Re: [fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

On 10 December 2017 at 17:57, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote: > Thus said Michai Ramakers on Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:21:02 +0100: > >> michai@work-lap:/tmp/f/f$ f ver >> This is fossil version 1.33 [b00e60194e] 2015-08-22 12:42:15 UTC > > Since then Fo

Re: [fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

On 10 December 2017 at 16:15, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it normal that I can't seem to clone the fossil-scm.org repo using > this old version? Apparently I have been living under a rock. I also seem to be unable to open the cloned (using current trunk)

[fossil-users] trouble cloning current fossil-scm.org repo with old fossil (2015)

Hi, I haven't tracked trunk since end of 2015. Is it normal that I can't seem to clone the fossil-scm.org repo using this old version? michai@work-lap:/tmp/fold$ f ver This is fossil version 1.33 [b00e60194e] 2015-08-22 12:42:15 UTC michai@work-lap:/tmp/fold$ f clone https://www.fossil-scm.org/

Re: [fossil-users] diff of wiki-page

On 15 July 2016 at 20:16, Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 15, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> 1) does there happen to be a "howto" anywhere describing quick setup >> w.r.t. security, perhaps f

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

Hello, On 12 February 2016 at 20:37, Richard Hipp wrote: > Just an FYI: I use a circa-2002 iBook for testing SQLite on (32-bit > big-endian) PPC. The iBook is loaded with Mac OS 10.2. 20GB hard > disk and 256MB of RAM. > > ... Just for fun I tried to build a recent Fossil on

Re: [fossil-users] Compiling and running Fossil on old hardware

On 13 February 2016 at 21:45, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote: > On 2/13/16, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Just for fun I tried to build a recent Fossil on a Pentium 150 box >> with 40 MB RAM, no swap, using GCC 4.1.2 prerelease on N

Re: [fossil-users] typo in admin_sql wiki page

fixed, thx On 23 November 2015 at 21:43, j. van den hoff wrote: > someone with write access to the fossil repo might do a minor good deed ;-): > > In the sentence > > "Only *a* the first statement in the entry box will be run." > > the `a' enclosed in the asterisks should

Re: [fossil-users] Multiple Projects in one Repo

Hello, On 12 September 2015 at 14:34, Oliver Friedrich wrote: > I want to give a thought on how I use fossil regularly and on what I would > love as a feature. > > While fossil is easy to set up and maintain, I often have several small > projects that seem to be

Re: [fossil-users] permuted index doc-page: request for feedback (was: Remove redundant shun links from doc page.)

On 24 August 2015 at 22:42, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 August 2015 at 12:55, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 August 2015 at 20:30, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think the permuted index should be listed on the sitemap? It's

Re: [fossil-users] permuted index doc-page: request for feedback (was: Remove redundant shun links from doc page.)

On 17 August 2015 at 21:12, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Another suggestion was to move the list of canonical titles in front of the original permuted index - which sounds perfect to me. Done in http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/49a77b5184ef2f5a , and for preview visit http

Re: [fossil-users] permuted index doc-page: request for feedback (was: Remove redundant shun links from doc page.)

On 24 August 2015 at 20:30, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think the permuted index should be listed on the sitemap? It's already in the header as 'Docs' but so are wiki, timeline, tickets, etc. I don't know... To me permuted index didn't ring a bell before I saw Fossil,

Re: [fossil-users] permuted index doc-page: request for feedback (was: Remove redundant shun links from doc page.)

On 24 August 2015 at 13:29, Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavri...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Stephan Beal wrote: On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Sergei Gavrikov wrote: Two lists (C/P) look too long for human. Perhaps, Fossil documentation reached the state when tag cloud

[fossil-users] permuted index doc-page: request for feedback (was: Remove redundant shun links from doc page.)

