Re: [fossil-users] Fossil Version 2.1 (prerelease)

On Mar 5, 2017, at 9:15 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 3/5/17, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: >> fossil init --sha1 repo.fossil > > why would you want to do that? One may have a public-facing repo and want it to be readable by the fossil binaries packaged

Re: [fossil-users] How to deal with obsolete stuff in a repository

On Apr 17, 2017, at 8:26 PM, The Tick wrote: > > On 4/17/2017 9:11 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: >> Try to avoid >> preserving a version number as part of the folder names in the workspace >> even if your upstream does that to you. > > So I've goofed up by putting freetype-2.7.1/

Re: [fossil-users] Incomplete patch with idea for enhancement

On Apr 18, 2017, at 8:07 PM, The Tick wrote: > > I added this patch: > > --- doc.c.orig 2017-03-10 11:07:08.0 -0600 > +++ doc.c 2017-04-17 23:32:03.770418400 -0500 > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ > { "\211PNG\r\n\032\n", 8, "image/png" }, > { "\377\332\377",

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 11:58 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > With git and hg, your repository and > checkout are more closely bound and are strictly one-to-one. Not “strictly.” Git has the git-worktree command as of 2.5 which links the current checkout to a new working directory:

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 11:41 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > > Today I tried to check something in to the master repository, but even after > going to one of the others and running fossil sync, the change doesn’t show > up there…am I forgetting something? What does “fossil set

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > if each script file has its own independent version, its not part of a > greater whole per say…its just the version of that exact file..nothing > more……appearing in the source comment. My ship script doesn’t care about

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:55 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > no matter what I have tried to add enumeration lists in my fossil tickets, > the ticket comment is still coming up without any formatting. There are two ways I can see that happening: 1. You didn’t select Wiki from the

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > yea that’s way overkill. The attached script creates versioned zip files given a Fossil-versioned file name containing the file and a manifest file called VERSION. You can therefore get the version number in the file name

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > I will try to find a solution outside of fossil. The ship script gets you 95% of the way there. For example, if you absolutely positively had to have the version number embedded into the deployed JS file, you could

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:23 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > I have tried with a blank line between the paragraph and the list also, same > result. yes I am making sure always that the wiki menu item is selected Here’s a freshly-created Fossil repository with one ticket, formatted as

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 2:53 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > well…its not for a website…javascript is used for a lot of stuff out there > besides the web. Its not practical for the name of the file to have a > version encoded into it. Easily solved. During the “generate deployment

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:12 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > yes the wiki menu item is selected > > yes no blank lines are present, still getting unformatted results. for > example > > This is some paragraph > # item one > # item two > > this results in: > > This is some

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 12:09 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > I’m hoping to have a version that is stamped into the comments of the actual > file as well. For example I have some javascripts that are used in another > entirely closed environment that doesn’t have access to fossil, so

Re: [fossil-users] Two easy questions

On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > its way overkill to have to follow any kind of build or deployment process > whatsoever for these scripts. One other thing: you had to have some kind of step to deploy these. If it’s just a “cp” command, build that into

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:46 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > i’m getting the same result with new tickets, or adding on to tickets, makes > no difference. Send back the changed repository so that I (or someone else) can examine it. ___

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > Here’s a freshly-created Fossil repository with one ticket, formatted as you > ask: > >https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6JrNPgaCV7RYldEc0d6MnpXTGc I apologize to those who have tried the link

Re: [fossil-users] wiki in ticket comments??

On Aug 15, 2017, at 5:46 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > > well figured it out.. for some reason my main repository had the following > is it possible to have a diagram on my wiki page without that HTML option > checked? Fossil Wiki syntax accepts HTML tags. See:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil performance and optimisation

On Aug 11, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Damien Sykes-Lindley wrote: > > I couldn't help noticing there seemed to be a silence on speed comparisons. There have been many threads on this over the years. Just for a start, search the list archives for “NetBSD”. > After

Re: [fossil-users] Action-based automation and scripting

On Aug 11, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Damien Sykes-Lindley wrote: > > Is it possible for Fossil to run scripts when performing operations like > creating new repositories, importing, exporting, committing etc? There are several ways: 1. Tcl/TH1 script feature:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil performance and optimisation

