Re: [foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.0.2 (Saison) Released

Can you run: systemctl start httpd journalctl -xn On Jul 8, 2016 7:05 AM, "Edgars M." wrote: > Hi > > Here it is: > > sudo /bin/systemctl start httpd.service > Job for httpd.service failed because the control process exited with > error code. See "systemctl status

Re: [foreman-users] Re: How do I re-create a previously deleted host that was auto-created via puppet?

Taking each question separately: 1) You can just run Puppet again on your hosts, and they will be recreated in the UI just as before. There's no difference to Foreman whether a host has been around for 5 minutes or 5 months - when it sees a report from an unknown host, it'll create an entry for

[foreman-users] Re: How do I re-create a previously deleted host that was auto-created via puppet?

To be clear: The Foreman does not allow me to manually create a host. Why not? Because it wants to provision a host. This is kind of stupid, and I dont understand why the foreman needs to act as both ENC *and* provisioner. These are related, but separate roles. It would be nice if I could

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Katello 3.0.2 (Saison) Released

No, there is nothing special about our certificates. No wildcard, no even SAN. 2048 bits. Why is Crane needed? Can I disable it? Can I disable everything related to Puppet as we don't need that functionality? I just tested it and it failed again, here is my full install command: sudo

[foreman-users] Katello 3 Installation failed cause of dependencies

Hi, i was trying to install "katello.noarch 0:3.0.0-9.el7" but no luck here. Installation can not resolve all dependencies, is it a bug? See install.log. I would appreciate any help. Best regards, Denis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman

Re: [foreman-users] [Katello 3.0] foreman-installer --help fails ("no documentation found for manifest")

I have created an issue, available at http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/15619 - Thank you very much for looking into this! Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016 20:28:57 UTC+2 schrieb Eric Helms: > > Please report as an issue with your traceback so that the right developers > can take a look. > >

Re: [foreman-users] Repository priorities

W dniu 07.07.2016 o 20:25, Eric D Helms pisze: > There is no support for configuring this today; however, given the votes of > that feature request we can take it into consideration for the 3.2 release. > If you have use cases outside of setting it through the activation key as > that particular