Re: [foreman-users] provisioning interface is private - how to assign a routed IP?

! On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:49 AM, <rai...@ultra-secure.de> wrote: > Am 2017-12-18 10:21, schrieb Lukas Zapletal: >> >> Hello, >> >> you are doing it right. And yes, the general advice is to setup mirror >> (Katello/Pulp backend can help you with that a lo

Re: [foreman-users] provisioning interface is private - how to assign a routed IP?

Hello, you are doing it right. And yes, the general advice is to setup mirror (Katello/Pulp backend can help you with that a lot if you use RPMs and there's plugin for SUSE), or you can mirror manually. Now, Foreman is able to configure two or more ifaces, you pick one as primary which holds the

Re: [foreman-users] Can Foreman support Deploying Windows images into Bare Metal?

We have several users doing that, check demos from this year, we had one or two demos around this topic. LZ On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:04 AM, shrek maxi wrote: > If it does. How? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Foreman

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman Internal DB assigned ip space issue

Hello, there is no contract that you are getting same numbers for IPv4 and 6. This is not a bug, feel free to send RFE or patch to do this. We have new Random IPAM generator that returns pseudo random IPs seeded by MAC address of the device. Basically it will always return you same IP address

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman / Katello and Redhat Licensing

It will be best to talk to Red Hat representative about this, but from the project perspective - you can do whatever you want as long as this is aligned with open source licenses we use. Check all your plugins and backends you want to use, but the biggest ones are:

Re: [foreman-users] Unable to join server to Katello

Hello, the error message says it all. Your client does not know server's certificate. Import it, it's available in http://katello/pub for download. LZ On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:58 AM, Philippe Conway wrote: > Hello, > > I am having issues joining a server to our

Re: [foreman-users] Re: [discovery auto-provision] OS parameters ignored when hostgroup parameter present

gt; (auto-provision vs location). > > Regards! > > W dniu środa, 29 listopada 2017 14:47:41 UTC+1 użytkownik Lukas Zapletal > napisał: >> >> Does the user who initiates the auto provisioning have "view_params" >> permission? >> >> If you start fo

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Changing the default Provisioning Method to Image Based

That is not part of hostgroup I guess, so you need to select it everytime. That would be a RFE? LZ On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 12:11 AM, Andre Mosin wrote: > Did anybody figure out how to change the set a default Provisioning Method? > I am trying to change to Boot disk based

Re: [foreman-users] Re: [discovery auto-provision] OS parameters ignored when hostgroup parameter present

Does the user who initiates the auto provisioning have "view_params" permission? If you start foreman-rake console and type: Host.find(ID).host_param('param_name') for the already provisioned host, do you get the expected result there? Can you comment out line "return cached_host_params unless

Re: [foreman-users] Feedback wanted - migrate mailing lists to a forum?

Yeah, I was thinking something very small and grey - opposite of distracting big blue button. LZ On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Ivan Necas <ine...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 at 10:01, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> >> The

Re: [foreman-users] Feedback wanted - migrate mailing lists to a forum?

>> The most annoying is the big blue button for me, I'd prefer some >> small light-gray link instead (if any). > > As I say, I only see that in HTML-view, are you definitely in plaintext > mode? I am not actually, I migrated from Mutt to GMail recently and I have no option other than HTML here.

Re: [foreman-users] Cluster installation CentOS 7.4 network problems

Hello, I never heard of these and I can confirm we haven't changed much around this in the last release, as you can see our kickstart simply use default network configuration, thus NetworkManager. I think you need to reach out to CentOS groups or better test on RHEL and create Bugzilla for

Re: [foreman-users] Feedback wanted - migrate mailing lists to a forum?

e to do per-user, which is > even better (again, flexibility to interact with the community as each > user wants to). > > OK, specific answers: > > On 21/11/17 15:09, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> 1) Edits are not propagated to e-mail only users, I edited a post >> andneve

Re: [foreman-users] Feedback wanted - migrate mailing lists to a forum?

