[Patch, fortran] PR112316 - [13 Regression] Fix for PR87477 rejects valid code with a bogus error...

Hi All, I have pushed as 'obvious' a fix for this regression to both 13-branch and mainline. The patch itself looks substantial but it consists entirely of the removal of a condition and repagination of the corresponding block. Please see below for part of my first comment on the PR for an explana

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR98498 - Interp request: defined operators and unlimited polymorphic

Hi Paul, Am 02.11.23 um 19:18 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas: Hi Harald, I was overthinking the problem. The rejected cases led me to a fix that can only be described as a considerable simplification compared with the first patch! this patch is *much* simpler, makes more sense, and works here. :

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR98498 - Interp request: defined operators and unlimited polymorphic

Hi Harald, I was overthinking the problem. The rejected cases led me to a fix that can only be described as a considerable simplification compared with the first patch! The testcase now reflects the requirements of the standard and regtests without failures. OK for mainline? Thanks Paul Fortr

Re: [PATCH v4] libgfortran: Replace mutex with rwlock

[CCing Ian as libgcc maintainer] On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 10:14:37 + "Zhu, Lipeng" wrote: > > > > > > Hi Lipeng, > > > > > > >>> Sure, as your comments, in the patch V6, I added 3 test cases with > > > >>> OpenMP to test different cases in concurrency respectively: > > > >>> 1. find and create u