Hello,
labels might help so +1 for that. I plan to send a PR with new directory
structure as discussed at [1] soon. It might help the bot to just check the
directories of touched files.
[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/foreman-dev/bzfBWEtIMpg
--
Marek
On pátek 13. ledna 2017
+1 for keeping the macros. IMHO, just because we did something a certain
way for a long time should not prevent us from changing it if there are
reasons for a change. This is also not the first change in core that
affected plugin(s) in a negative way and I doubt it will be the last.
Breaking
I feel actually quite the opposite, we used to have Hound via some
external service and this feels much better integrated. Since github
introduced reviews, Hound integration could take advantage of it in
the future? They will implode once a review is confirmed, that could
help.
On the other hand,
I am also for keeping the change but giving more attention to the
upgrades and providing some tooling to convert existing templates.
LZ
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:05 PM, Daniel Lobato Garcia
wrote:
> Hi foreman devs,
>
> Just noticed today
Hi All ,
PuppetDB plugin has new version which bring a lot of interesting parameters
to get puppetdb.4.3 working properly . like ssl-ca and etc. Please can
someone send me docs how to add (or create pull request) to this params. If
you have time enough to do that it`s also perfect for me .
Thanks Greg, that's what I want to work on this week :-)
More on this topic, we already have integration of Foreman Bootdisk
with VMWare. You create new VM, that gets Bootdisk attached as an ISO
file automatically and boots into Anaconda directly without PXE or
DHCP. This might be interesting for
Hi,
I think that while there are benefits to moving away from the host object,
we have a de-facto API based on it.
A way to change without breaking user's template would be to use a "proxy"
object that maintains the same endpoints and allows adding functionality or
handling changes in the
Hi,
I recently started identifying problematic areas in Permissions and Roles,
especially with regard to plugins. Foreman provides 'Viewer' and 'Manager'
roles out of the box and users expect these roles to work for plugins as
well. But plugins generally do not add their permissions to core's
Hello
The discussion has diverged into something different. People agree we should
add an extra layer but implemented through proxy objects. It's also clear no
one starts actively working on this right now. At the same time I want to add
new macro, let's say rpm_distro? which returns
Hi All,
I'm generally interested if it is possible to access from within a
foreman_plugin data from Katello plugin (plugin accesses data from other
plugin).
For example I would like to extract the content-view/asigned repository
information for a given host.
regards,
Daniel
--
You received
10 matches
Mail list logo