On Aug 11, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Damien Sykes-Lindley wrote: > > so that sounds can easily be edited and changed without loss of quality they > are uncompressed PCM data. I suppose I could convert them to FLAC I must not have been clear: when you cannot use a

Re: [fossil-users] diff for browse.c

On Jul 11, 2017, at 1:52 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Related trivia: native German speakers, regardless of whether they're > functionally fluent in English, can often be identified in internet forums > via their overuse of commas Another telltale is the implicit subject

Re: [fossil-users] fossil info on tag & directory: SQLITE_CANTOPEN

On Jul 11, 2017, at 12:32 AM, jungle boogie wrote: > > % fossil info stuff > > But that results in this error: > SQLITE_CANTOPEN: cannot open file at line 36100 of [284707a7b3] > SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_unix.c:36100: (21) > open(/usr/home/jungle/fossil-repos/repo/stuff) -

Re: [fossil-users] diff for browse.c

On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:56 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 7/10/17, jungle Boogie wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> One very minor update to browse.c to add a comma: > > I don't think that comma is correct. The most important comma rule I > was taught in 8th

Re: [fossil-users] warning about unsaved changes with `fossil checkout --keep`

On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:30 PM, Natacha Porté wrote: > > on Thursday 06 July 2017 at 14:01, Richard Hipp wrote: >> >> (1) Make edits on Linux but do not commit. >> (2) Copy the files to Windows and verify that they work there too. >> (3) Run "fossil commit" on Linux. >> ...

Re: [fossil-users] diff for browse.c

On Jul 11, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > >https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/actual (noun sense 1) 2! ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion: WIKI command EXPORT clean of tags

On Jun 28, 2017, at 7:57 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > However, these formatting tags are displayed cluttering the display (for some > heavily formatted pages to the point of being unreadable). Why not use Markdown formatting then? The same source file that produces pretty

Re: [fossil-users] advice on managing language specific branches

On Jun 28, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > Now I have to maintain the same application on two different language > versions, php 5 and 7. I created a LANG_5 and LANG_7 branch and work > as usual. > But what about common branches? Let's say I develop a common

Re: [fossil-users] warning about unsaved changes with `fossil checkout --keep`

On Jul 6, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Natacha Porté wrote: > > I was recently in a very uncomfortable situation, with precious > uncommitted data in the current checkout and the need to change where > the checkout "current commit" points to. Usually when I find myself in that

Re: [fossil-users] Getting a database locked error in fossil sync

On Aug 4, 2017, at 6:37 PM, abhijit nandy wrote: > > However, when I try to run the fossil sync command, I get the following error > Sync with Are you using “fossil server”, and is that the path to the file being served? I’ve seen such errors when both “fossil server” and

Re: [fossil-users] Minor markdown glitches

On Jul 28, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 7/28/17, Florian Balmer wrote: >> >> -- >> * The first list: ... >> >> * The second list: `|` `<` ... >> -- >> >> causes a crash > > Thanks for the bug report. Now fixed on

Re: [fossil-users] Minor markdown glitches

On Jul 28, 2017, at 2:07 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > I didn’t report it because I was able to work around it I just remembered that there was another case I worked around when writing that document: 1. **`n8.c`** **`n8.s`** That should format as

Re: [fossil-users] Is there a way to see history (e.g., annotate) for a single line of code?

On Aug 1, 2017, at 6:44 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 8/1/17, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: >> When doing ‘annotate’ on a certain file version I see the most recent commit >> responsible for each line in the file. That’s great! >> >> However, if I want to know

Re: [fossil-users] Is there a way to see history (e.g., annotate) for a single line of code?

