Hi Patrik,
Ah, I was looking in the Fornax documentation instead of the oAW
documentation. That's why I didn't find it. I found the matching link in
the old oAW4 documentation.
http://www.openarchitectureware.org/pub/documentation/4.3.1/html/contents/workflow_reference.html#workflow_reference_
lol!
--Polly
PaloT wrote:
>
> Humor
> As long as you can start Maven from Ant you are safe. :-D
> Humor
>
> Pavel
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-Sculptor--run-using-Ant--tp27950997s17564p27972484.html
Sent f
Hi,
Just out of curiosity, is it possible to run the code generator using Ant?
Is there a way to call the Fornax oaw plugin from Ant?
Thanks,
Polly
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-Sculptor--run-using-Ant--tp27950997s17564p27950997.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mai
great! Thanks!
--Polly
Karsten Thoms wrote:
>
> Yes, a JIRA entry exists: http://fornax.itemis.de/jira/browse/TOM-27
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/-Sculptor--Generator-dependency-tp26309409s17564p26338160.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archiv
cting
> that it takes me 2 whole days to solve it. It is quite tedious to debug
> into this part, and I already spent several hours when I looked into this
> the last time. This is quite huge effort and at the moment I do not have
> time for this.
>
> Kind regards,
> ~Kars
provided
>
>
> That is how the archetypes generate the pom files and that is how I use it
> without any further excludes, and it is not placed in war/ear.
>
> /Patrik
>
>
>
> polly.c.chang wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I&#x
Hi,
I've wondered about this problem for a while now, and I cannot figure out a
way to solve this.
To generate code in my user project, the user project has to declare a
dependency to the "generator" jar, which transitively brings in dependencies
like the "metamodel" and "dsl" jars and EMF, oA
Hi Patrik,
Thanks for your feedback. I am glad to know that it wasn't just us that ran
into this problem. It was quite chaotic and confusing for us for a while.
Probably taking the cache "offline" would have been less drastic than what
we did. I had to upload the few Fornax artifacts that we
Hi,
Can you explain what changes are happening with the Fornax Maven repo? We
are seeing a really weird problem that appears to be contributed by the
Fornax Maven repo.
The setup is that none of our POMs reference the Fornax repo directly.
Instead, our company's Artifactory caches artifacts
Hi Patrick,
Sure! Thanks for pointing out CSC-382. I did not see that. We already
have code that drops all constraints, runs the delete-all, and then
reapplies the constraints, but your solution looks more database agnostic.
We may need to switch to using your solution.
Thanks!
--Polly
Pat
Hi,
The code that generates the DBUnit XML file is really robust and is a great
time-saver! Thank you so much for writing it. However, we noticed that the
generated file is missing the many-to-many join tables. This was pretty
simple to fix though.
In dbhelper.ext:
// get unique list of join
Hi Karsten,
No worries, luckily we were able to get by for the day using our local repo.
Thanks for fixing it!
--Polly
Karsten Thoms wrote:
>
> Hi Polly,
>
> right. I was offline and did not recognized. Disk was full :-/
>
> ~Karsten
>
> Am 17.07.2009 um 16:
ah, ok, so in Sculptor, a collection Reference cannot be used with
"required". It can only be used with "!changeable". Perhaps you can add
validation or documentation to clarify this for others. Just a suggestion.
Thanks for the explanation!
--Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> The reason fo
Hi,
Is the Fornax Maven repo down? This url just hangs:
http://www.fornax-platform.org/archiva/repository/releases
Thanks!
--Polly
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Fornax-maven-repo-down--tp24535930s17564p24535930.html
Sent from the Fornax-Platform mailing list archive
Hi,
I have a question about the "required" keyword. The Advanced Tutorial says:
"As a complement to changeable you can use required for Attributes and
References that are to be included in the constructor, but still have a
setter method."
I find that when we set a Reference collection to requi
Hi Karsten,
Thanks for the quick reply! Yup, I'm using the Fornax plugin to pass the
project-specific properties to the generator project. I'll give you some
more details.
