Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-10 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 11:47 PM wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 13:26:04 -0500 > From: Artur Shepilko > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite? > > > project they are working on. Then they use TortoiseSVN to (mostly) commit > > changes to their documents, sometimes to fetch older

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-06 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 12:57 PM wrote: > Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:18:09 -0500 > From: Artur Shepilko > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite? > Message-ID: > > How would you want to use such a GUI? > I mean practically what is a non-programmer user workflow that > involves a

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-06 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 8:07 AM wrote: > > Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 09:18:56 +0800 > From: Steve Landers > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite? > > Put differently, what can’t you do with “fossil ui” that you can do with a > native client? > You can't do: fossil add fossil ci

Re: [fossil-users] Perception of Fossil

2018-06-15 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 2:58 PM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 13:35:13 -0400 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Perception of Fossil > > An alternative design sketch: > > (4) The pullrequest command creates a "bundle" out of the "anon-patch" > branch and then transmits that

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 125, Issue 33

2018-06-15 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 5:20 PM, wrote: > > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 15:12:17 -0600 > From: Warren Young > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Perception of Fossil > > On Jun 14, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Ron W wrote: > > > > In another forum I follow,a commented claims that Fossi

[fossil-users] Perception of Fossil

2018-06-14 Thread Ron W
In another forum I follow,a commented claims that Fossil is designed for "cathedral development" not "bazaar development", so would be of little interest to anyone. Unfortunately, the poster did not elaborate on why. Except maybe possible issues scaling to a large number of contributors, I don't

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 121, Issue 22

2018-02-25 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:00 AM, <fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 04:37:38 -0500 > From: Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Minor Issues with Fossil 2.5 > > > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:11:

Re: [fossil-users] Minor Issues with Fossil 2.5

2018-02-25 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 4:11 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 10:11:04 +0100 > From: Florian Balmer Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Minor Issues with Fossil 2.5 > > I think that the "Last-Modified" header is much easier to

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 121, Issue 20

2018-02-24 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:14:33 +0100 > From: Florian Balmer > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Minor Issues with Fossil 2.5dg_ > pca...@mail.gmail.com >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 121, Issue 9

2018-02-13 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:42:59 +0100 > From: Gilles > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Windows GUI that allows diff between two, > revisions? > > Thanks for the tip. Fuel does have an

Re: [fossil-users] Windows GUI that allows diff between two revisions?

2018-02-12 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:19 PM, wrote: > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:06:26 +0100 > From: Gilles > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Windows GUI that allows diff between two > revisions? > > On 13/02/2018 00:33, Richard Hipp

Re: [fossil-users] Action-based automation and scripting

2018-01-28 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2018 17:22:39 -0500 > From: "Joe Mistachkin" > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Action-based automation and scripting > > The following pages may be of help to you: > >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 120, Issue 38

2018-01-27 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 14:13:29 -0800 > From: jungle Boogie > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Cross-link tech notes to commits > > On 21 December 2017 at 07:34, jungle Boogie

Re: [fossil-users] How to Embed WebM Videos to Fossil Wiki Pages?

2018-01-03 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:27 PM, wrote: > > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:04:20 +0200 > From: Martin Vahi > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: [fossil-users] How to Embed WebM Videos to Fossil Wiki Pages? > Message-ID:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 68

2018-01-03 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 22:48:18 + > From: John Pateman > Subject: [fossil-users] Interest in supporting Bugwarrior/Taskwarrior > integration from Fossil users? > > I have been

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 120, Issue 2

2018-01-01 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 6:48 PM, wrote: > Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2018 12:44:42 + > From: Sergey Bronnikov > Subject: [fossil-users] ticket length limitation > > For most by bugs it works fine, but command is failed when ticket body >

Re: [fossil-users] question regarding fuel-scm maintenance / ownership

2017-12-26 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 23:44:27 +0100 > From: Chris Drexler > Subject: [fossil-users] question regarding fuel-scm maintenance / > ownership > > Anyone here who knows any