On Aug 1, 2017, at 12:45 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > ...somewhat prone to reporting false differences. And once it’s latched onto > a false difference, it is likely to go off on a useless tangent, chasing > changes to a line you don’t care about. I g

Re: [fossil-users] Limiting cruft in my repos

On May 10, 2017, at 6:40 PM, David Mason wrote: > > On 10 May 2017 at 17:05, Artur Shepilko wrote: > Not sure about the objectives the students are learning in this > course, but if it in any way relates to programming, recognizing as > to what to keep

Re: [fossil-users] Problem with: fossil revert -r xxx

On May 11, 2017, at 5:03 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 5/11/17, Ross Berteig wrote: >> On 5/10/2017 8:54 PM, Ron Aaron wrote: >>> >>> I tried to revert to a good revision 'xxx' using "fossil revert -r xxx" >> >> But in my experience, fossil revert is a

Re: [fossil-users] How to transfer/move/upload local repository to chiselapp.com

On May 15, 2017, at 8:21 AM, Roy Keene wrote: > > what you are probably doing now is creating a new repo with the same project > code then pushing to that, which won't work out great. To clarify, one of the things Fossil does when it creates a new repository is to generate

Re: [fossil-users] /dev/null and /dev/urandom not available ?

On May 13, 2017, at 6:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Are you running the commands above as root? …and if so, I would guess the only reason you’re running it as root is so that it can listen on port 80, in which case I *strongly* encourage you to bind Fossil to localhost on a

Re: [fossil-users] Where can I find a pre-compiled 32-bit Linux version?

On May 15, 2017, at 12:54 PM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > I need a pre-compiled 32-bit Linux version of the release fossil > (The same Windows version says: This is fossil version 2.2 [81d7d3f43e] > 2017-04-11 20:54:55 UTC) Here: goo.gl/Tp7Foq It’s built on a 32-bit CentOS 5

Re: [fossil-users] crlf-glob

On May 15, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: > > On 2017-05-15 23:09, Warren Young wrote: >> On May 15, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: >>> >>> Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is t

Re: [fossil-users] crlf-glob

On May 15, 2017, at 3:27 PM, Thomas wrote: > > Does it really matter in the 21st century if a line is terminated by CR, LF, > or CR/LF anymore? Notepad.exe in Windows 10 Creator’s Edition still only works properly with CR+LF. Since that’s the default handler for *.txt

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

On Jun 9, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Ross Berteig wrote: > > I do think that the JSON support is close to solid enough to be on by default. For functionality alone, that is surely true, but in the face of malice? Parsers are notoriously difficult to make bomb-proof. Even if the

Re: [fossil-users] bug : /zip or /tar error page response return HTTP/1.1 200 OK

On Jun 9, 2017, at 7:11 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Perhaps /tarball and /zip are special in the sense that they are often > accessed by scripts. I don’t have any data on whether that is true, but you are right that /webpages frequently accessed by scripts should return

Re: [fossil-users] bug export --git : error: multiple updates for ref ... not allowed

On Jun 21, 2017, at 8:48 PM, er38h...@yahoo.co.jp wrote: > > bug export --git : error: multiple updates for ref ... not allowed > > Git generates errors due to fossil inappropriate export code. I’m glad someone decided to tackle this problem. It is only a minor inconvenience to cancel

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil JSON API: How to create a wiki page?

On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > If you leave quotes off of the property names, it's not json Yes, but that’s only one of the three problems here. The other two are: 1. It should diagnose the error correctly. (The error has nothing to do with memory

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil JSON API: How to create a wiki page?

On Jun 6, 2017, at 5:51 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > When I try something similar with: > > curl -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"authToken": > "mytoken",\ >"payload": {"name": “foo", "content": "bar"}}' >

Re: [fossil-users] "fossil http" doubts

On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > 2. I want to validate the web pages: Validate the HTML, check for > broken links, etc, using for example the W3C validation tools. If you’re using something like curl or wget to pull the web pages, there’s typically a way to set

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil JSON API: How to create a wiki page?

On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > BTW- there is an API intended just for checking whether json is built in: > /json/HAI (from lolcatz jargon... it made sense at the time (2011)). Then I have a new bug to file: it doesn’t respond KTHXBYE as it obviously

Re: [fossil-users] Webpage for multiple fossil repositories - configuration options?

On Jun 5, 2017, at 3:08 PM, John Pateman wrote: > > Is it possible to customise the appearance of this webpage without having to > set it up a full web server? Say $ fossil ui Then in the browser that pops up, go to Admin > Skins, and edit the files presented, or

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil JSON API: How to create a wiki page?

