Re: [PATCH] Fortran: improve attribute conflict checking [PR93635]

Hi Mikael, Am 09.05.24 um 21:51 schrieb Mikael Morin: Hello, Le 06/05/2024 à 21:33, Harald Anlauf a écrit : Dear all, I've been contemplating whether to submit the attached patch. It addresses an ICE-on-invalid as reported in the PR, and also fixes an accepts-invalid (see testcase), plus mayb

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: improve attribute conflict checking [PR93635]

Hello, Le 06/05/2024 à 21:33, Harald Anlauf a écrit : Dear all, I've been contemplating whether to submit the attached patch. It addresses an ICE-on-invalid as reported in the PR, and also fixes an accepts-invalid (see testcase), plus maybe some more, related due to incomplete checking of symbo

Re: [PATCH 2/4] fortran: Teach get_real_kind_from_node for Power 128 fp modes [PR112993]g

On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 01:37:32PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote: > > > > > That said, Fortran has the concept of model numbers, which > > are set in arith.c. Does this change give the expected > > value for ibm128? For example, with "REAL(16) X", one > > has "DIGITS(X) = 113", which is the precision

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR84006 [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

Hi Paul, Am 09.05.24 um 09:52 schrieb Paul Richard Thomas: Hi Harald, Inserting your print statements, my test shows the difference in size(chr_a) but prints chr_a as "abcdefgjj" no matter what I do. have you tried ./a.out | cat -ev ? Or some terminal that shows control characters? Cheers

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR84006 [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity

Hi Harald, The Linaro people caught that as well. Thanks. Interestingly, I was about to re-submit the patch for PR113363, in which all the invalid accesses and memory leaks are fixed but requires this patch to do so. The final transfer was thrown in because it seemed to be working out of the box