Bug#655055: rkhunter: a couple of (debian specific?) warnings
Hi Karl,
Le dimanche 08 janv. 2012 à 06:56:21 (+0100 CET), Karl Goetz a écrit :
Package: rkhunter
Version: 1.3.6-4
Severity: minor
Hi,
I've got a couple of comments after running rkhunter, hopefully you'll
agree they are bugs :)
* it warns that /sbin/chkconfig has been replaced by a script, but its
shipped as a (perl) script in debian. Could this be included in
SCRIPTWHITELIST please?
chkconfig is not widely used on Debian and the default rkhunter
configuration should take this into account. I would hence avoid adding this
even as a commented example.
* With etckeeper becoming popular, could the config example include
/etc/.etckeeper and /etc/.{git,bzr}ignore as comments in
ALLOWHIDDENDIR and ALLOWHIDDENFILE?
I have added them as comments in the default configuration file.
Cheers,
Julien
--
.''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org
: :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor
`. `'` http://www.kirya.net/
`- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1
___
forensics-devel mailing list
forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: Bug#634412: ext3grep: FTBFS: superblock.h:35:99: error: 'EXT2_FRAG_SIZE' was not, declared in this scope
Le samedi 10 déc. 2011 à 09:35:07 (+0100 CET), Julien Valroff a écrit : tags 634412 + pending thanks Hi Peter, Le samedi 10 déc. 2011 à 08:14:27 (+0100 CET), peter green a écrit : I just did a test build on current sid and ran into failures but they were different from the failure reported in the bug report. I guess the headers have changed again since this bug was reported. Anyway the attatched patch makes the code build in current sid. Thanks Peter for your help. I have pushed your patch to the git repository for the upcoming package upload. Could anyone familiar with ext3grep test the new release so that we can upload it to sid ASAP? ping The upload would fix 2 RC bugs. cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Bug#634412: ext3grep: FTBFS: superblock.h:35:99: error: 'EXT2_FRAG_SIZE' was not, declared in this scope
Le dimanche 08 janv. 2012 à 03:07:39 (+0100 CET), peter green a écrit : Thanks again for your patch. Everything seems to work OK but as I normally don't use ext3grep, I let regular users test by themselves and will then upload the package. It doesn't seem any regular users responded to your request, I tried to put the word out wider on debian-user and the debian forums but noone responded there either. Where do we go from here? I have pinged other members of the forensics team. As a user of ext3grep, do you want me to build packages that you could test? If so, which architecture? P.S. a duplicate of this bug has been filed, I guess the filer didn't spot this one because it was marked as pending. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654201 I have just forcibly merged these bugs. Cheers, Julien -- .''`. Julien Valroff ~ jul...@kirya.net ~ jul...@debian.org : :' : Debian Developer Free software contributor `. `'` http://www.kirya.net/ `- 4096R/ E1D8 5796 8214 4687 E416 948C 859F EF67 258E 26B1 ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Processed: forcibly merging 634412 654201
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: forcemerge 634412 654201 Bug#634412: ext3grep: FTBFS: superblock.h:35:99: error: 'EXT2_FRAG_SIZE' was not declared in this scope Bug#654201: ext3grep: FTBFS on armhf but also reproduced on amd64 sid build Forcibly Merged 634412 654201. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 634412: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=634412 654201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654201 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: FOSDEM
* Julien Valroff [Sat Jan 07, 2012 at 05:11:36PM +0100]: First, happy new year to all of you! +1 :) I won't be able to attend to FOSDEM this year, due to family events scheduled during this week-end. Oh hey - well, hope to see you at another event then :) Have fun there and keep us posted! Will do! FTR: I booked flight and hotel, so I should be able to join FOSDEM. :) regards, -mika- signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Processing of guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.changes
guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: guymager_0.5.9-2.dsc guymager_0.5.9-2.debian.tar.gz guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: guymager_0.5.9-2.debian.tar.gz to main/g/guymager/guymager_0.5.9-2.debian.tar.gz guymager_0.5.9-2.dsc to main/g/guymager/guymager_0.5.9-2.dsc guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.deb to main/g/guymager/guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.deb Override entries for your package: guymager_0.5.9-2.dsc - source utils guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.deb - optional utils Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 652170 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
guymager override disparity
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the override file for the following file(s): guymager_0.5.9-2_amd64.deb: package says section is x11, override says utils. Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell, httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video, xfce, zope. At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into these sections. If this is the case, please only reply to this email if the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package at the next upload. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload. If you feel the override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information. Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the following format: Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please. [NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail. Your bug needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.] -- Debian distribution maintenance software (This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org) ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
Re: afflib package - bug #645915
Le samedi 07 janvier 2012 à 17:10 +0100, Julien Valroff a écrit : Hi, Le mardi 27 déc. 2011 à 10:06:38 (+0100 CET), Christophe Monniez a écrit : Hi, I worked on this bug [1] to try to solve it. I did a build in a clean environment and found that it was not linked against libreadline. I've just requested a binNMU for i386 to fix the current situation. Once done, we will be able to at least lower the severity of the bug. I leave it up to you if you consider it should be closed or not. Thanks Julien, I will see once the package will be uploaded. The situation comes from an uploader build made in an unclean environment (the last upload was an NMU, hence independent on our work). I have also worked somehow on the package in git but not fixed all the lintian warnings (nor tested it all). I'm working on the other lintian warnings (man pages). BTW, is there any good reason you use git-dch? I find it very hard to follow the work because of it (but may be due to the fact I am not used to using it). Cheers, Julien Well, I have no good reason to use it. We really should update our workflow to see who works on what. It was once said that it's up to the uploader to maintain the changelog because it's automatically generated by git (I suppose git-dch). So, when I work on a package, I don't update the changelog, to not interfere with the uploader work. Am I wrong ? What is the good way of doing it ? -- Christophe Monniez christophe.monn...@fccu.be ___ forensics-devel mailing list forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/forensics-devel