[ conversation about appearance of permuted index page from a while ago ] On 22 June 2015 at 20:11, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote: On 6/22/2015 10:46 AM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: I agree we all think differently, but the output should collate the descriptions while keeping only a

[fossil-users] exact use of 'ckout' as pseudo-version to indicate current working directory

Hello, I remembered there was either 'ckout' or 'checkout' or similar as pseudo-version, e.g. when wanting to preview locally changed web-docs using 'fossil server' or 'fossil ui' from within a check-out. The 'ckout' keyword was listed in 'embeddeddoc.wik'; I expected it to be in

Re: [fossil-users] fossil compile errors

On 12 August 2015 at 07:18, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 August 2015 at 22:16, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: which compiler/version? (Clang?) Yes, correct. FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 fwiw, builds clean with 3.6.2 and 3.5.2 here (I don't have your version

Re: [fossil-users] fossil compile errors

On 12 August 2015 at 06:32, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: I noticed a compile warning generated while building Fossil from latest: ./src/main.c:902:18: warning: using the result of an assignment as a condition without parentheses [-Wparentheses] while( zOption =

Re: [fossil-users] quick poll: do you generally use add/rm or mv

On 5 August 2015 at 17:35, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: Let's take one case where Fossil and Unix disagree about mv. mkdir -p x/dir fossil new x.fossil cd x f open ../x.fossil echo hello dir/file f addremove f mv -hard dir dir2 The last command prints: RENAME dir dir2

Re: [fossil-users] Idea: automatic check for extras prior to commit

On 3 August 2015 at 21:31, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: Many times I've created files, modified existing files to reference them, tested, and committed, only to later discover I forgot to add the newly created files to the repository. After making this mistake, I know I'm supposed

Re: [fossil-users] fine(r) commit granularity

On 3 August 2015 at 21:08, Andy Goth andrew.m.g...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/28/2015 9:18 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Jul 28, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: split commit within one file in smaller chunks when one forgets to ’safe often, commit often’ or simply wants to divide

Re: [fossil-users] fine(r) commit granularity

grr... On 3 August 2015 at 21:50, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: FWIW, I try to have small commits here; occasionally when unrelated changes have been made in a single file, I simply use the word 'and' in the commit-message, and that's about it. I agree that manually

Re: [fossil-users] quick poll: do you generally use add/rm or mv

On 1 August 2015 at 17:46, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I was wondering what you generally do for directory trees in motion - use add/rm or mv ? And: the benefit of fossil having a concept of 'moved file/dir' is that the user can trace ancestry crossing moves/renames

[fossil-users] quick poll: do you generally use add/rm or mv

Hello, I have been avoiding 'fossil mv' a bit until recently, because I didn't trust it for no good reason. I reckon since it is in trunk, it is considered stable. In project-trees here, I move/rename dirs and files quite often. What I did earlier, was simply to move them as per filesystem, and

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 30 July 2015 at 10:44, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 30 July 2015 at 00:07, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Michai Ramakers wrote: I was unclear; this is the corresponding timeline: === 2015-07-29 === 19:58:39 [70b61c707b] *CURRENT* x (user: michai tags

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 29 July 2015 at 21:29, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Michai Ramakers wrote: Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2' afterwards. I think the following change will fix the issue

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 31 July 2015 at 18:05, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Michai Ramakers wrote: I don't think I understand what goes on here; I can't see the difference between filesystem-mv (no fossil involved), and 'fossil mv --hard', really. Sometimes, Fossil will show a rename

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 29 July 2015 at 16:50, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, using 'fossil mv' for the first time, and for some reason I don't understand what happens here (see pasted output) - instead of renaming a dir, it creates a zero-byte file (and leaves the original dir as-is). I

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 29 July 2015 at 22:02, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 29 July 2015 at 21:29, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Michai Ramakers wrote: Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 29 July 2015 at 21:29, Joe Mistachkin sql...@mistachkin.com wrote: Michai Ramakers wrote: Right... creating the target-dir 'd2' beforehand worked in my case; any subdir existing under 'd' seems to be moved under 'd2' afterwards. I think the following change will fix the issue

Re: [fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

On 29 July 2015 at 22:02, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: (the corresponding timeline shows 2 added and 2 deleted files, and history is lost) I mean of course: there is no relation between the added and deleted files, history-wise. Michai

[fossil-users] 'mv' semantics

Hello, using 'fossil mv' for the first time, and for some reason I don't understand what happens here (see pasted output) - instead of renaming a dir, it creates a zero-byte file (and leaves the original dir as-is). I have the feeling I'm doing something really simple really wrong. Ideas..?