In my user project POM, I normally pass in the properties like this:
Hi,
Does the fornax-oaw-m2-plugin support finding a workflow.oaw file from the
classpath instead of inside the project? The plugin can pass in properties
for everything that I want to configure, so there's no need for me to have a
one-line workflow.oaw file inside my project that just refers to
Hi,
I tried updating fornax-oaw-m2-plugin from version 2.1.1 to 3.0.1. It looks
like logging has changed. I now gets *tons* of debug output that I never
used to see, like:
[org.openarchitectureware.xpand2.output.FileHandleImpl] : Opening file :
C:\projects\runtime\com.foo.model\src\main\java\c
Hi,
I was browsing the Sculptor issues and wondering if there's an easy way to
search/filter for GUI vs. Business Tier issues. For example, I would like
to find all Business Tier issues fixed for the 1.6.0 release. I notice that
most of the time, the GUI issues say "RCP" or "GUI", but the subta
cool! Thanks!
--Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> Do like this in your workflow.oaw
> 1. Define the property for the outlet (same property names as in
> sculptorworkflow.oaw).
> 2. Add inheritAll="true" to the cartridge
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>val
Hi,
I am trying to change the outlet directories in Sculptor using the oAW
plugin. The documentation is here:
http://fornax.itemis.de/confluence/display/fornax/Configuration+(TOM)#Configuration(TOM)-Outlets
I am following the example and setting the directories like this:
}
> }
>
> Additional Outlets cannot be added at the moment. Created a ticket:
> http://fornax.itemis.de/jira/browse/TOM-23
>
> ~Karsten
>
> On 19.05.09 18:18, polly.c.chang wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you for creating the oaw-m2-plugin and updating
Hi,
Thank you for creating the oaw-m2-plugin and updating it to work with both
TMF and OAW! I have a couple of questions about configuring this plugin:
1. On the oaw-m2-plugin wiki page, the documentation says that it should be
possible to "execute the generation phase without the execution o
Hi Patrik,
I am happy to report that I resolved the problem by changing the extension
to something unique. I haven't seen any more error markers related to
loading files from the classpath. I hope that luck stays! I'll go back to
look at the other scenario that you wanted me to test.
Regardin
Oh, will the pain never end with this file resolving problem! I had
everything working great. Design files were getting resolved from the
classpath and there were no errors. I was about to test the condition that
you asked me to check in the other thread. Then I discovered that the evil
red "c
ont.
Of course this is a hack, and when TMF is ready, I'll need to rip this back
out. But I just thought I'd share and let you know that the Sculptor code
is fine. :)
Thanks,
Polly
polly.c.chang wrote:
>
> For some strange reason, I am now able to reproduce the problem in my
duction. With some obstacles and help
> from the development team though.
>
> ~Karsten
>
> On 13.04.2009 20:46 Uhr, polly.c.chang wrote:
>> Hi Patrik,
>>
>> Since the Xtext part of oAW is being rewritten as Eclipse TMF, I was
>> wondering if you have been followi
Hi Patrik,
Since the Xtext part of oAW is being rewritten as Eclipse TMF, I was
wondering if you have been following the TMF milestone builds? Just
curious.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Xtext/Galileo
Thanks,
Polly
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--Eclipse-TMF-tp230
x27;ll let you know
what I find.
Thanks,
Polly
polly.c.chang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have noticed some strange behavior when using oAW 4.3.1 and was
> wondering if you see it in Sculptor also. I have a project that declares
> external imports using the "classpath&q
Hi,
I have noticed some strange behavior when using oAW 4.3.1 and was wondering
if you see it in Sculptor also. I have a project that declares external
imports using the "classpath" method instead of the "platform:/resource"
method. This means that the Design files can be resolved from a jar in
Hi,
I noticed that Design files do not open up if they are in a jar. I get a
NullPointerException in AbstractXtextEditor.
Here's the stacktrace:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.openarchitectureware.xtext.editor.AbstractXtextEditor.doSetInput(AbstractXtextEditor.java:313)
at
org.eclipse.
Hi Patrik,
This is so convenient and resolves the problem! I see the code completion
choices now. :)
Thanks!
--Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> I have tried the oAW correction of
> http://www.openarchitectureware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1675 bug 1675
> .
> I think it works with Sculpt
I Googled around and found this post in the oAW forums. It looks like this
may be the problem that we're seeing.
http://www.openarchitectureware.org/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=29&showtopic=11805
The bug report says that it has been fixed in 4.3.1.x, but it has not been
released.
