[fossil-users] Converted a project and seeking advice

2010-09-09 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Last night I decided to convert one of my larger, unreleased projects to Fossil, and to try a soft launch to see how I like it. Only, my conversion process was somewhat convoluted, and I have this fear that while it looks OK in the web

Re: [fossil-users] Converted a project and seeking advice

2010-09-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.infowrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello. Last night I decided to convert one of my larger, unreleased projects to Fossil, and to try a soft launch to see how I like it. Only, my conversion process was

Re: [fossil-users] Converted a project and seeking advice

2010-09-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Nolan Darilek no...@thewordnerd.infowrote: Any thoughts on why I can't check out the first, empty commit? I just tried on another test repository and it works fine, but in http://dev.thewordnerd.info/hermes I'm told that it isn't a commit. It seems that the

Re: [fossil-users] Converted a project and seeking advice

2010-09-09 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/09/2010 07:43 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: It seems that the is_a_version() function used to determine if the thing you are trying to checkout really is a checkin, works by looking to see if the object has ancestors or children. (It used to only

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

2010-09-09 Thread Richard Hipp
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:48 AM, James Peverill arsenix.accou...@gmail.comwrote: On 09/09/2010 09:26 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org wrote: Fossil never generates a 401 error. The 401 Authorization Required message is coming from someplace else. Are you sure your webserver is

Re: [fossil-users] Converted a project and seeking advice

2010-09-09 Thread Nolan Darilek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wow, thanks for the quick feature! At first glance it seems to work. I'll make some commits later today or this week and report back if anything should break. On 09/09/2010 08:59 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Nolan Darilek

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

2010-09-09 Thread Joshua Paine
On 09/09/2010 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: I see. Right - fossil sync does not have any idea how to do LDAP authentication. AFAICT, mod_ldap lets Apache use an LDAP directory for authentication information instead of a .htpasswd file. So if I'm reading right, fossil sync wouldn't need to

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

2010-09-09 Thread Paul Ruizendaal
I see. Right - fossil sync does not have any idea how to do LDAP authentication. I guess LDAP credentials are stored in the browser somehow. But fossil sync bypasses the browser completely. So I guess it will somehow need to understand some kind of LDAP authentication protocol and

[fossil-users] Recursive deletes ?

2010-09-09 Thread jim Schimpf
Hi, I'm trying to tidy up a build directory after I mistakenly added a bunch of temp build files. So I did: 699 terms-win fossil rm build DELETED build/Debug/terms-win DELETED build/terms-win.build/Debug/terms-win.build/build-state.dat DELETED

Re: [fossil-users] user/pass login with https?

2010-09-09 Thread Michael Schlenker
Am 09.09.2010 um 16:03 schrieb Richard Hipp: On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:48 AM, James Peverill arsenix.accou...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/09/2010 09:26 AM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org wrote: Fossil never generates a 401 error. The 401 Authorization Required message is coming

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 32, Issue 15

2010-09-09 Thread James Peverill
On 09/09/2010 03:54 PM, fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org wrote: 1. Trust a front end webserver like apache and what it sets in the REMOTE_USER cgi variable (you could use Kerberos/SPNEGO Auth that way too, same principle if you used mod_kerb). This is what we have been doing