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-17 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 9:11 PM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 18:13:17 + > From: Mark Janssen > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti > > Then what is the point of recvfrom? It will then just

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-17 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 09:56:57 + > From: Mark Janssen > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 28 > Message-ID: >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 28

2017-12-16 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:55 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti > > On 12/15/17, Andy Bradford wrote: > >

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. GitHub

2017-12-14 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:04:41 -0600 (CST) > From: Roy Keene > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil vs. GitHub > > One thing I often wish Fossil did was show other things (tickets, wiki >

Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti

2017-12-14 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:31 PM, wrote: > > Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 12:31:21 -0700 > From: Scott Robison > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] tangent vs. wyoung on recent commti > > I'd bet that you can commit as anyone and push it if

Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View

2017-12-12 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 1:16 PM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 14:00:01 +0100 > From: Florian Balmer > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Metadata in Timeline Verbose View > Message-ID: >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 119, Issue 6

2017-12-05 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:56 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:56:06 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil in Debian > > On 12/5/17, Roy Keene wrote: > > upstream doesn't make it easy,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 47

2017-11-27 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:50:29 + > From: Javier Guerra Giraldez > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Trolling GitHub for ideas > > the only github think i've really missed when using fossil

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 46

2017-11-26 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 09:22:08 +0100 > From: Stephan Beal > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] More timeline changes > > On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Tony Papadimitriou >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 38

2017-11-24 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:19 PM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 19:19:27 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > To: "Fossil SCM user's discussion" > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat? > Message-ID:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-24 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:43 PM, <fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:25:37 -0700 > From: Warren Young <war...@etr-usa.com> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas > > On Nov 21, 2017, at 2:09 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-24 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 05:55:51 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat? > > On 11/24/17, Johan Kuuse wrote: > > I agree on that we would give

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 35

2017-11-24 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:17 AM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:35:55 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: [fossil-users] A-B comparison of proposed timeline changes > > Which is better? > > A:

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat?

2017-11-23 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:09 PM, wrote: > > Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 19:09:21 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat? > > On 11/22/17, Offray Vladimir Luna Cárdenas wrote: > > I'm

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-21 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 4:09 PM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 16:08:20 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > > The overhead for a small batch of commits non-zero but it is > manageable. A full clone, on the other hand, is too expensive.

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas

2017-11-21 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:33:11 -0700 > From: Warren Young > Subject: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG ideas > > There is one more thing Git really gets right compared to Fossil: > single-step

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 22

2017-11-21 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:44 PM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 17:44:49 -0700 > From: Warren Young > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil-NG Bloat? > > On Nov 20, 2017, at 4:57 PM, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote: > > > > Why add

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 118, Issue 13

2017-11-11 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 8:40 PM, wrote: > > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with > git.(fwd) > Richard said: There is no way to track file merges in Fossil. Nor is there a way to > track splits - when a

Re: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files

2017-11-11 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 10:22:15 + > From: Thomas Levine <_...@thomaslevine.com> > Subject: [fossil-users] [Nmh-workers] Merging Source Files with git. > (fwd) > > Ralph asks whether a particular

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 117, Issue 15

2017-10-19 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:30:31 -0500 > From: Andy Goth > Subject: [fossil-users] Fwd: Re: Fossil README symlink > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: "Matias Fonzo"

Re: [fossil-users] Fwd: Re: Fossil README symlink

2017-10-18 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 20:12:25 -0500 > From: Andy Goth > Subject: [fossil-users] Fwd: Re: Fossil README symlink > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: Fossil README

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 32

2017-09-28 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:57 AM, wrote: > Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 06:17:30 -0400 > From: David Mason > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Using Fossil with Apache Proxy > > I'm running fossil from within a CGI of my own... I want to do

[fossil-users] Fossil hooks and workflow

2017-09-17 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 4:36 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:36:31 +0200 > From: Johan Kuuse > > Sorry for my ignorance, but I have never heard of this tool. Do you refer > to > > https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/QA-C > > Yes. >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 116, Issue 11