Greg, I gave Discourse another try via e-mail but I have some issues: 1) Edits are not propagated to e-mail only users, I edited a post and never got an e-mail about this. If this is a feature (I don't get notification on my own edits), that's fine, but otherwise this creates a huge hole as you

[foreman-users] Foreman Discovery Image 3.4.2 is out

Hey, I pushed new minor version of FDI yesterday. It includes one annoying bug fix: Fixes #20603 - Disable kernel messages on tty1 It also adds small package called "kbd" which will be used in the future to switch overe to tty2 during kexec to prevent terminal freezing. Fixes #20548 - added

Re: [foreman-users] Discovery iso: Missing EFI file (/boot/efi/EFI/*/gcdx64.efi)

I am on latest stable Fedora, haven't done anything special, but this is my development instance, I might have some packages that clean installation don't have. It should be as easy as: https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-discovery-image#building Quick look into yum/dnf database shows this

Re: [foreman-users] How to display IPMI consoles in the Foreman?

I can do the discovery part, but frankly not fully understand what exactly how do we grab the fact value. Is that some value that needs to be fetched from iDRAC API? LZ On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Konstantin Lepikhov wrote: > Hi Greg! > > On 10/27/2017, at 10:25:20 AM

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman - Solaris 11 install

Glad you sorted it out. We do appreciate tutorials, blog posts, puppet PRs for the installer or simply just community-templates you are using for provisioning. Currently we only have this in the codebase:

Re: [foreman-users] Re: WebSock error: [object Event]

n.R <subup...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Lzap, > Thanka for your reply. I'm following the same article,but not able to get > the console for libvirt, getting the same error.can you help me to trace the > issue? > > On Oct 26, 2017 7:25 PM, "Lukas Zapletal" <l..

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

e only thing > worked for me so far was to periodically go through discovered hosts and > remove duplicate entries. > > Thanks! > Konstantin. > > On Oct 26, 2017, at 07:18, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Ok this confirms it. http://projects.theforeman

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Ok this confirms it. http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/21479 we will fix later. We don't have an unique index on DB level, just in Rails level and a second NIC with same MAC can sneak in. The relevant code in core is: validate :mac_uniqueness, :if => Proc.new { |nic| nic.managed? &&

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Foreman - Solaris 11 install

ger cooperating 'Can't start OMAPI protocol: address not > available'. I've tried deleting all relevant hosts and emptying out the > dhcpd.leases file, rebooting both Foreman master and proxy. Nothing seems to > work. Is the information being stored somewhere else? > > On Wedne

Re: [foreman-users] Is there a way to update Hosts details after provisioned from AutoProvision using Discovery Plugin?

SJq4WtjlD68QB9AT4ACLcBGAs/s1600/3.png> > > > > > <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-0kifxZbRyaI/WfEHx9VlCRI/AFM/WczGZjTR21IxqCjx1SroBxO5mh9wriSewCLcBGAs/s1600/4.png> > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > On Wednesday, October 25

Re: [foreman-users] Re: WebSock error: [object Event]

Please read: https://theforeman.org/manuals/1.15/index.html#7.1NoVNC and follow the instructions there. LZ On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Subramaniyan .R <subup...@gmail.com> wrote: > i have used libvirt, > > On Wednesday, 25 October 2017 19:14:34 UTC+5:30, Lukas Zapletal wr

Re: [foreman-users] Discovery iso: Missing EFI file (/boot/efi/EFI/*/gcdx64.efi)

Worked for me on Fedora, do a PR and I can add those files into the official build. LZ On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:16 PM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello, we do only build on Fedora, the livecd tooling in RHEL7 might > be little bit outdated. > > What is t

Re: [foreman-users] Discovery iso: Missing EFI file (/boot/efi/EFI/*/gcdx64.efi)

Hello, we do only build on Fedora, the livecd tooling in RHEL7 might be little bit outdated. What is the reason for shim/efibootloader in discovery image? You want SecureBoot over PXE? LZ On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Oleg Mcnoleg wrote: > Hello, > > I'm rolling my

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Hmm is this Debian? Should work. LLZ On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 2:50 AM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via Foreman users wrote: > >> OK, thanks, Lukas! As soon as I get that duplicate entries show up again, >> I'll run above and provide a result here. After patching for

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Foreman - Solaris 11 install

Hey Trisha, the error smells like a name resolution error, have you checked DNS? Does the DHCP server provide correct DNS info, so the system can resolve installation media or other services involved in provisioning? Now, the DHCP is really expected to just work. Are you using the ISC DHCP

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Accessing Katello Repos on another Katello Server

Yep, you can also set them to be published via HTTP only (no certificate needed). LZ On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Jasper Connery wrote: > Looks like it is possible. Initially ran into problems due to cross-domain > issues, but I have now got it working. > > Assigned the

Re: [foreman-users] How to customize the facts from the Foreman discovery Image / use them in provisioning templates?

