On 12/20, Walden Raines wrote:
> I also added an item to the Team UX backlog to make the notifications use
> websockets (or similar) instead of the polling. The polling annoys me as
> well.
Definitely the way to go, I've been experimenting with ActionCable and
it's not only cleaner (way less code
I also added an item to the Team UX backlog to make the notifications use
websockets (or similar) instead of the polling. The polling annoys me as
well.
Cheers,
Walden
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Tomas Strachota
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
> >
> >
> > On We
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Ohad Levy wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> while I agree that notifications is useful feature to our users, its
>> one second polling mechanism is killing me during development, it
>> makes watching logs or de
> 2. do you know that there is a global env already? just run:
>
> NOTIFICATIONS_POLLING=100 foreman start
I hereby withdraw my proposal, this works for me. Quite hidden one :)
--
Later,
Lukas @lzap Zapletal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"f
On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while I agree that notifications is useful feature to our users, its
> one second polling mechanism is killing me during development, it
> makes watching logs or debugging sessions a nightmare.
>
> I propose an Administer - Sett