Re: [fossil-users] total number of bytes in a commit?

On 27 July 2015 at 14:21, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: is the total number of bytes in a commit (the cumulative size of the diffs) of a check-in visible somewhere? to get that you'll need to sum

[fossil-users] SQLITE_NOTICE while viewing fossil-scm.org timeline

Hello, saw this (once) at the top of the web-page when viewing the timeline on fossil-scm.org: SQLITE_NOTICE: recovered 8 frames from WAL file /fossil/fossil.fossil-wal Reloading the page a few times didn't reproduce it. It came up earlier in a post - perhaps informational for someone,

Re: [fossil-users] location of .fossil-settings/

On 24 July 2015 at 12:22, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: I think I know the answer to this, but want to check: the only valid location of a '.fossil-settings' dir is in the local check-out root, right

Re: [fossil-users] revert all files: doesn't work

On 22 July 2015 at 11:20, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:25 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: This does not answer your question, but perhaps what you were looking for (i.e. revert all files in the local check-out to a revision) is 'fossil

Re: [fossil-users] moving part of existing branch onto another branch

On 22 July 2015 at 07:47, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Michai Ramakers on Wed, 22 Jul 2015 00:48:03 +0200: If I then move B to new branch 'parked-here', then move D (back) to trunk, then close leaf A, is the result something that could cause problems later

Re: [fossil-users] submitting issue reports to/about fossil-scm.org

On 21 July 2015 at 22:01, Adam Jensen han...@riseup.net wrote: On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:40:27 -0700 jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not a maintainer but this is what I have done in the past, with guidance of others. 0. clone the repo 1. make your changes 2. fossil changes

[fossil-users] moving part of existing branch onto another branch

Hello, question about pitfalls of fixing 'multiple open leaves' by closing all but one: Suppose I have a trunk with 4 check-ins A, B, C and D (in order of creation), and then decide to move B and C onto a separate branch. If I then move B to new branch 'parked-here', then move D (back) to

Re: [fossil-users] close leaf from command-line, and 'apropos(1)'-like behaviour?

On 21 July 2015 at 11:12, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Is it an idea to have an 'apropos(1)'-like subcommand or option to the... Sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me, but not sure how bothersome

[fossil-users] close leaf from command-line, and 'apropos(1)'-like behaviour?

Hello, I was searching for a way to close a leaf from the command-line, and didn't find it. (The new 'check-in-edit' branch can do this using 'amend --close'.) Is there a way using legacy commands? Also, I notice there are generally questions on this list of the form 'where is command XYZ to do

[fossil-users] personal workflow: branches to subdivide big repo

Hello, (tl;dr = 'branches are nice') ok, this is probably somewhat obvious but it hit me only quite late. In a previous post I wondered whether people use nested / separate repos or one big repo to host a big project

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

On 18 July 2015 at 11:54, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Sergei Gavrikov sergei.gavri...@gmail.com wrote: --edit-comment option. However, with a forest the options Fossil CLI increasingly resembles Git CLI :-) See:

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

Hello, [ unrelated meta-comment follows ] On 16 July 2015 at 08:19, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: for bonus points (certainly not necessary), allow multiple -tag/-cancel flags: ... I'm a gmail-user, and for some reason they seem to have cranked up their spam-filter settings

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

Hello, On 16 July 2015 at 07:06, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling amending checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch? ... FWIW #2, adjusting check-in background colour of tip is pretty much the only

Re: [fossil-users] Any interest in testing/merging check-in-edit branch?