Autoprovisioning rule lets you use ERB to construct hostname. Normal provisioning does not. You can however change fact that construct the name. You can create FDI extension (ZIP FILE) which will be downloaded during discovery, that can add any fact you want using Facter API. All facts are

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman SmartProxy - Standalone usage

Absolutely, the API is not much documented, it is a Sinatra App so just read the code. LZ On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 4:09 PM, xakraz wrote: > Hello, > > > I have a question regarding the usage of Foreman SmartProxies as standalone > pieces without TheForeman. > > We have a setup

Re: [foreman-users] Discovered hosts using Discovery Plugin

It is possible, read the manual. LZ On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:01 PM, No1 wrote: > Hi, > > Is there way to alter the look/ columns that are being displayed under the > discovered hosts? > > Currently, it shows the Names with Mac address of the PXE NiC Interface > with

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Ideally I would like to see DEBUG and SQL logs for that transactions, but thats flooding your production server. In the console with both records presnet do something like: ::Nic::Managed.where(:mac => "MA:CA:DDRESS::", :primary => true) On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:08 PM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via

Re: [foreman-users] How to blacklist certain interfaces from being imported

Hello, every puppet or rhsm fact update will add all missing NICs but never delete existings. You can turn off this behavior, it's a global setting not sure how its named but it will prevent from any NIC to be created by facts. LZ On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 1:32 PM, 'Christian Schulze-Wiehenbrauk'

Re: [foreman-users] Re: TFTP is not working with the foreman after installed discovery plugin

This patch I am working on will make this much easier! https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4891 On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:53 AM, No1 wrote: > The Issue is resolved. > > But It would be nice not to touch the custom configs that were made into the > TFTP and DHCP

Re: [foreman-users] Discovery plugin removes DHCP feature?

October 11, 2017 at 4:47:07 AM UTC-4, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> No, something happened to DHCP module, check proxy.log and look into >> initialization phase. >> >> Typically, when you perform upgrade of dhcp or tftp daemons (via >> yum/apt), they will reset permissi

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman Discovery. Name of discovered hosts

https://www.theforeman.org/plugins/foreman_discovery/ It is all there. LZ On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Conor Mc Garvey wrote: > Hey, > > I'm looking to change the name of the discovered host to something more > recognisable. > > For the name I plan to combine the MAC

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman bootdisk and external DHCP

Hello, I have zero experience with Ubuntu/Debian preseed but you need to identify exactly at which stage you loose IP connection. My bet would be when the installer attempts to reconfigure network? Perhaps there is some log on virtual console 2 or higher where you can see this. FYI Preseed

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Oh now I understand, looks like a new bug. I am not able to reproduce with FDI 3.4.1 and develop Foreman. The code responsible for finding existing record is here: https://github.com/theforeman/foreman_discovery/blob/develop/app/models/host/discovered.rb#L53-L62 Theoretically if you changed

Re: [foreman-users] Discovery plugin removes DHCP feature?

No, something happened to DHCP module, check proxy.log and look into initialization phase. Typically, when you perform upgrade of dhcp or tftp daemons (via yum/apt), they will reset permissions on some files or directories which will cause DHCP module to fail to init. This will fix it: setfacl

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman bootdisk and external DHCP

Hey Craig and welcome here. Can you explain what happens in more detail? At which point you seem to lost IP address? You say you hit kickstart that would mean Anaconda was loaded up and initialized network, at this point there is almost nothing which could literally stop Anaconda from completing

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Hey I did not see any 422 error before this transaction so I think this is it. > Although I did not see any long MySQL queries, the whole transaction still > took ~11 seconds to complete for some reason: > Name has already been taken - this usually means that host (either discovered or managed

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman + Isc DHCP

We do support one subnet per installation via installer/puppet and multiple subnets via hiera.yaml. LZ On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Grace Thompson <barfingca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Any plans on enabling Subnet creations? > > - gracie mobile > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 11:

