Friday tip of the day: use 'jq' to parse json

2017-12-19 Thread Derek Wright
You can access the value directly as if it were a javascript property: jq -r .value - Check the online docs, there are tons of options for mapping/fitlering/selecting/etc... This is probably thee best tool for working with api's on the command line. Also getting back to your actual question, use

[foreman-dev] Re: Friday tip of the day: use 'jq' to parse json

2017-12-19 Thread James Shewey
Any idea how to make the output pipe-able? Eg: echo '{"value": "New", "onclick": "CreateNewDoc()"}' | jq works well and, as expected, I get: { "value": "New", "onclick": "CreateNewDoc()" } But I can't pipe that output to anything else and if I do: echo '{"value": "New", "onclick":

[foreman-dev] Code owners attempt 2

2017-12-19 Thread Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden
Hello all, A while ago I proposed code owners for the packaging files. We tried this[1] but didn't work in our setup. It turns out that those mentioned as owners need permissions on the repository. In our case the packaging team (not individual members) has no permission. There are 3

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to allow public access to finish templates?

2017-12-19 Thread Timo Goebel
Hi Martin, Check out the foreman_userdata plugin. That might be what you need. It was made to make vmware image deployments more fun. The README on github has more detail. Timo > On 19. Dec 2017, at 11:48, 'Martin Juhl' via foreman-dev > wrote: > > Hi > > >

[foreman-dev] Review of all our logrotate configuration

2017-12-19 Thread Lukas Zapletal
Hey, I spent some time reviewing logrotate scripts because we had some reports on logrotation when SELinux was preventing it. TL;DR - resolved the issue, filed temporary fix for our policy and RHEL BZ. Comments below: /var/log/foreman/*.log Works ok, copy and truncate.

[foreman-dev] Possible to allow public access to finish templates?

2017-12-19 Thread 'Martin Juhl' via foreman-dev
Hi I’m trying to get Linux Image deployments with vmware to work, without SSH… Is it possible to allow public access (preferrably IP-based) to the finish templates??? right now I need a login to see them…??? Thanks Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

[foreman-dev] Pull request github template proposal

2017-12-19 Thread Lukas Zapletal
I created the following proposal: https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/5099/files I tried to keep it short and simple. Please comment. -- Later, Lukas @lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from