Hello, On 16 July 2015 at 07:06, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Has anyone (other than me) tested the changes for enabling amending checkins from the command line in the check-in-edit branch? I think it's ready, but it certainly could use additional testing given that

Re: [fossil-users] Remove redundant shun links from doc page.

Hello, On 22 June 2015 at 20:11, Ross Berteig r...@cheshireeng.com wrote: On 6/22/2015 10:46 AM, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: I agree we all think differently, but the output should collate the descriptions while keeping only a single common link. The difference with the wiki 'keyword in

Re: [fossil-users] view added tags w.r.t. last check-in

On 20 May 2015 at 05:14, Ron W ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:33 PM, bch brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: I don't understand what you mean when you say tag. Could you elaborate or rephrase your problem? See http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/help?cmd=tag Basically, Michai

[fossil-users] view added tags w.r.t. last check-in

Hello, is there a way to list added tags w.r.t. the last check-in? What I do now is 'fossil changes' and 'fossil extras' to view changed/new files, and if those report nothing, I am assuming nothing needs to be checked in. After I add a tag to a repo on the local host, I still need to

Re: [fossil-users] build.wiki patch

On 2 March 2015 at 22:45, Tontyna tont...@ultrareal.de wrote: And please: In the '2.0 Compiling/MinGW' paragraph a note about not using MinGW-4.0 cause it breaks e.g. the extras command: thanks, added. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] server.wiki patch

On 1 March 2015 at 20:52, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Minor patch to add information about inetd on FreeBSD to the server.wiki page. ... Please see whether [fbbf640b] is ok for you. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list

[fossil-users] inetd-server + multiple repos

Hello, toying a bit with Fossil serving through inetd, as per http://fossil-scm.org/xfer/doc/trunk/www/server.wiki , for some reason I can't get the example shown on that page working when using a directory-with-multiple-repos as last argument, instead of a single repo, e.g. stream tcp

Re: [fossil-users] inetd-server + multiple repos

On 2 March 2015 at 18:10, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Michai, On 2 March 2015 at 07:03, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Unless someone has a quick clue, I can bisect it later today. But probably it's user error. Do you see inetd started on port 12345

[fossil-users] 'fossil http' seems to output a page multiple times on amd64 (?)

Hello, while playing around with Fossil from inetd, saw some weirdness on trunk tip ([14302b6cc7]) between amd64 and x86 linux and netbsd. Narrowing it down a bit, I did the following: ./fossil new test.fossil ( echo 'GET /index HTTP/1.1'; echo 'Host: localhost'; echo ) | ./fossil http

Re: [fossil-users] server.wiki patch

On 1 March 2015 at 06:48, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Minor patch to add information about inetd on FreeBSD to the server.wiki page. I haven't tested fossil on openBSD but if its the same as freebsd, feel free to modify the patch to include that information, too. just for

Re: [fossil-users] (no subject)

On 27 February 2015 at 21:17, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Attached is a list of all, what I believe are comments, from src/*.c that contain checkin. I'm assuming these are diffs against trunk tip of the time of writing, but perhaps next time it's useful to mention the

Re: [fossil-users] (no subject)

On 27 February 2015 at 21:17, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Attached is a list of all, what I believe are comments, from src/*.c that contain checkin. I'll pick this one up. Did you mean to change the actual option-names too? Help will be regenerated after a recompile, after a

Re: [fossil-users] (no subject)

Hello, On 28 February 2015 at 14:13, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: On 28 February 2015 at 01:44, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: I'll pick this one up. Did you mean to change the actual option-names too? No, that was probably a mistake and my misunderstanding

Re: [fossil-users] (no subject)

On 28 February 2015 at 21:50, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Michai Ramakers on Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:44:59 +0100: I'll pick this one up. Did you mean to change the actual option-names too? My vote is to leave checkin without the dash, and after a bit of sed