--Polly
Ma
Hi,
Do you see any problems getting code completion choices to show up when
using oAW 4.3.1? I can only get a few of the choices to show up for some
reason. Does this affect Sculptor also?
Thanks,
Polly
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--code-completion-with-oA
Personally, I like the recursive imports. The second way of doing the
imports is so much cleaner. It would be good if having extra imports
doesn't cause a NullPointerException though. Those can be so hard to
resolve. Just my 2 cents.
I've been swamped so I have been unable to update to oAW 4.
Hi,
I have a user who is having problems with the XMLFormatter. Something seems
to be messed up with his network setup such that when the formatter tries to
resolve the Hibernate DTD during beautification, he gets "connection timed
out" errors. So I want to be able to remove the entry for the t
Hi Patrik,
I have another question for you--
In the hbm file, to get the "key" to not say "on-delete="cascade"", we need
to set this property right?
db.mysql.onDeleteCascade=false
Is this the right thing to do or is that for something else?
Also, do you have a regression test suite that tests
Hi Patrik,
Yes, we found that if we remove the "inverse" from the hbm file, and the
"key" does not say on-delete="cascade", then it works.
Thanks,
Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> Aha, it might be a bug, does it work if you remove the inverse from the
> hbm file?
> /P
>
>
--
View this
Hi Patrik,
Yup, that's what we tried. We ran into a problem though. Here's the
definition:
Entity PropertyData {
- List<@PropertyItem> items fetch="join" cascade="all"
inverse
}
ValueObject PropertyItem {
Hi,
Is it possible to map a uni-directional one-to-many mapping? From looking
at the documentation and template code, it looks like one has to mark the
Reference as "inverse", which is a bi-directional mapping. I just want to
have a simple uni-directional mapping.
Thanks!
--Polly
--
View th
./Andreas
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:04 PM, polly.c.chang
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for checking. That's what I wanted to know--if it works for you
>> using
>> trunk.
>>
>> What do you guys mean that the code is only in SVN but not in the
&
Argh! I finally figured it out. I went back and rediffed all the
Sculptor changes for that fix. I diffed the ecore file changes in the
Sculptor SVN and compared them with my ecore file. Then I realized that
when I changed the metamodel diagram, I used an Aggregation line instead of
an Asso
Thanks for checking. That's what I wanted to know--if it works for you using
trunk.
What do you guys mean that the code is only in SVN but not in the snapshot
version?
Thanks!
--Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> Yes, that might be true.
> /Patrik
>
> PaloT wrote:
>>
>> Isn't it only in S
Hi,
The JIRA below is mentioned as Fixed, but I am having some problems after
copying the fix into my version of Sculptor. I made the change in the
metamodel to add the "serviceDependencies" collection to Service. Then I
copied in the other code changes.
I have this in the design file:
Hi,
I see that someone beat me to creating a JIRA for Fornax to support oAW
4.3.1. ;)
http://www.fornax-platform.org/tracker/browse/TOM-20
Any idea on when Fornax will be compatible with 4.3.1? If you are busy,
that's fine. Can you please tell me where I can find the Maven jars? Then
at lea
Hi,
I tried to reproduce the problem in the trunk version of Sculptor with Jan
from oAW, but I could not reproduce it. The NestedTransformationTest passes
but this always prints out this in the console:
4328 ERROR WorkflowRunner - Workflow interrupted. Reason: Errors during
validation.
4344
Hi Karsten,
I wasn't sure if what I observed was a bug or if there was something that I
needed to do differently. Thanks for creating the issue in the bug tracker!
--Polly
Karsten Thoms wrote:
>
> Yes, this was indeed unplanned. There were some major issues fixed from
> RC2->RC3 and we had
Re-tested with RC3. Same error.
--Polly
polly.c.chang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I haven't heard back in a while and I know that oAW's deadline for
> 3.4.1 Final is coming up, I figured I'd try to help out by posting on the
> oAW forum:
>
> ht
lanned RC3 that came out
yesterday!! Darn it. I guess I'll try this again.
Thanks,
Polly
polly.c.chang wrote:
>
> Ah, that makes sense.
