On 6/5/2014 1:20 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, B Harderbrad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
Here's
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
bookmarks that are very similar to git branches. Since a bookmark
is just a
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
f merge bk:trunk
typo, but you get the idea.
--
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of
those who insist
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
-bch
On 6/4/14, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
Here's something that you get for free with Fossil's model that
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
i envision them as being lightweight, i.e. local, non-versioned.
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:53 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax
Because the internet can be a poor medium to express emotional intent,
let me preface this with: Stephan, you know I have the utmost respect
for your coding chops, and we _mostly_ fall in line wrt design
philosophy. That said:
I'm shaking my head, wondering why? My current mental image is:
sb fossil bk add xp experimental:2011-06-04
I can imagine this being useful at least occasionally. I'm still
loathe to include it in core fossil, but it'd be a great task for a
little tool.
-bch
On 6/4/14, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Because the internet can be a poor medium to
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:21 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
sb fossil bk add xp experimental:2011-06-04
I can imagine this being useful at least occasionally. I'm still
loathe to include it in core fossil, but it'd be a great task for a
little tool.
In the core, basically the
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Bookmarks. That's a nice idea, actually. Added to my TODO list.
i
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively] push/pull
bookmarks.
If that's the case then they really provide no benefits over propagating
tags (which are versioned), but note that Fossil cannot
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 11:53 AM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, non-propagating tags are also checkout-able items.
What am I missing about bookmarks that we can't already enjoy w/ tags,
outside of new syntax ?
In git, tags and branches are both very light-weight bookmark-like
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the core, basically the only addition would be adding another block to
symbolic_name_to_rid(), which simply expands the ... part from bk:...
from the bookmark list, then runs that result through through
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively] push/pull
bookmarks.
If that's the case then they really provide no benefits over
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
- when you checkout a tag and then commit something, the tag doesn't
move with the HEAD of your workspace -- you're in detached HEAD mode
when you checkout a tag
- when you checkout a branch and you commit
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
To be truly useful it has to be possible to [selectively]
Nico Williams wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Stephan Bealsgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Nico Williamsn...@cryptonector.com
wrote:
Mercurial too had heavy-duty branches only, then they added
bookmarks that are very similar to git branches. Since a
Scott Robison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com
mailto:j...@joelface.com wrote:
I think Git is a great, powerful, and flexible tool that actually
has a much simpler design than it initially appears. But to get to
a place where you actually
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com wrote:
Consider it yours.
Thanks. Final form:
OH: To understand Git's design takes 99x more effort than 99% of software.
Once you get to that point it's wonderful! // Too true!
Curse the 140 character limit! :)
--
Scott Robison
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison sc...@casaderobison.com
wrote:
I really want to steal this in tweet form:
To get to a place where you understand Git's design takes 99x more
effort than 99% of software. Once
Scott Robison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
mailto:d...@sqlite.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Scott Robison
sc...@casaderobison.com mailto:sc...@casaderobison.com wrote:
I really want to steal this in tweet form:
To
24 matches
Mail list logo
