Re: [fossil-users] File contains invalid UTF-8, but is not UTF-8.

2014-07-22 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: No characters between 128 and 255 are valid UTF-8, to avoid confusion with the many encodings which use that range. For the record, that's

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-19 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:40 AM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-19 5:12 GMT+02:00 Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com: How about, defining a new branch closed tag and add: (Yes, I know are more details, but this is the general idea) Sorry, but I don't think this is a good

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: It seems it is not possible to commit to a new branch from a closed branch. this is version 1.28. I think this should be allowed. Closing a

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Eric Rubin-Smith eas@gmail.com wrote: Matt Welland wrote: In that case I'd suggest a new mechanism - locked with the behavior I described. I dunno. In my mind one of fossil's big advantages is that stays out of your way because it has a limited number

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: To get the feature Matt suggested, I suggested adding a new Fossil defined tag and adding the the following after the code cited above (inserting

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a list of what's changed since the last release

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: When I am assembling a new software release, I assemble a ChangeLog from the checkin comments since the last release. Prior to moving to Fossil, I used svn log -r12345:HEAD for this. That lists the checkin comments from

Re: [fossil-users] What is a baseline?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Baseline appears in the help for ci (as --baseline) If I understand the description in the help, --baseline forces the created manifest to be a baseline manifest.. This seems reasonable. Perhaps the description can

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync failed, database is locked

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Actually, I think I just figured it out: $ fossil server /museum # where I keep my *.fossils $ fossil open /museum/repo.fossil $ fossil sync http://me@server/repo ...hack, hack, hack...

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a list of what's changed since the last release

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 7/18/2014 13:05, Ron W wrote: fossil timeline after | perl -n -e print if /tags: .*branchname/; That only works if your commit messages are so short they don't cause a line wrap. I use an 80 column terminal

Re: [fossil-users] Autosync failed, database is locked

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: It may be that SQLite has changed the way it does locking since you tried this. Different OSes also affect the way SQLite does locking. Most of us are running fossil server even though we no longer do peer-to-peer sync.

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-18 20:53 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: /* ** If not creating a new branch, do not allow a commit against a closed branch

Re: [fossil-users] committing to a *new* branch from a closed branch not currently possible?

2014-07-18 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-19 1:02 GMT+02:00 Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com: Also, I had suggested separate tests for closed leaf and closed branch. Fossil doesn't have the concept of a 'closed branch', it's only the final leaf that can

Re: [fossil-users] collaboration with Fossil (was Re: purge/shun single branch(es))

2014-07-17 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com writes: Reading more about bundles, they appear, in Fossil terms, to be what would be sent out by a push, or similar to an incremental export (yes, Fossil supports incremental exports). Hmm, can

Re: [fossil-users] collaboration with Fossil (was Re: purge/shun single branch(es))

2014-07-17 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: The fossil export command has the options --export-marks and --import-marks for storing and reading RIDs of exported data in a named file. The first

Re: [fossil-users] libfossil: new script binding

2014-07-17 Thread Ron W
Very interesting project. Somehow, I missed that th1ish wasn't a modified TH1 engine. While I appreciate a C-like syntax, I am a bit surprised to see the switch away from TCL-like syntax. Will be interesting to see how this project compares to other ;scripting engines designed for embedding,

Re: [fossil-users] collaboration with Fossil (was Re: purge/shun single branch(es))

2014-07-16 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com writes: As best I can determine from a description of hg bundle, a patch file provides similar functionality. I believe it's more...darcs has it, same with bzr hg...it is the ability to create

Re: [fossil-users] purge/shun single branch(es)

2014-07-15 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Afaik, there was some talk inthe past about having some kind of hg-like bundle which could be sent via email applied... At least from the web UI, Fossil can create patch files from commits. As best I can determine from a

Re: [fossil-users] purge/shun single branch(es)

2014-07-15 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Very briefly from the phone: about 6 months ago i looked into the simplest such action i could think of - erasing the top-most checkin (from there one could keep erasing one step back at a time). It turns out that

Re: [fossil-users] SourceForge hosting

2014-07-15 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:06 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Fossil's wikipedia page lists SourceForge as an option for source code hosting with the following URL: http://fossilrepos.sourceforge.net/ As best I can tell, the page allows you to create a Fossil repository that lives on a

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-11 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net wrote: At Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:31:11 -0700, B Harder wrote: It's certainly not cut and dried :) This has been a fairly thought provoking discussion, as in the process of arguing for symlinks, I'm now questioning why I like

Re: [fossil-users] [fossil extras] versus symlinks

2014-07-11 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: Someone suggested that the build process should create the links. We don't disagree, but we (my team and I) are nowhere near agreeing on how

[fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Ron W
In the web UI, is there a way to fetch the artifact by the file name? Something like: /artifact?name=filenameci=tag I think something like this has been answered on the list, but I wasn't successful searching for it. ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] artifact by file name

2014-07-09 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Brian Tiffin bwtif...@gmail.com wrote: Now try /artifact?ci=CHECKINfilename=PATH That worked. Thanks. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6