Re: [foreman-users] Re: Unattended_Url versus firewalls
> Does this setting on the Proxy make it's way into the Boot Disks? That's > how we have to provision at the moment. We're finding the central > unattended_url and foreman_url settings are used when creating the ISO > images. We can't use DHCP/PXE provisioning at all. Some network zones > don't even have DNS, so we have to use IP addresses to point at > Satellite/Proxy. Yes, use Host/Full host or special Subnet image in order to proxy through. -- Later, Lukas #lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[foreman-users] Re: Unattended_Url versus firewalls
Hi, I believe I have a similar setup to you that I have just got working. On the remote smart proxy I have :- /etc/foreman-proxy/settings.d/templates.yml :enabled: true :template_url: http://smartproxy1.remote.local:8000 /etc/foreman-proxy/settings.yml :http_port: 8000 Now I can generate a New Host associated with either Smart Proxy and verify that the /var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux.cfg/[mac-address] file has a ks argument pointing to the local Smart Proxy Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Foreman users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to foreman-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/foreman-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