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Hello, please use git to find out which branches it landed in, I believe the MySQL facter patch is 1.15+ only. For 1.15.5 you need to talk with release engineer of this version which is Daniel, if the changes are small enough I see no reason not to include them. I think it's too late for 1.15.5

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Let us know next week if this helped. I highly suggest upgrade to 1.15, it is a very solid release. LZ On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:04 PM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via Foreman users wrote: > >> See the comment there, do you have this in your instance? If not git >>

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Ok I can see there is a subselect, these are sometimes painful particularly for MySQL. We fixed that already, see in fact_importer.rb (this is develop branch): def delete_removed_facts ActiveSupport::Notifications.instrument "fact_importer_deleted.foreman", :host_id => host.id, :host_name

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman + Isc DHCP

Hello, this page is pretty out of date (2013), you are not supposed to be installing these services manually, we have a puppet-based installer that does all the magic. If you do not want to use it, I recommend you to install foreman on a test server and then investigate the configuration files

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

for a long time (minutes to hours). Perhaps try to disable all foreman jobs and re-test. LZ On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:27 AM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via Foreman users <foreman-users@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 3:55:43 AM UTC-7, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >>

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

A MAC address can only exist once, if you already have a (managed/unmanaged) host and you try to discover a host with same MAC, you will get error. Depending on Foreman discovery it is either 422 or "Host already exists":

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Well no, the biggest update was for 1.14 there: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/9016 That focused on memory consumption tho, there was a little speedup but nothing big. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:05 PM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via Foreman users wrote: > BTW,

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

I would rather fix importing code to be faster than doing async, that is the last resort. Konstantin, thanks for analysis. Our import code is slow indeed, we improved it a bit in 1.14. Note we mostly test this on PostgreSQL. For each import, there is a log in INFO level about how much time was

Re: [foreman-users] Lots of "Mysql2::Error: Deadlock found when trying to get lock" under increased load

Hey, what kind of load do you have? Puppet? Facter? Is that ENC? Something else? Can you tell which requests are slow from logs or monitoring? LZ On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:35 AM, 'Konstantin Orekhov' via Foreman users wrote: > > Hi, all! > > Under increased

Re: [foreman-users] dhcp filename option for pxeboot of Power PC architecture

/ If this is the case, I think you want to create your host in Foreman with PXELinux BIOS flag and it will have filename option "pxelinux.0" which should be ignored by petitboot and then it will try to load the configuration from standard paths. On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:52 AM, Lukas Z

Re: [foreman-users] dhcp filename option for pxeboot of Power PC architecture

Danielle, I've talked to our Grub2/PXE/BOOTP/POWER experts, can you get us: dhcpd.conf grub.conf network comm dump (wireshark or similar) Thanks On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > First of all, is your PPC CLIENT big or little endian? I see it is

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman discovery image issue with UEFI client hosts

=boot/fdi-image/initrd0.img ... proxy.url=<%= > foreman_server_url %> proxy.type=foreman > IPAPPEND 2 > > > thanks and regards, > > Mrinmoy > > On Thursday, August 31, 2017 at 5:49:34 PM UTC+5:30, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Sorry please remove t

Re: [foreman-users] dhcp filename option for pxeboot of Power PC architecture

known. > Sep 1 10:44:32 srv-install dhcpd: none: host unknown. > Sep 1 10:44:38 srv-install dhcpd: DHCPRELEASE of 172.16.2.207 from > 70:e2:84:14:1c:13 via eno16780032 (not found) > > Without more info. > > From the client side I receive the messages: > > booting netboot enP5p7s0

Re: [foreman-users] dhcp filename option for pxeboot of Power PC architecture

Is this non-Red Hat OS? I mean the system that serves the DHCP/TFTP? > [root@srv-install grub2]# ln -s /var/lib/tftpboot/core.elf grubppc64le.efi TFTP runs in chroot, never do absolute symlinks, only relative. Not sure if this is same for non-RH OS tho. > Aug 31 17:47:54 srv-install

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman discovery image issue with UEFI client hosts

c > if [ -f "$configfile" ]; then > source "$configfile" > fi > > <%= snippet "pxegrub2_chainload" %> > ======= > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 29, 2017 at 3:30:55 PM UTC+5:30, Lukas Zapl

