Re: [fossil-dev] Git Tag comments, again [Was: Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0]

[Richard Hipp]

On 3/31/17, Jan Nijtmans  wrote:
> 2017-03-31 17:04 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp:
>> I don't understand the details of this issue, but my instinct would be
>> to use the T card to avoid an incompatibility.
>
> Thanks! Does that mean that the "jn-export" branch can be merged
> to trunk? Then GIT tag comments will sync with fossil, both ways.
>

I think that will be ok.
-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Re: [fossil-dev] Git Tag comments, again [Was: Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0]

[Jan Nijtmans]

2017-03-31 17:04 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp:
> I don't understand the details of this issue, but my instinct would be
> to use the T card to avoid an incompatibility.

Thanks! Does that mean that the "jn-export" branch can be merged
to trunk? Then GIT tag comments will sync with fossil, both ways.

Regards,
  Jan Nijtmans

>
> On 3/31/17, Jan Nijtmans  wrote:
>> 2017-03-30 21:24 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp:
>>> On 3/30/17, Jan Nijtmans  wrote:
 Ping .Could this be decided for Fossil 2.2? Please?
>>>
>>> libfossil is a non-trivial undertaking.  Because of the way Fossil is
>>> currently architected, libfossil is basically a ground-up rewrite.
>>
>> Hm. My question had no relation to libfossil, it was related to this
>> requested feature:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Allowing Git tag comments is already implemented by Roy Marples, and I
>> modified it a little bit. The question is: Should a 'C' card be used for the
>> tag comments (which causes a format incompatibility), or should we use
>> the - already existing - 'T' card.
>>
>> It's just a matter of deciding which would be best, Roy and I differ in
>> opinion. So, Richard, if you indicate which version "roy-export" or
>> "jn-export" you prefer, then that's one less hurdle for GIT people
>> to switch to fossil ;-) Would be nice for fossil 2.2 anyway.
>>
>> Details can be found in the above link to the fossil-users mailing list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   Jan Nijtmans
>> ___
>> fossil-dev mailing list
>> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
>> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
>>
>
>
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> ___
> fossil-dev mailing list
> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev

Re: [fossil-dev] Git Tag comments, again [Was: Proposed roadmap for Fossil 2.0]

[Richard Hipp]

I don't understand the details of this issue, but my instinct would be
to use the T card to avoid an incompatibility.

On 3/31/17, Jan Nijtmans  wrote:
> 2017-03-30 21:24 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp:
>> On 3/30/17, Jan Nijtmans  wrote:
>>> Ping .Could this be decided for Fossil 2.2? Please?
>>
>> libfossil is a non-trivial undertaking.  Because of the way Fossil is
>> currently architected, libfossil is basically a ground-up rewrite.
>
> Hm. My question had no relation to libfossil, it was related to this
> requested feature:
>
> 
>
> Allowing Git tag comments is already implemented by Roy Marples, and I
> modified it a little bit. The question is: Should a 'C' card be used for the
> tag comments (which causes a format incompatibility), or should we use
> the - already existing - 'T' card.
>
> It's just a matter of deciding which would be best, Roy and I differ in
> opinion. So, Richard, if you indicate which version "roy-export" or
> "jn-export" you prefer, then that's one less hurdle for GIT people
> to switch to fossil ;-) Would be nice for fossil 2.2 anyway.
>
> Details can be found in the above link to the fossil-users mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
>   Jan Nijtmans
> ___
> fossil-dev mailing list
> fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev
>


-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-dev mailing list
fossil-dev@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-dev