2017-09-16 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 01:15:25 +0200 > From: Johan Kuuse > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Shameless self-promotion > > > >El 16 sept. 2017 0:39, "Warren Young" escribió: > >>>

Re: [fossil-users] Empty file constantly being deleted

2017-09-07 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:25 PM, wrote: > The other type of empty files (actually, just one single file) is used > for a test case to check how one part of the project gracefully handles > an empty file. So, this file is actually not created by every >

Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl

2017-08-30 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 7:05 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 22:55:56 -0500 > From: Andy Goth > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] toc.tcl > Message-ID:

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion: WIKI command EXPORT clean of tags

2017-06-29 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:57:29 +0300 > From: "Tony Papadimitriou" > Subject: [fossil-users] Suggestion: WIKI command EXPORT clean of tags > > I use Wiki a lot for keeping short notes/memos

Re: [fossil-users] Smudge and clean equivalents?

2017-06-11 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 3:48 PM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 20:02:08 +0100 > From: John Pateman > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 113,

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 113, Issue 18

2017-06-11 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 11:34:48 +0100 > From: John Pateman > Subject: [fossil-users] Smudge and clean equivalents? > > Is there any way to implement functionality equivalent to git smudge

Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to merge repository's?

2017-05-31 Thread Ron W
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 22:35:31 -0500 > From: The Tick > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Is it possible to merge repository's? > > On 5/29/2017 10:30 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: > > Thus said

Re: [fossil-users] Incomplete patch with idea for enhancement

2017-04-19 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 23:52:33 -0600 > From: Warren Young > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Incomplete patch with idea for enhancement > > The only open question in my mind is what to do on

Re: [fossil-users] "CGI" command and argc

2017-03-30 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:32 AM, wrote: > > Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:15:37 +0200 > From: Florian Balmer > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] "CGI" command and argc > > > So, I would expect both

Re: [fossil-users] "CGI" command and argc

2017-03-29 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:16:35 +0200 > From: Florian Balmer > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: [fossil-users] "CGI" command and argc > ... > To get Fossil 2.1

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 110, Issue 51

2017-03-27 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:56 PM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:50:38 +0200 > From: Jan Danielsson > To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] GitLab v. Fossil. Was: Eric Raymond >

Re: [fossil-users] Conflicting edits of ticket

2017-03-16 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 2:01 PM, wrote: > > Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:31:00 +0100 > From: Richard Bukovansky > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Conflicting edits of ticket > > Some kind of “comparer” where I would be able to

Re: [fossil-users] Progress report of Fossil 2.x

2017-03-03 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 1:33 PM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 08:29:06 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Progress report of Fossil 2.x > > (4) When new content is added by means other than a check-in >

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

2017-02-26 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:23 PM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 04:23:06 + (UTC) > From: "K. Fossil user" > To: Fossil SCM user's discussion > Subject: > 2/ semi? > > > « I

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

2017-02-26 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 7:02 PM, wrote: > > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:01:56 -0700 > From: Warren Young > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first > SHA1 collision > > The PHC scheme would allow

Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first SHA1 collision

2017-02-26 Thread Ron W
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:54 PM, wrote: > > Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 20:38:48 +0100 > From: Joerg Sonnenberger > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Google Security Blog: Announcing the first > SHA1 collision > > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 26

2017-02-19 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:21:28 +0200 > From: Shlomi Fish > Subject: [fossil-users] Two problems > > I ran into three problems while trying to package the new fossil version > for >

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 107, Issue 24

2016-12-27 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Dec 26, 2016 at 7:00 AM, <fossil-users-requ...@lists.fossil-scm.org> wrote: > > Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 18:07:18 + > From: Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] incorrect user info in export --git > > On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at

Re: [fossil-users] incorrect user info in export --git

2016-12-25 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 7:00 AM, wrote: > > Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 05:11:28 + > From: Chad Perrin > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] incorrect user info in export --git > > On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 12:47:43PM -0800, bch wrote: > > On