On Jun 6, 2017, at 1:09 PM, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I don't know how the page name is supposed to be given in the URL. The document you point to says it’s supposed to be sent in the payload, not in the request URL: $ curl -H "Content-Type:

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

On Sep 19, 2017, at 3:22 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > But I'm not sure if I want to implement that in Fossil just because another > unrelated piece of software makes bad decisions… I think you have *two* uses of zip/tarball here, not one: Fossil’s built-in mechanism for providing

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

On Sep 18, 2017, at 6:49 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > I'm looking at ignoring some files when an archive (zip/tarball) is created > by Fossil. What’s a good example where you’d want to do that? If anything, I find Fossil zip/tarball to produce *less* than I want in a release

Re: [fossil-users] Ignoring files/directories in automated zip files?

On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:32 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > /first-10-checkins /timeline?n=10=1970-01-01 You could also use this for Tickets reports: /bugs /rptview?rn=3 /wishlist /rptview?rn=2 Those being the report IDs of my

Re: [fossil-users] Shameless self-promotion

> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:12 PM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I would like to have a stronger argument against rebasing, preferrably with > an example. It’s been hashed over here on the mailing list many times before. Just search the archives for “git rebase”. The short argument I

Re: [fossil-users] Continued issues with read-only repository

On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > xyzzy...Nothing happens. You win 10 geek points today. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

On Oct 14, 2017, at 4:16 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > Please review the enhanced-symlink branch. Aside from a manifest.symlinks file appearing at the project root, what should we see? How do we test it? For example, if I declare a file to be a symlink in the repository

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

On Oct 16, 2017, at 4:44 PM, Arseniy Terekhin wrote: > > What should "ln" do on FAT16/32 and exFAT filesystems? Well, I'd just expect > fossil to not bother creating any links and maybe give a warning. Or, write two copies of the file, then on checkin either: a) take the

Re: [fossil-users] enhanced-symlink branch

On Oct 16, 2017, at 7:28 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > I don't have the luxury of Cygwin because my end users won't have it. You can just distribute the DLL, then. In cases where your users *may* have Cygwin installed, it is considered polite to install the DLL only when

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned file replacement is broken?

On Aug 29, 2017, at 10:59 PM, BohwaZ wrote: > > But if you don't sync between removal and add, the 0 bytes bug is happening. I’ve seen this, too, but didn’t report it because there is the workaround you’ve discovered. ___

Re: [fossil-users] Empty file constantly being deleted

On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:21 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/help?cmd=ignore-glob for the > documentation on the ignore-glob setting. I confess that the > documentation is a bit thin at the moment and needs enhancement, but > it is what we have for now.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil backup snapshots using Tarsnap

On Sep 26, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > > # fossil sqlite3 --version -R /mnt/kd/fossil/astlinux.fossil > 3.17.0 2017-02-13 16:02:40 ada05cfa86ad7f5645450ac7a2a21c9aa6e57d2c That would be Fossil 2.0, a transitional release meant to ease the move from

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil backup snapshots using Tarsnap

On Sep 26, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > > sqlite3 /mnt/kd/fossil/astlinux.fossil .dump > > "$CUSTOM_BACKUP_DIR/astlinux.fossil.dump” [snip] > This seems to work well with limited testing ... Am I missing anything ? That’s more or less what we do here

Re: [fossil-users] strange problem with graphical diff

On Aug 23, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 8/23/17, j. van den hoff wrote: >> unable to create directory /var > > It is trying to create a temporary file in which to store the one of > the two sides of the diff. Can you trace the problem by

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil README symlink

On Oct 17, 2017, at 7:12 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > requiring JavaScript access has proven to be > fatal for his project's usage of Fossil. I noticed a complete lack of “me, too” in that thread. Usually when one of the other VCSes does something different from Fossil,

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil README symlink

On Oct 18, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > The more web apps that ship with stringent Content-Security-Policy headers, > the fewer arguments we’ll have for allowing JS on web pages. Wow…caffeine isn’t working yet, obviously. What I meant to say i

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

On Oct 18, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 10/18/17, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> On Oct 18, 2017, at 3:44 AM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >>> >>> The more web apps that ship with stringen