Re: [fossil-users] Spelling corrections for fossil-scm.org

On 26 February 2015 at 18:19, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: I found the following spelling mistakes on the website. The misspelled word begins and ends in *. thank you; I can fix this in a few hours from now, unless anyone else is eager to do so earlier. Michai

Re: [fossil-users] Spelling corrections for fossil-scm.org

On 26 February 2015 at 18:19, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: I found the following spelling mistakes on the website. The misspelled word begins and ends in *. ... Please verify that http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/05fc09c5ddc1b00f is what you meant. Not changed (yet):

Re: [fossil-users] Spelling corrections for fossil-scm.org

On 26 February 2015 at 21:50, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: Your changes look good and my diffs should answer any questions you have. I didn't modify the quotes one after all as someone misspelled but perhaps we could have the correct spelling in parentheses. Git approaches the

Re: [fossil-users] Spelling corrections for fossil-scm.org

On 26 February 2015 at 22:02, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: There's 51 places where 'checkin' currently (trunk) occur. I'll work on diffs for those to make it check-in/s. Unless anyone likes to have checkin/s check-in/s in the documents. no need for diffs here - this is very

Re: [fossil-users] Improving Fossil's Look

Hello, On 18 February 2015 at 18:42, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 February 2015 at 16:24, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: Talking of documentation, and just out of curiosity: does anyone know if there are plans to update Jim Schimp's Fossil book (by himself

Re: [fossil-users] Improving Fossil's Look

Hello, On 18 February 2015 at 00:43, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I think the next step of the ongoing Fossil makeover should be to improve the homepage: https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki Suggestions and especially mockups of how this front page should look

Re: [fossil-users] New search features

Hello, On 2 February 2015 at 19:46, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote: On 2 February 2015 at 10:32, mario ma...@include-once.org wrote: P.S. Could we get like `dev-1.30.1` tags in between major releases? This is one of those significant new features that might warrant it. I agree

Re: [fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

On 25 January 2015 at 00:10, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Richard Hipp on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 16:27:55 -0500: I would hope that the local machine knows that it cannot provide IPv6 service and that getaddrinfo() should therefore always return an IPv4 address. But

Re: [fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

On 25 January 2015 at 00:09, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 04:57:17PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: But another problem emerged during testing. It seems that Michai's machine is not accepting the certificate on https://www.fossil-scm.org/. It is

Re: [fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

On 25 January 2015 at 13:54, Joerg Sonnenberger jo...@britannica.bec.de wrote: Ah, do you have security/mozilla-rootcerts installed? NetBSD doesn't provide a default set of CAs out of the box. that did it, thx. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list

[fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

Hello, for some reason I can't seem to clone fossil's own repo from at least 2 machines behind the same NAT-router: With fossil built from recent trunk: michai@delle:/tmp/f/f$ mkdir f2 michai@delle:/tmp/f/f$ cd f2 michai@delle:/tmp/f/f/f2$ ../fossil ver This is fossil version 1.30

Re: [fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

On 24 January 2015 at 20:43, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: michai@delle:/tmp/f/f/f2$ ../fossil clone http://fossil-scm.org f.f cannot connect to host fossil-scm.org:80 Clone done, sent: 0 received: 0 ip: 2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe96:b959 server returned an error - clone

Re: [fossil-users] cloning from fossil-scm.org fails (from one machine..?)

On 24 January 2015 at 22:00, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Does your network have IPv6 support? none whatsoever. Ok, so apparently Fossil has recently had IPv6 support enabled in the client and it does seem that it is choosing to use IPv6 in favor of IPv4, even

Re: [fossil-users] How you can help make Fossil better....