Re: [fossil-users] workarounds for revert issues

2016-11-16 Thread Ron W
ers] fossil-users Digest, Vol 106, Issue 17 > Message-ID: <98cbbc53-197a-456a-be0a-e461f6be3...@etr-usa.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On Nov 14, 2016, at 10:09 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Nov 12, 2

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 106, Issue 17

2016-11-14 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:25 PM, wrote: > > Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 06:49:44 -0700 > From: Warren Young > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Follow-up to reverting missing files > > On Nov 12, 2016, at 4:52 AM, arnoldemu

Re: [fossil-users] features I'd like to have in fossil

2016-10-31 Thread Ron W
At the risk of wading in to a minefield, I have some thoughts. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:14 PM, wrote: > > From: Nikita Borodikhin > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:02:33 + > > == combined log - history ananlysis == > > The most

Re: [fossil-users] OT: Why we should NEVER use inetd/xinetd

2016-10-23 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 8:32 PM, wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Nathaniel Reindl > To: "Fossil SCM user's discussion" > Cc: > Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:56:51 -0400 >

Re: [fossil-users] remote check in

2016-10-23 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > From: "K. Fossil user" > Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 00:51:40 + (UTC) > > I was wondering if it is possible to do EVERYTHING [Fossil related of > course] in a browser. > I guess

Re: [fossil-users] remote check in

2016-10-23 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:00 AM, wrote: > > From: Andy Bradford > Date: 22 Oct 2016 20:48:42 -0600 > > Thus said Scott Doctor on Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:40:33 -0700: > > > The problem I am having is how to add files, do check-ins

Re: [fossil-users] Pedagogy Think Tank or Documentation Framework RFC

2016-10-11 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 10/11/2016 03:39 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > I would call that a wiki, not only inside fossil-scm but in general. > > I am inclined to think that a wiki probably isn't sufficient for many > projects. What I am casually

Re: [fossil-users] Pedagogy Think Tank or Documentation Framework RFC

2016-10-11 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 10/11/2016 03:39 PM, jungle Boogie wrote: > > I would call that a wiki, not only inside fossil-scm but in general. > > I am inclined to think that a wiki probably isn't sufficient for many > projects. What I am casually

Re: [fossil-users] How to make post-commit hook?

2016-10-11 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > > as Commit Script I have this: > tclInvoke catch {exec /home/juef/bin/f2g test} > > but it looks like a commit script is executed before commit: > /home/juef/fossil/test: date >> z && f ci -m f1 >

Re: [fossil-users] How to make post-commit hook?

2016-10-11 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Svyatoslav Mishyn wrote: > > in git repo I have this: > /home/juef/git/mirrors/fossil/test: cat .git/hooks/post-commit > #!/bin/sh > > fossil_dir=/home/juef/fossil > repo=test > > /home/juef/bin/g2f "$repo" > cd "${fossil_dir}/${repo}" &&

Re: [fossil-users] Files named "AUX" on Windows

2016-10-04 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Scott Robison wrote: > > We could modify the Windows code to use the \\.\ prefix trick and then > fossil could create / delete the files. If we did that, how much pain would > it cause to other tools and processes on the Windows system? > >

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-09-12 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > > The phrase "ephemeral content" is a bit disconcerting. It suggests > values and attitudes towards this data which will probably be reflected > in the requirements, specification, and implementation of the software. > > In

Re: [fossil-users] Unversioned files.

2016-08-30 Thread Ron W
Why only "sync -u" ? On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > A new feature of Fossil (currently unreleased and only available to > people who are willing to recompile the code on trunk) is "unversioned > files". > >

Re: [fossil-users] How to import a few commits from a git mirror?

2016-08-29 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Natacha Porté wrote: > Hello, > > Short version: I have a git repository built a mirror of a main > repository, a few changes happened to the git repository, and I would > like to find a way to bring these changes back to the fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Fix for stash-next pointer (fix for the fix)

2016-08-19 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > I don’t argue for this to make git users happy, but instead to make Fossil > more like Subversion, where there is no additional step required check out > a new repository. > Technically, Fossil checkouts do work (almost)

Re: [fossil-users] How to host fossil repositories on web server that supports only FastCGI interface?

