Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish)

+1 On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:54 PM, Dmitri Dolguikh wrote: > Another +1 from me -- quite like the UI, email integration seems to be (or > will be?) good enough. As long as the amount of maintenance isn't too big, > I think the move is a good idea. > -d > > On Wed, Nov

Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish)

Another +1 from me -- quite like the UI, email integration seems to be (or will be?) good enough. As long as the amount of maintenance isn't too big, I think the move is a good idea. -d On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:05 AM, John Mitsch wrote: > Also a +1 from me. Among other

Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish) - inbound email

> I will update the direct-category and reply-to addresses (the > foreman.discourse+(token)@gmail.com one) to be correct later today, > but be aware it will break reply-to addresses in existing mails - > sorry, unavoidable but entirely worthwhile. Quick update on the email record stuff. These

Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish)

Also a +1 from me. Among other things, I like the categories, markdown support, and tags. John Mitsch Red Hat Engineering (860)-967-7285 irc: jomitsch On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Sebastian Gräßl wrote: > I am one of the (silent) +1 voices Greg mentioned. > >

Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish)

I am one of the (silent) +1 voices Greg mentioned. Discourse would be a very welcomed move for me, there are a number of reasons, which Greg already mentioned as well. For me the one key reason is the possibility to have multiple categories to have discussions and share information in a

Re: [foreman-dev] Discourse summary week 2 (ish)

On 15/11/17 13:58, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > I AM STRONGLY AGAINST *MIGRATING* OUR MAILING LISTS TO ANY KIND OF > FORUM. I have included your opinion in both summaries. As a long standing member of the community, your vote does carry some weight - but shouting doesn't get you an extra one, and