Re: [foreman-users] dhcp filename option for pxeboot of Power PC architecture

Hello, with recent versions of Foreman (1.14+) you set PXELoader to Grub2 EFI and then the filename will be grubppc64le.efi or grubppc64.efi depending on endian. Note the incorrect extension (PPC is not EFI compatible), we are tracking this under http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/16706 and

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman discovery image issue with UEFI client hosts

"$net_default_mac" > mac_dashed=${m1}-${m2}-${m3}-${m4}-${m5}-${m6} > > mac_configfile=$prefix/grub.cfg-01-$mac_dashed > source "$mac_configfile" > > 3. Please let me know how to collect this one as I am booting a VM in VMware > workstation as UEFI client.

Re: [foreman-users] No facts in Json input for hooks after foreman discovery

Hello, facts are not reported via hooks. LZ On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:37 PM, wrote: > Hello, > > The issue is that -> i dont see facts in input json after foreman discovers > a VM/baremetal. > > This is the workflow that i am trying with hooks and foreman discovery >

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman 'Finish template' not executed

back. What kind of template should I use then for my > needs? > > Some post-installation configurations? Like DNS, network, Proxy etc..? > > On Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 2:14:32 PM UTC+3, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> finish template only trigg

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman 'Finish template' not executed

Hello, finish template only triggers when compute_attributes.present? && image_build? && !image.try(:user_data) In other words, this is only meant for image based provisioning on virt or clouds. You may want to file a RFE if there is none present already. LZ On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 8:32 AM,

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman Host provisioning

Hello, Foreman can talk to various virtualizations like libvirt or oVirt, but not to Oracle Virtual VM unfortunately. What you need to do is to create new VM and write down the VM MAC address of the interface that is connected to network with Foreman. Do not start it. Then Create host,

Re: [foreman-users] Re: DHCP issues - UNABLE TO SAVE: Create DHCP Settings task failed

> [{"network":"192.168.196.0.0","netmask":"255.255.255.0","options":{"range":["192.168.0.201","192.168.0.254"]}}] This means DHCP proxy module now sees your network but I do not understand why it reads non-sense: 192.168.196.0.0 It should be: 192.168.0.0 Have you manually edited this line?

Re: [foreman-users] Re: DHCP issues - UNABLE TO SAVE: Create DHCP Settings task failed

Hello, the subnets in dhcp.yml look suspicious, why you have them there? Also these are not valid subnet addresses if I am not mistaken. Delete, restart foreman-proxy. Before you re-test verify that foreman-proxy see all subnet definitions in dhcpd.conf, that would be: curl -kvs --cert

Re: [foreman-users] iPXE Global Default

Conor, to be honest, I am really not sure what you are trying to do. We do have some iPXE support in Foreman, but this is mostly limited to iPXE template type, so you can use Foreman to generate its contents. If your intention is to have Foreman to supply custom DHCP filename option (e.g.

Re: [foreman-users] Foreman DB locks

I am shooting in the dark, but we have this cleanup cron job: # Expire old reports 30 7 * * * foreman/usr/sbin/foreman-rake reports:expire >>/var/log/foreman/cron.log 2>&1 It runs daily, so modify it to run weekly perhaps or schedule it into some quiet period if you have any as an

Re: [foreman-users] Provision atomic host using satellite

ne more thing i want to ask is, what is recommended way for doing post >> configuration of Atomic host, for example DNS,NTP, authentication .. can >> anyone guide me on this please? >> >> I think we can not install puppet for doing post configuration. >> >>

Re: [foreman-users] Provision atomic host using satellite

an not install puppet for doing post configuration. > > Thanks, > DJ > > > On Monday, 31 July 2017 13:44:43 UTC+5:30, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Dhaval, do you have a case opened? >> >> Are you using on-demand download policy for kickstart or ostree? >

Re: [foreman-users] Provision atomic host using satellite

Dhaval, do you have a case opened? Are you using on-demand download policy for kickstart or ostree? Have you added both kickstart and ostree into the same content view which is in use? LZ On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Unix SA wrote: > Hello, > > Is anyone using atomic

Re: [foreman-users] minor upgrade

You are not expected to do that, RPM packages do call db migration and seed automatically, but I always recommend to run puppet on *noop* mode to see the drift. foreman-installer --scenario katello -v -n LZ On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Johan Loubser wrote: > Hello > >

