Re: [Patch, fortran] PRs 46691 and 99819: Assumed and explicit size class arrays

Hi Paul, this and the Changelog LGTM at least for 12. Give it a consolidation time before applying to 11. Having had some issues in the vicinity of the code you addressed I am quite happy to see how easy the fix looks. Any chances you can take a look at

Re: [Patch, fortran] PRs 46691 and 99819: Assumed and explicit size class arrays

Hi All, Please find below a corrected ChangeLog. Sorry that I didn't get it right first go. Paul Fortran: Assumed and explicit size class arrays [PR46691/99819]. 2021-05-06 Paul Thomas gcc/fortran/ChangeLog PR fortran/46691 PR fortran/99819 * class.c (gfc_build_class_symbol): Remove the

[Patch, fortran] PRs 46691 and 99819: Assumed and explicit size class arrays

Hi All, Although I had undertaken to concentrate on PDTs, PR99819 so intrigued me that I became locked into it :-( After extensive, fruitless rummaging through decl.c and trans-decl.c, I realised that the problem was far simpler than it seemed and that it lay in class.c. After that PR was fixed,