>
> I tested oAW 4.3.1 RC2 with my user projects and ran into issues with the
> nested imports. Then I realized that I should go bac
Well then, that answers my first question. :) Do you think that this is a
complex feature? It looks like it ought to be fairly straight-forward
because there may be some reference code for DslServiceOperation and
DslRepositoryOperation. They both allow the use of DslMapCollectionType.
Please
Hi Patrik,
I was just curious--is somebody working on this feature? If not, when do
you think it might be done and how much work do you think it is to
implement?
I'm just trying to think ahead. As more people are starting to use what
I've built on top of Sculptor, I'm sure that they are goin
Ah, that makes sense.
I tested oAW 4.3.1 RC2 with my user projects and ran into issues with the
nested imports. Then I realized that I should go back to run the Sculptor
JUnit tests manually.
I ran the tests in the "generator" project and found that all tests pass
except for the NestedTransfo
Hi Patrik,
I tested with oAW 4.3.1 RC2. Here are my findings:
1. I made the changes that you mentioned in Extensions.ext and
DslTransformation.ext.
2. The bug that you created below has been closed, and I was able to run
generate.oaw with no problems.
3. After that, there were no error
Hi Patrik,
I tried some similar code earlier when I was trying to write a more generic
function, but I always get an oAW validation error at "metaType". The error
is:
"no viable alternative at input 'metaType'"
I'm not sure what this means. I will post on the oAW forum. We might not
hear bac
Hi,
A while back, we discussed the problem with oAW resolving objects with the
same name in different modules:
http://www.nabble.com/-Sculptor--resolving-references-to-domain-objects-with-same-name-in-different-modules-td19152982s17564.html
Since I know about this issue, I simply don't name obje
Hi Patrik and Karsten,
Thanks for working on this so quickly!
Patrik: the bug that you opened has been marked as Resolved today, so I
will test with RC2 when it comes out today.
Thanks,
Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> It is something strange. I filed a new issue:
> https://bugs.eclipse.
Hi,
oAW has posted their Release Schedule for 4.3.1. This version has an
important bug fix that I really need. So I am wondering--what are
Fornax/Sculptor's plans to support this version?
I tried out 4.3.1 RC1 today, but I keep seeing these errors in Eclipse:
Couldn't find operation 'load()'
Hi Patrick,
Thank you very much for this trick. I finally had another chance to work on
this today. I learned another trick on the oAW forums that I finally went
with. It turns out that you can do this in the ContentAssist.ext file:
// don't want the user to use Consumer and databaseType keyw
interesting! I'll give that a try and let you know what I find. Thanks!
--Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> I think it is defined in the generated class SculptordslUtilities, method
> allKeywords
>
> It is possible to change to your own variant (subclass) of
> SculptordslUtilities by changin
Hi,
What I want to do is when the user is on an attribute and tries to do code
completion, I don't want "databaseType" to show up. I am just not having
any luck. This looks like it should work but doesn't:
/* proposals for Feature DslAttribute::databaseType */
List[Proposal] completeDslAttribu
Ah, thank you for the explanation. Now that I know that, some of the weird
behavior that I saw make a lot more sense now.
Thanks,
Polly
Patrik Nordwall wrote:
>
> It is easy to think that these would behave like object oriented
> overridden methods, but they don't.
> When getAllElements() in
Hi Patrik,
Neat!! I had no idea that those two methods in Extension.ext would fix the
problem. Aren't they the same as the ones in GenExtension.ext? Why does
duplicating them in Extension.ext fix the problem?
So yes, the nested imports and references do resolve correctly now.
Thank you so
Hi Patrik,
I finally had a chance to test your changes. It looks good for the
implementation of the "use" keyword and propagation of the "external"
attribute to nested design files. However, it seems that it is not possible
to reference an object defined inside a nested file. Given:
model1
Hi Patrik,
The first usage that you described makes sense. We are using the second
usage that you identified. The "common" project is a library that simply
defines numerous Domain Objects and Enums. There are no Managers or
Services, and the Domain Objects are shared across many applications f
Hi Patrik,
Neat!! That is so awesome. I will test this out after I solve another
problem that I ran into. It turns out that importing design files from
another project does not run in an automated test environment. :(
http://www.openarchitectureware.org/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=10623
I
65 matches
Mail list logo
