Re: [fossil-dev] Fossil 2.0 Beta

2017-03-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 01 Mar 2017 17:35:56 -0500: > All other SHA1 hashes remain the same. If you doubt that assertion, > you can test it by running "fossil test-integrity" or "fossil all > test-integrity". On a side note, it appears that test-integrity is slightly slower than

Re: [fossil-dev] Fossil 2.0 Beta

2017-03-01 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 1, 2017, at 4:29 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 3/1/17, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Is the server under really heavy load at the moment? I’ve got a clone from >> http://www.fossil-scm.org that’s been running for several minutes now. >> Updates

Re: [fossil-dev] Fossil 2.0 Beta

2017-03-01 Thread Richard Hipp
On 3/1/17, Warren Young wrote: > > Is the server under really heavy load at the moment? I’ve got a clone from > http://www.fossil-scm.org that’s been running for several minutes now. > Updates normally take just a few seconds here. Load average is less than 10%. Works fine

Re: [fossil-dev] Fossil 2.0 Beta

2017-03-01 Thread Warren Young
On Mar 1, 2017, at 3:35 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The trunk check-in of Fossil > (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=trunk) is the release > candidate for version 2.0. I plan to do the version 2.0 release with > 48 hours. Please test it out, as you are able. Is