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

On Oct 18, 2017, at 8:51 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > > style-$hash2.css where $hash2 is a hash (or prefix thereof) > of the contents of style.css, possibly combined with the Fossil checkin > prefix. If style.css is stored as a Fossil artifact, we get that for free. If it’s

Re: [fossil-users] Content-Security-Policy Was: Fossil README symlink

On Oct 18, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> I'll have to add a "/fossil.js” resource While you’re about it, I’d suggest shipping /fossil-$hash.js instead and settin

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

On Nov 14, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 11/14/17, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> If anyone wants it, they can consider it to be under the SIMH license: > > Can I make it would of the built-in skin options

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. (fwd)

On Nov 14, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > https://tangentsoft.com/pidp8i/finfo?name=libexec/mkos8 > > Don't take this the wrong way, but that is a mig

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 24, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Which is better? > > A: https://www.fossil-scm.org/a/timeline > B: https://www.fossil-scm.org/b/timeline I prefer A because I don’t like having to dig for details. Hiding details isn’t the answer to clutter. Drawing

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The big down-side is that less > information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll > more. But that seems to be the trend with websites these days…. The design ideas I tapped into this were old when

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Nov 22, 2017, at 7:43 AM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:42:56 -0700 > Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > >>> This seems more like a complaint about the user interface. >> >> How does that observation get us to

Re: [fossil-users] Downloading from Fossil. Was: Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Nov 22, 2017, at 9:56 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 11/22/17, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >> 1. Visit https://example.com >> 2. Click Timeline (and how would my users know to do that?) >> 3. Click checkin ID. >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Nov 28, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Mike Burns wrote: > > > You won't get Fossil/SQLite running on a Commodore 64 without a lot of work. > > What are the chances someone will take up take up this challenge, and have a > Commodore 64 or Apple II version of fossil up and

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:53 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > > There's a small display glitch, the mouse cursor over the > Basic/Advanced button is set to "text selection" mode instead of the > usual "hand with the index finger up" for clickable links. It can be fixed by adding

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 7:26 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > The "selected entry" highlighting, such as seen here: > >https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=trunk > > Still looks goofy in the Modern View, especially using Edge. Your > help in fixing that problem will be

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > [*] To be clear, that means the element ends up with two classes. Even more clear: ... td.timelineSelected { border-width: 2px; background-color: #ffc; box-shadow: 4px 4px 2px rgba(

Re: [fossil-users] CSP for Fossil. Was: A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Apparently what I would need to do is generate HTML without all of the > onclick= and style= attributes Yes. > but make sure every element has an id= attribute. Or at least a class attribute, when you want multiple elements

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:27 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote: > >> It can be fixed by adding href="#" into the elements > > Using "Inspect" on chrome, I found that adding: > > cursor: pointer; > > inside "element.style" fix the problem. That feels more heavy-handed to me. My

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 29, 2017, at 8:26 AM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 11/29/17, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> >>https://imgur.com/a/TEWjA > > I think we'd like the selection mechanism to somehow highlight the > entire row I don’t t

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 7:04 PM, Steve Landers wrote: > > Note that I would retain the rounded corners on Warren’s backgrounds, they > make the visuals “softer”. You can have that without the stroked borders: td.timelineTableCell { border-radius: 10px;

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 28, 2017, at 3:12 AM, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I think the one important thing is that all involved HTML elements have a > 'class' or 'id' tag. Yes. Several times in making my last custom Fossil skin, I’ve had to employ some rather clever CSS selector trickery to target

Re: [fossil-users] Weird behavior on Chisel, perhaps a version mismatch?

On Nov 29, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 12:02:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: >> On 11/29/17, Jacob MacDonald wrote: >>> Ah, I see. It seems strange to me that the policy didn't get set when I >>> cloned. How can I

Re: [fossil-users] Windows make fail: mkcss.c

On Nov 30, 2017, at 8:16 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > >mkcss.exe ..\src\default_css.txt default_css.h > ..\src\default_css.txt:1: syntax error Has src/default_css.txt changed? Try reverting it. The fact that you have an evolving stream of different errors is a

Re: [fossil-users] diff coloring missing?

