On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Graeme Pietersz gra...@pietersz.net
wrote:
All the files concerned have a distinctive filename pattern (all start
the same) and would only ever have been in one of two directories in any
version. Not sure if that helps.
Fossil does not shun by filename, but
Nice.
Is it possible to trim the results to only a specific file using a raw SQL
query or TH1?
Or is it quicker to just parse fossil test-whatis-all artifacts.txt
output?
Can I enter multiple artifacts(comma or space delimited) in the shun ui or
only 1 at a time?
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 16:37:41 +0530, Graeme Pietersz
gra...@pietersz.net wrote:
I have a Fossil repo that I expected to only work on myself. I have
files containing confidential information and I now need to allow
someone else developer access (so clone, push and pull as a minimum) to
the
On 17/08/15 16:47, Stephan Beal wrote:
Fossil does not shun by filename, but my hash value, so you'll need to
find all hashes of all versions of those files and shun those.
I counted 71 versions of the most frequently changed of those files
a lot easier to recreate.
It is likely far
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 18:04:37 +0200, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
I read the search feature is in a trial stage.
Can it be expanded to search in actual source files?
Now using the browser and only per file. Or of course in an external tool
in my checkout folder.
Thanks for Fossil.
until the
I read the search feature is in a trial stage.
Can it be expanded to search in actual source files?
Now using the browser and only per file. Or of course in an external tool
in my checkout folder.
Thanks for Fossil.
___
fossil-users mailing list
Hello,
Thank you for the quick response. Sorry it took me so long to respond.
On 16/08/15 23:37, Jan Danielsson wrote:
I assume you aren't using client certificates; but I'll ask anyway:
Are you using client-certificates to achieve mutual authentication, or
is it a server-only
[ conversation about appearance of permuted index page from a while ago ]
On 22 June 2015 at 20:11, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote:
On 6/22/2015 10:46 AM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree we all think differently, but the output should collate the
descriptions while keeping only a
8 matches
Mail list logo
