Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-20 Thread Marcel Graf
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > There seems to be a timeline issue: > > https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/timeline?n=50=all=1 > > The [2c6bdf20ea] merge check-in has two entries for each of the modified > files. > The are also

[fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync

2015-10-20 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
Dear list, I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine. In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks proxy. I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about it. It is possible to clone and sync via socks proxies? I'll be happy to read

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-20 Thread Martin Gagnon
> Le 20 oct. 2015 à 03:45, Jan Nijtmans a écrit : > > 2015-10-20 9:16 GMT+02:00 Marcel Graf : >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Joe Mistachkin >> wrote: >>> There seems to be a timeline issue: >>> >>>

Re: [fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync

2015-10-20 Thread Richard Hipp
On 10/20/15, Paolo Bolzoni wrote: > Dear list, > > I'd like to use fossil in a strangely configurated headless machine. > In that machine to connected to the internet I need to use a socks > proxy. > > I checked the fossil manual, but I could not find anything about

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-20 Thread Jan Nijtmans
2015-10-20 9:16 GMT+02:00 Marcel Graf : > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Joe Mistachkin > wrote: >> There seems to be a timeline issue: >> >> https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/timeline?n=50=all=1 >> >> The [2c6bdf20ea] merge

Re: [fossil-users] Time to release Fossil version 1.34?

2015-10-20 Thread Joe Mistachkin
Jan Nijtmans wrote: > > It turns out that the cause of this problem is the following commit: > > so I backed it out. My local trunk build doesn't show the problem > any more. > Actually, it appears you backed out two check-ins.

Re: [fossil-users] socks proxy fossil sync

2015-10-20 Thread Paolo Bolzoni
I actually found that page, but it speaks only of http proxies. Not socks proxies. At the moment I solved using tsocks[1]. [1] http://tsocks.sourceforge.net On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 10/20/15, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-20 Thread The Tick
On 10/19/2015 9:36 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: On 10/19/15, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: My question is how can I add this image to the repo in a way that it is not part of any branch or ticket (e.g., attachment to a ticket)? I only need it for the purpose of being shown in the wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Questions about wiki linking to non-branch artifact IDs/images

2015-10-20 Thread Stephan Beal
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 2:25 AM, The Tick wrote: > This is similar to what I want to do so I gave it a try--I added an image > to a wiki page as an attachment. It's not what I want. It adds text to the > bottom of the page that says "Attachments". > > How can I remove the