On Nov 30, 2017, at 9:07 AM, Marc Simpson wrote: > > Re: CSS issues: I think the default skin would be a bit more readable > with 1 or 2 pixels of space between these newly added commit > bubbles/boxes. > > (Adjacency currently yields a doubly thick shared line.) My original

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

On Nov 23, 2017, at 5:19 AM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > They want maximum results for minimum effort? That may be normal, but > it's still whiney. If “normal” is “whiney”, it ceases to be a useful disparagement unless you intend to change society. This mailing list is not a good

Re: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes

On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:46 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > On Nov 27, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: >> >> The big down-side is that less >> information is visible on a single screen now, so you have to scroll >

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:19 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > So Warren edited a file at the same exact time as tangent? Fossil arguably has a bug here, where if you check a change in as local user name “tangent”, as I do here, then *later* do a “fossil sync” to a URL with a

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

On Dec 18, 2017, at 8:22 PM, jungle boogie wrote: > > I can't remember the repo drh mentioned TH3, the paid-for test harness for SQLite: https://sqlite.org/th3.html > So if you committed something as drh with an improved overview section > showing gpg keys, would

Re: [fossil-users] TAB size in displayed content

On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Thomas <tho...@dateiliste.com> wrote: > > On 2017-12-11 22:55, Warren Young wrote: >> notepad.exe and Internet Explorer also obey the 8-character tab standard. >> Go tell Microsoft it is wrong, too. > > I'm not sure how many people

Re: [fossil-users] -db-check compression ratio

On Dec 13, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Tony Papadimitriou wrote: > > * The first is the inclusion of un-versioned files which although inflate the > total file size have no play in the versioning part, which is what I believe > the compression ratio was meant to highlight. If unversioned

[fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

I just tried to rebuild a Fossil repo that I’d lost permission to read due to some sysadmin silliness, and got spammed by this in a rapid loop: PRAGMA database_list SQLITE_CANTOPEN: cannot open file at line 36229 of [1a584e4999] SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_unix.c:36229: (2)

Re: [fossil-users] How to share a fossil repo using static http (without the cgi)?

On Dec 12, 2017, at 12:33 PM, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote: > > I want share a fossil repo using a static http server Call something like this from a crontab: $ wget -O /var/www/html/dl/my-project.zip http://localhost:8080/zip Then in the HTML: Download >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. GitHub

On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Would Git or GitHub have told me about those prior tickets? GitHub is pretty good about surfacing such information, as long as the ticket references the checkin ID. In fact, GitHub can be a bit overeager about

Re: [fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

On Dec 13, 2017, at 9:26 AM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > ...I’d lost permission to read... > > SQLITE_CANTOPEN: os_unix.c:36229: (2) open(/nunya/binness.fossil-wal) - No > such file or directory Actually, it looks like it’s opening the DB for reading bu

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

On Dec 13, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Tino Lange wrote: > > The directory/directories will keep existing! Given that Fossil doesn’t know anything about directories, other than as containers for the files it manages, I’m not sure that isn’t the right thing. To have Fossil remove

Re: [fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:03 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 13 December 2017 at 07:58, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > >> I’d feel differently if Fossil owned the directories, but it doesn’t. >> They’re mine; leave them

Re: [fossil-users] Bug: fossil rebuild loops indefinitely if -R file cannot be opened

On Dec 13, 2017, at 1:37 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > > On 12/13/17, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: >> I just tried to rebuild a Fossil repo that I’d lost permission to read due >> to some sysadmin silliness, and got spammed by this

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

On Dec 11, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > > I’d go as far as #F8F8F8 myself. One of my Fossil projects’ skins is based on Khaki, which hasn’t yet been restyled to override the base styles for the timeline boxes, so I get light gray on yellow,

Re: [fossil-users] [Bug?] [server] Processes of Fossil popping up unexpectedly

On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Olivier R. wrote: > > #0 0x7fd8ff85e873 in __select_nocancel () at > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 > #0 0x7fd8ff85e873 in __select_nocancel () at > ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:81 > #0 0x7fd8ff858ba0 in

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >