On 5/23/2015 11:08 AM, Joe Prostko wrote:
> Perhaps Andy Goth or others would like to chime in, but I say keep the
> 1.33 tarball as it is (fossil-src-1.33.tar.gz extracting to
> fossil-src-1.33) unless you are willing to get rid of the "-src" and
> create a new tarball following the same conventio
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 5/23/15, Joe Prostko wrote:
> > One thing I noticed is that the source directory name upon
> > extracting the tar.gz is different in this release compared to 1.32.
> 1.32
> > extracted to fossil-1.32, and 1.33 extracts to fossil-src-1.33
On 5/23/15, Joe Prostko wrote:
> One thing I noticed is that the source directory name upon
> extracting the tar.gz is different in this release compared to 1.32. 1.32
> extracted to fossil-1.32, and 1.33 extracts to fossil-src-1.33.
Ugh. I was just following the build recipe in the Wiki
(https
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Fossil version 1.33 has been tagged. Binaries are available on the
> download page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
Richard,
Very nice! One thing I noticed is that the source directory name upon
extracting the tar.gz is differe
Fossil version 1.33 has been tagged. Binaries are available on the
download page: https://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html
--
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org