Hello, if this can wait until Saturday, I would like to do this; I like Markdown quite a lot. Michai On 21 January 2015 at 03:50, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: There is a webpage (https://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki_rules) built into every Fossil that describes the Wiki formatting

Re: [fossil-users] Getting configure to find openssl on FreeBSD

Hello, more likely than not this is not related, but perhaps it gives a hint in the right direction anyway: on NetBSD there is also an openssl in the base-system, and one in pkgsrc (NetBSD's equivalent of ports). In my case, fossil's ./configure could find openssl, but the resulting binary could

Re: [fossil-users] how to use git to lose data

Hello, On 3 September 2014 09:12, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: On Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:07:48 -0600 Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com wrote: Interesting you should write this. One of my newest uses for fossil is the one case in which I'm using it distributed (even though all by myself):

Re: [fossil-users] Stupid Fossil Tricks #3329 of N: file line numbers

On 27 August 2014 18:00, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: You likely already know that you can link to specific sections of code in a repo by adding ln=Start-End to the URL params of the pages which show file content, e.g.:

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' missing contents; 'finfo --brief' ok

On 27 July 2014 20:35, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-23 12:37 GMT+02:00 Michai Ramakers: Hello, seems 'fossil finfo' is missing output: Fixed here: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/dcb6076572 thanks for the fix, seems to work fine. Michai

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

On 27 July 2014 22:58, Jan Nijtmans jan.nijtm...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-22 11:35 GMT+02:00 Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com: Hello, while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is recent default

Re: [fossil-users] diff command and 'permission denied'

On 26 July 2014 12:26, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Hello, I'm working on a simple course - using markdown markup for text files and store few pdf files. I changed settings for 'diff' command to 'meld', but then reverted back to use built-in diff for 'diff' command and 'meld for

Re: [fossil-users] diff command and 'permission denied'

On 26 July 2014 18:53, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org writes: It can. Run ``fossil ui'' and browse to Admin-Settings Well, the error is result of applying 'fossil ui' on diff-command settting. ;) The issue here is that you cannot unset a variable

[fossil-users] 'test-page++.wiki' in release-checklist not accessible atm

Hello, while browsing fossil's docs, I noticed the 'test-page++.wiki' in item #4 on https://fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki is not accessible. I don't really understand why - building that version locally and running using 'server' works ok. Probably known /

Re: [fossil-users] cloning using phone as 'personal hotspot'

On 24 July 2014 10:17, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: While thus cloning the fossil-scm.org repo, I see some messages of the form unknown command: [×ÇË] (other messages with similar non-ascii chars

Re: [fossil-users] cloning using phone as 'personal hotspot'

On 24 July 2014 13:01, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: remembered that :-) (this SCM is so cool, it even fixes your internet! /advertisement) I'll probably give it another try tonight. i strongly

Re: [fossil-users] cloning using phone as 'personal hotspot'

On 24 July 2014 10:48, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 July 2014 10:17, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: While thus cloning the fossil-scm.org repo, I see some messages of the form

[fossil-users] 'finfo' missing contents; 'finfo --brief' ok

Hello, seems 'fossil finfo' is missing output: -- $ f finfo CHANGELOG History of src/bulb/bulb_consumer_and_test_firmware/CHANGELOG 2014-07-21 [ 2014-02-25 [ 2014-02-25 [ 2014-01-21 [ $ f finfo --brief CHANGELOG f9af729be7 2014-07-21 michai trunk bulb-fw: updated changelog to today bd6c0c3139

[fossil-users] 'finfo' or '/finfo' to display all diffs in sequence?

Hello, is it somehow possible to persuade 'finfo' or webpage '/finfo' to display the actual diffs (not aggregate diff) between each revisions of the artifact? Or: is there anoter page / CLI-command that does this? thx, Michai ___ fossil-users mailing

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' or '/finfo' to display all diffs in sequence?

On 23 July 2014 13:10, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com is it somehow possible to persuade 'finfo' or webpage '/finfo' to display the actual diffs (not aggregate diff) between each revisions of the artifact

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' or '/finfo' to display all diffs in sequence?