Re: [foreman-users] Create my own plugin using the example on the manual

Hello, what exactly is your problem? Try to describe in more detail, what you've provided is sparse. Assuming that you don't see your new plugin on About page, you need to follow steps of adding the plugin into Gemfile.local.rb as in

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Domain is not set from a host group

June 20, 2017 at 6:20:46 PM UTC+3, Ido Kaplan wrote: >> >> Not sure that I understand your reply. >> Is discovery plugin was released officially today? >> With a patch that solving the domain host group issue? >> >> Ido >> >> >> On 19 Jun 2017, a

Re: [foreman-users] execute hook script before template render

You can turn off safemode and then you have full Ruby interpreter at your hands in your template, just do <% anything_you_want_here %>, so you can make HTTP request or call an external script to generate the token for you (just make sure you update SELinux policy if on Red Hat to allow this). You

Re: [foreman-users] UEFI PXEBoot not downloading config file

uefi env. > > Please advise about previous question about templates. > > Regards > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 9:27:36 AM UTC+2, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Foreman now supports Grub1, Grub2 and PXELinux templates, you can pick >> anything you want. Note that G

Re: [foreman-users] Network provisioning failing

Hey, can you provide more details? Extract the boot configuration files from the ISO and attach, pastebin output of host detail CLI or screenshots of the host itself including NIC screen. LZ On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Renig Tra wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to

Re: [foreman-users] UEFI PXEBoot not downloading config file

visioning then? > > On Monday, June 19, 2017 at 9:27:36 AM UTC+2, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Foreman now supports Grub1, Grub2 and PXELinux templates, you can pick >> anything you want. Note that Grub1 does not support UEFI. >> >> If you install Smart Proxy

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Domain is not set from a host group

Scratchbuild link (built against 1.16-develop but that should not be problem for a quick test): http://koji.katello.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/7487/7487/tfm-rubygem-foreman_discovery-9.1.1-1.fm1_16.git.9.bd67811.git.9.bd67811.el7.noarch.rpm LZ On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Ido Kaplan

Re: [foreman-users] UEFI PXEBoot not downloading config file

Foreman now supports Grub1, Grub2 and PXELinux templates, you can pick anything you want. Note that Grub1 does not support UEFI. If you install Smart Proxy on a system where Grub1 or Grub2 is available, we generate the bootloader via the installer using mkgrub command. Usually only one of these

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Domain is not set from a host group

No ETA yet, you can use this scratchbuild it will work: http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6018 Report back if it fixes your issue. LZ On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:32 PM, Ido Kaplan wrote: > Ok, thank you for the update. > Is there a fix for this issue? > When it

Re: [foreman-users] discovered host not getting grub2 tftp files created for PXE after being discovered

. Thank you. > > > Thanks, > Robert Anderson > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> This (*) will be fixed in Discovery 9.1, we are delayed with the release >> due to issues with building infrastructure. S

Re: [foreman-users] Re: fqdn not getting appended to hostname pattern after discovered host transitions to All Hosts

> > The fqdn is still not being tacked on after being found and put into All > Hosts > > > Thanks, > Robert Anderson > > On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 7:02 AM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Domain should be included automatically when hostgroup you ass

Re: [foreman-users] discovered host not getting grub2 tftp files created for PXE after being discovered

This (*) will be fixed in Discovery 9.1, we are delayed with the release due to issues with building infrastructure. Stay tuned. (*) It's actually similar bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/19313 it's for auto-provisioning only. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 7:50 PM, Robert Anderson

Re: [foreman-users] can no longer provision discovered hosts

This will be fixed in Discovery 9.1, we are delayed with the release due to issues with building infrastructure. Stay tuned. LZ On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Asher Schaffer wrote: > Running foreman 1.15.0 on Ubuntu 16.04 > > Currently discovered hosts are showing up

Re: [foreman-users] Domain is not set from a host group

Will be fixed in Discovery 9.1, we are having some troubles with our builder so the update is delayed. LZ On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Ido Kaplan wrote: > Hi, > > Foreman version 1.14.3, Discovery plugin version 8.0.1. > > During provisioning a server with multiple