2016-08-03 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:08 AM, John Found wrote: > > Well, I was actually wrong. fcgiwrap actually *can* wrap bash cgi scripts > (and also, perl, etc.) > So, the problem is solved and I can recommend using fcgiwrap tool for > hosting fossil repositories > on high

Re: [fossil-users] Compiler warnings

2016-08-02 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > As i rememeber it, sqlite3 won't compile with strict C89 mode because of > its use of (long long), which is C99 (but is apparently implemented in all > C compilers when not running in strict C89 mode). > This makes me

Re: [fossil-users] basic usage question - empty directories

2016-08-02 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Adam Jensen wrote: > > Subversion has "Repository Hooks" (a program triggered by some > repository event); Fossil might have had a similar capability ... > worth asking. With all the right things enabled during build, Fossil can run TH1/TCL

Re: [fossil-users] basic usage question - empty directories

2016-08-01 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > On 08/01/2016 07:40 PM, bch wrote: > > > in a controlling file. Something like a purpose-built makefile or > > script that handles this layout, so that -it- can be versioned in > > fossil; fossil wasn't/isn't currently

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-scm as an SQLite db with schema/data revision control

2016-07-27 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Adam Jensen wrote: > > [The Session Extension](http://www.sqlite.org/sessionintro.html) pointed > out by Eduardo seems to have a lot of potential. > > "The session extension provides a mechanism for recording changes to > some or all of the

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-scm as an SQLite db with schema/data revision control

2016-07-23 Thread Ron W
Hello, What you are thinking is not impossible. You do need to be aware that Fossil only uses SQLite as an index engine. Fossil does not synchronize the actual databases, only the "artifacts" (stored as "blobs" in the database). Aside from the blob table, the tables in the database are derived

Re: [fossil-users] Constructing Base URI With TH1 Variables

2016-07-17 Thread Ron W
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 2:08 AM, John L. Poole wrote: > On your suggestion, I inserted code on the setup_header page to this: > > if {[hascap r]} { > html "\n" > } > > > > And that worked: the baseURI variable in DOM was set to >

Re: [fossil-users] Constructing Base URI With TH1 Variables

2016-07-16 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 1:49 PM, John L. Poole wrote: > The Edit Page Header allows one to define an HTML page element's > child > using TH1 variables: > > > [...] > But the Base URI as defined by the above concatenation is really: > >http://themis:8080/tktview > >

Re: [fossil-users] Further mailing list configuration changes.

2016-06-30 Thread Ron W
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 11:38 AM, K. Fossil user < ticketpersonnal-fos...@yahoo.fr> wrote: > > As I said, the correct behavior should be : "reply-to" the Fossil SCM > list... > Looking at the email headers, I see "Reply-to: Fossil SCM user's discussion ", so

Re: [fossil-users] A scheme to insert the Fossil checkin ID into a built executable

2016-06-28 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Warren Young wrote: > > 5. My scheme modifies one of the input source files — as opposed to > modifying the built executable, as in Ron W’s scheme — which means you > could have an executable that claims to be built against the prior checkin >

Re: [fossil-users] Is there such an scm with GUI?

2016-06-28 Thread Ron W
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 2:39 PM, followait wrote: > In such an scm with GUI, one can: > 1. diff / merge / rebase by draging one commit to another > 2. more generally, everything can be done in the GUI, it can be intuitive > enough, so that no doc is needed > 3. by the easy

Re: [fossil-users] Merge tracking tests in a blog entry, some questions

2016-06-19 Thread Ron W
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Paul Hammant wrote: > Curiosities: > >- Having a database name rather than just a .git or .svn folder >convention >- The 'open' step. > > Fossil and SVN are more similar than you seem to think. Fossil's "open" command is much like

Re: [fossil-users] Preferred way of dealing with upstream projects maintained in different VCSes?

