On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Old style: http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=b8c7af5b
> New style: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=b8c7af5b
i actually like the www2 one better, as it clearly shows that two branches
(green/teal) are still opened bu
On 3/18/16, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
>> Old style: http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=b8c7af5b
>> New style: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?b=b8c7af5b
>
>
> i actually like the www2 one better, as it clearly shows that two
Thus said Stephan Beal on Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:53:38 +0100:
> i actually like the www2 one better, as it clearly shows that two
> branches (green/teal) are still opened but have not been edited
> "recently".
I think I still prefer the old style as well, but I'm not sure if that
is ju
On 3/18/2016 7:46 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
Separately, I have "improved" the graph generator (on a branch) so
that when you have nodes (such as the above) where the node is near
the bottom of the graph but its next child is off the top of the
graph, then the upwards arrow goes up just a little way
On 3/11/16, Ross Berteig wrote:
>
> https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=50&y=ci&b=2016-02-20+20:53:40
>
> and notice that the graph does not show a line extending north from that
> checkin off the top of the screen as it usually does for other non-leaf
> checkins,
This should be fixe
Ross Berteig wrote:
>
> Compare to the one page older view of the full timeline, where the first
> checkin of the tag can be found near 2016-02-02:
>
>
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?n=50&y=ci&b=2016-02-20+20:53:
40
>
> and notice that the graph does not show a line extending no