Re: [foreman-users] Re: fqdn not getting appended to hostname pattern after discovered host transitions to All Hosts

Domain should be included automatically when hostgroup you assign to it has it on primary interface. LZ On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Robert Anderson wrote: > by FQDN I mean Domain which is associated to the Host Group which is being > applied via the Discovery rule > >

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Cannot delete discovered host

Hey, known error in 1.14 series. Fixed in 1.15, discovery 9.1 tomorrow. LZ On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Robert Anderson wrote: > Alright. I got rid of it by trying to provision it and deleting it out of > All Hosts. > > > On Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at 1:34:50 PM

[foreman-users] How to use hostgroup provisioning with Katello 3.4

Hello, Foreman 1.15 or Katello 3.4 hostgroup (combination) provisioning allows "Satellite 5 - like" provisioning without registering hosts into system. Although Foreman offers much more flexible and better ways of provisioning including PXE, PXE-less, bootdisk or discovery, this is possible.

Re: [foreman-users] host CNAME creation

Our API endpoint did not change, just provide CNAME type. It's in /dns path, search in dns_api.rb. LZ On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:07 PM, justin parker wrote: > Based on the issue located here: > http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/17879 > > It looks like we can create

Re: [foreman-users] migrating networks being smartproxy controlled

Hey, so you want to create dynamic lease reservations for them, so they are then managable by Foreman? You can either manually edit dhcp.leases file and put them there (see other dhcpd.leases under foremans control for examples), or you can use DHCP API of the DHCP smart proxy to put the records

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Discovery Rules

Will fix this thanks. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Ido Kaplan wrote: > Thank you - it's working! > I suggest to edit the examples (4.3.2 Hostname patterns) in > https://theforeman.org/plugins/foreman_discovery/8.0/index.html > > > On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 8:45:17 PM

Re: [foreman-users] pxelinux.cfg file not created when using discovery plugin API

an_discovery/host_converter.rb appears to have fixed it! > Thank you > > On Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 2:52:08 AM UTC-6, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> >> Hello, might be also http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/19313 >> >> Try to comment out this line: >> >> &g

Re: [foreman-users] Fresh Foreman 1.15.0 install dhcp subnet issue...

It works here, here is my command: SATNET=122 --foreman-proxy-dhcp true \ --foreman-proxy-dhcp-interface virbr1 \ --foreman-proxy-dhcp-gateway=192.168.${SATNET}.1 \ --foreman-proxy-dhcp-range="192.168.${SATNET}.10 192.168.${SATNET}.109" \

Re: [foreman-users] VM provisioning fails with errors

The DNS server on Foreman does not have foreman A record, add it manually if this is what you want. I'd love to have this in our installer, but we don't have it. With katello plugin installed, you cannot workaround this with unattended_url anymore. LZ On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 8:57 PM, bijith

[foreman-users] Heads-up: Foreman 1.15 and Discovery

Hello, although I released Discovery 9.0 plugin for Foreman 1.15 compatibility, we are suffering from several blocker bugs around Provision Host (Edit Host) form, auto-provisionig, DHCP orchestration in Foreman and DHCP smart-proxy module. We are planning 9.1 release in the upcoming week or two.

Re: [foreman-users] provisioning a system with two NIC

the best place to start learning how to do this? > > On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 09:05 +0200, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in this case you want to leave default kickstart template "network" >> configuration as is and only change post configuration for

Re: [foreman-users] provisioning a system with two NIC

Hello, in this case you want to leave default kickstart template "network" configuration as is and only change post configuration for network: https://github.com/theforeman/community-templates/blob/develop/provisioning_templates/snippet/kickstart_networking_setup.erb This is a snippet that is

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Occasional ERF50-7522 on facts_refresh

You forgot the question mark, did you? Or maybe I did in the previous mail, anyway its really this: respond_to?(:reports) https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.4.1/Object.html#method-i-respond_to-3F LZ On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Konstantin Orekhov wrote: > >> unless new_host

Re: [foreman-users] Re: Occasional ERF50-7522 on facts_refresh

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Lukas Zapletal <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > unless new_host && hostgroup.nil? && reports.nil? && reports.empty? Sorry I mean: unless new_host && hostgroup.nil? && respond_to?(:reports) && reports.emp

  1   2   3   >