The trigger in your Debian packages

2011-06-11 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, you're maintaining a Debian package which provides a trigger file. Currently a package that activates a trigger is put in the triggers-awaited status where it doesn't fulfill dependencies. The trigger must first be processed and only then is the package considered as installed. I believe

Re: Mass forensics-devel unsubscribes?

2014-01-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014, Michael Prokop wrote: or a domain which uses googlemail for their MX). Because gmail is *rejecting* mails that they think are spam this results in mails being bounced and as a result the mailing lists sets those gmail(-related) mail addresses to unsubscribe. Just verified

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-06-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tim wrote: Yeah, it's sad. I need some one to *help* me package it and take ownership of the packaging. There's very little maintenance at this point, since there's not really any active feature development and infrequent releases. It's just a matter of getting

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-06-05 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi Tim, On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Wed, 03 Jun 2015, Tim wrote: Yeah, it's sad. I need some one to *help* me package it and take ownership of the packaging. There's very little maintenance at this point, since there's not really any active feature development

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-06-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 05 Jun 2015, Tim wrote: Ok, that makes sense. Right now the python library installation is all lumped in with the install target. You could build binaries without interference, but once you tried to install just certain pieces, the python wrappers will always install, which is

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-06-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Tim, we just tried the trunk. It's better but there are still multiple problems: - LDFLAGS is not used when you link the executables (it's only used when you link libregfi) - the default value for LDFLAGS is wrong, -z relro is an option for ld but when you pass it through gcc you need

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-06-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, On Sat, 01 Oct 2011, Tim wrote: I released 1.0.1 today. Since 0.99.0, RegLookup has included Python wrappers that are now used by third-party projects, including Registry Decoder and DFF. It would help those projects' packaging efforts a lot if a recent version of RegLookup were in

Bug#790261: memdump: FTBFS: unsupported system: Linux.4.0.0-1-amd64

2015-07-28 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 pending Hi, On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Daniel Schepler wrote: make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/buildd/memdump-1.01' unsupported system: Linux.4.0.0-1-amd64 I have uploaded memdump 1.01-7 fixing this bug and cleaning up the package. I have my changes in my local git repository and

Bug#794045: hashdeep: fails to upgrade from md5deep/experimental

2015-08-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: severity -1 important On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Andreas Beckmann wrote: during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'md5deep' in 'experimental' to hashdeep in sid. While this is a problem, experimental packages are not widely used and I don't think this

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-09-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Tim, sorry for the delay of my answer but August was DebConf and vacation... On Fri, 07 Aug 2015, Tim wrote: > I finally had a chance to take another crack at this. I've attempted > to address all of the items listed above. I integrated your guys' soname So we tried to update the

Bug#791737: Resetting auto-removal timer

2015-09-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, just a short mail sent to those bugs to show that even though the fixes have not yet landed in testing, we do care about the package not getting removed from testing... 14:57 nthykier: will https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/autopsy be removed really? both bugs are fixed but they did not

Bug#644019: reglookup: Please package latest upstream (1.0.1)

2015-09-15 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Tim wrote: > Could you actually just try using subversion? I may be mirroring it > on GitHub, but that doesn't mean I use git. I'm not convinced I even > like git. Far too complex for simple projects. > > Anyway, I'm just pushing a mirror of my SVN repo to GitHub

Bug#826633: Bug#826632: Updating the unhide Uploaders list

2016-06-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: tag -1 + pending On Tue, 07 Jun 2016, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Julien Valroff has retired, so can't work on > the unhide package anymore (at least with this address). > > We are tracking their status in the MIA team and would like to ask you > to remove them from the

Re: DebConf16?

2016-04-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Michael Prokop wrote: > Is anyone else from the Debian Forensics team coming to DebConf16? Me. It might be a good time to think of restarting the discussion about a team with a larger scope... in fact I did the first steps recently by creating a "pkg-security" team:

Bug#841447: Downgrading to normal

2017-01-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Control: severity -1 normal This problem is not reproducible on all systems and the bug reporter did not respond to initial queries in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841447#12 so there's no reason to keep this bug at a release critical severity. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈

Switch to salsa, the good time to merge forensics and pkg-security?

2018-01-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello everybody, in the following weeks I will likely work on switching pkg-security from alioth to salsa. I will request a new mailing list on lists.debian.org. Since this is a relatively disruptive change that is imposed on both teams sooner or later, I believe that it is the right occasion to

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

2018-01-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Phil. wrote: > Can you please add my account : Philou-guest ? Done. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

2018-01-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > Many thanks for your work. > May I ask you to add me : stefek-guest ? Sure but there is no such account on salsa.debian.org. Please create one first. :-) (or maybe validate it I don't know) Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

2018-01-23 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > 2018-01-23 11:44 GMT+01:00 Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org>: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Stéphane Neveu wrote: > >> Many thanks for your work. > >> May I ask you to add me : stefek-guest ? > > > > Sure but

Switch to salsa done, important news

2018-01-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 09 Jan 2018, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > If you agree, I will create the required team on salsa and add members of > both Alioth teams and import all git repositories and configure them to > integrate properly with the Debian package tracker. I have imported all repositories he

Re: Switch to salsa done, important news

2018-01-22 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Samuel Henrique wrote: > I'll need access ​to the team: samueloph-guest Done. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: https://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: https://debian-handbook.info/get/

Bug#894967: mac-robber FTCBFS: uses the build architecture compiler

2018-04-06 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello Helmut, On Thu, 05 Apr 2018, Helmut Grohne wrote: > mac-robber fails to cross build from source, because it uses the build > architecture compiler. The easiest way of fixing that is letting > dh_auto_build do it. After doing so, mac-robber cross builds > successfully. Please consider

Those alioth lists are deprecated

2018-03-02 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, pkg-security-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org and forensics-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org should no longer be used. debian-security-to...@lists.debian.org is the replacement list. See my latest message there for details on things that changed recently and how to get the maintainer emails that