On 23 July 2014 13:53, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 July 2014 13:10, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com is it somehow

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' missing contents; 'finfo --brief' ok

On 23 July 2014 14:16, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: weird... I can't remember seeing this before; didn't bisect it (yet), i can tell you that this one is working: http://fossil-scm.org/index.html

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' or '/finfo' to display all diffs in sequence?

On 23 July 2014 14:36, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote: Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org writes: So you question translates to: Is there a way to show the sequence of edits the transformed one version of a file into another, rather than just the diff between the two files? Maybe he is thinking

Re: [fossil-users] 'finfo' missing contents; 'finfo --brief' ok

On 23 July 2014 14:24, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 July 2014 14:16, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: weird... I can't remember seeing this before; didn't bisect it (yet), i can tell

[fossil-users] cloning using phone as 'personal hotspot'

Hello, let's ask anyway: I'm currently toying a bit with my phone as 'personal wifi hotspot' for my laptop, thereby finally stepping into the 21st century, technology-wise. While thus cloning the fossil-scm.org repo, I see some messages of the form unknown command: [×ÇË] (other messages with

[fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

Hello, while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is recent default in trunk. (FWIW, I know there have been flaws in this area before, and although I am not a dev having/willing to deal with them, I

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

On 22 July 2014 11:35, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: while toying around with Andy Bradford's fix/analysis, found something else, which seems related to the no-initial-commit feature which is recent default in trunk. ... of course, forgot something: This is fossil version

Re: [fossil-users] unclustered vs private vs phantom and not syncing content

On 22 July 2014 10:27, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Andy Bradford on 12 Jul 2014 13:36:58 -0600: 2) The artifact rid was in the unclustered table, but when create_cluster() ran it prematurely removed it from the table. I have been able to

Re: [fossil-users] commits not seen on 2nd local worktree unless forcing initial commit

On 22 July 2014 11:48, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: (FWIW, I know there have been flaws in this area before, and although I am not a dev having/willing to deal with them, I agree with Jan that AFAIR i

[fossil-users] 'open --nested', quick poll

Hello, I was wondering how many of you use 'open --nested' to have nested workdirs? A bit of background: A long time ago I asked here how/why/if people divided multiple-target project-trees into repos; some (like me) use one big repo for all, and some use many small repos. So this is not a

Re: [fossil-users] unclustered vs private vs phantom and not syncing content

On 22 July 2014 17:29, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said Michai Ramakers on Tue, 22 Jul 2014 12:35:03 +0200: I can't seem to reproduce what you describe - either that, or I'm missing the point (did you mean 'merge' as in 'fossil merge'?). I'm assuming you left

Re: [fossil-users] 'open --nested', quick poll

On 22 July 2014 21:18, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: We are using -nested very successfully to break a large area of related but mostly independent sub-areas into multiple fossils. I'm very happy with it. BTW, the whole reason why the modern SCM approach used by fossil, git etc. is

[fossil-users] ls --age single_file gives SQL-error

Hello, is 'ls --age $single_filename' supported? For a vanilla file, I get an error: --- michai@main:~/proj/068$ ls -l scratch.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 michai users 56173 Jun 27 17:17 scratch.txt michai@main:~/proj/068$ f ls scratch.txt scratch.txt michai@main:~/proj/068$ f ls -v scratch.txt

Re: [fossil-users] ls --age single_file gives SQL-error

On 21 July 2014 11:43, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: datetime(checkin_mtime(4258,rid),'unixepoch') FROM vfile WHERE (pathname='scratch.txt' ) OR (pathname'sc f: SQL error: callback requested query

[fossil-users] possible inconsistency in /fileage?glob=... page

Hello, when I view file-ages of a subtree of the repo using the (extremely useful) 'glob=' property to '/fileage', the displayed 'relative-to' date of the tip doesn't match the displayed offsets of the artifacts. (offset is displayed as 38.9 days, while in fact the last checkin of the artifacts

  1   2   3   >