2016-06-16 Thread Ron W
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02 PM, lvh <_...@lvh.io> wrote: > > These are important to the software we’re building, so they ought to live > in VCS, or at least a reference to them should. How do you manage this? > Just put the .git dir in version control? Bare checkout? Something that > references

Re: [fossil-users] multiple open leaf on closed branches?

2016-06-07 Thread Ron W
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Luca Ferrari wrote: > > In the meantime I've tried the desperate trick: > > % fossil merge --integrate --force aa9521ccd9 > > but the leaf is still listed on the open ones. > As Richard said, it's not a real problem. I would suggest you

Re: [fossil-users] Weird cross-contamination between two fossil repositories (and not even talking to server!)

2016-05-31 Thread Ron W
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:39 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > In message <38334f96-17cf-e32a-e758-2d15ce5fd...@cheshireeng.com>, > Ross Berteig writes: > >One of the hooks is "command_hook" which is invoked for every > >fossil command. That name can raise an error (or

Re: [fossil-users] Weird cross-contamination between two fossil repositories (and not even talking to server!)

2016-05-27 Thread Ron W
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:58 PM, John P. Rouillard wrote: > > On that note, does anybody have code for tcl hooks that can be used to > reject artifacts that have text that matches a particular pattern. The closest Fossil has to this is the "commit permission", which

Re: [fossil-users] web-UI's timeline should use non-proportional font for commit hashes

2016-05-25 Thread Ron W
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > > --- > a.timelineHistLink { > font-family: courier; > } > --- > > Fossil has the capability for user defined "skins". Never used it myself, but I have seen some nice custom skins for Fossil. BTW, I assume CSS

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-24 Thread Ron W
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:11 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 07:06:18AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: > > On May 22, 2016, at 2:49 PM, Andy Goth wrote: > > I wouldn’t mind seeing all but “extras” go away. You should be able > > to run

Re: [fossil-users] keep-glob

2016-05-23 Thread Ron W
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 3:55 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2016-05-23 2:46 GMT+02:00 Andy Goth: > > What is the difference between keep-glob and ignore-glob? As far as I > > know, stuff in keep-glob shows up in extras and addremove, whereas it > > would be excluded if in

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-23 Thread Ron W
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > Is it fair to say, tickets, wikis and checkins are stored in artifacts…. > while pretty much all configuration stuff including TH1 code, SQL, UI > enhancements, etc are probably not artifacted? > I don't know if they are

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-23 Thread Ron W
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Steve Schow <st...@bstage.com> wrote: > > with regards to this statement… > > On May 22, 2016, at 1:40 PM, Ron W <ronw.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. > > Are ticket reports stored as

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/21/2016 9:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Andy Goth wrote: > >> The clean command has gotten very complicated, > > > > Unfortunately, most of the complexity is necessary and removing or > > changing the semantics

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil 2.0: rethinking extras, addremove, and clean

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Andy Goth wrote: > On 5/21/2016 9:03 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > > Andy Goth wrote: > >> The clean command has gotten very complicated, so I further advocate > >> removing the -emptydirs and -dotfiles options and making them always > >>

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-22 Thread Ron W
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Steve Schow wrote: > Thanks for that information. I was not aware that ticket changes involved > artifacts also. > Everything in Fossil is stored in artifacts. The DB serves as artifact storage, indexing of artifacts and a convenient cache of

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-21 Thread Ron W
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > I think perhaps you meant “commit” comment below? Its the commit comment > that needs to be tweaked, in theory, by the TH1…not the ticket itself. So > are you saying that modifying a commit comment requires that an

Re: [fossil-users] Automatic Ticket-commit tagging

2016-05-20 Thread Ron W
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Steve Schow wrote: > Hmm, very interesting idea about using the EDITOR feature to run a > pre-script…i will have to ponder that…possibly an alternative to using an > actual wrapper script…. > > Sounds like server side TH1 probably won’t do it. >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >